| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Supplement Store | Forums | Main Site | News Blog | Photos | eBooks |
|
|||||||
| Photo Gallery | Register | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Anabolic Zone Discussion of anabolic steroids; brands, cycles, what works, etc. Sponsored by: CEM Products |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On lake erie
Posts: 31
|
pros and cons with EQ
I am currently taking 600mg test, and 400mg of deca a week.... Now my work out partner wants me to switch to EQ instead of the Deca....
What one is better, and the pros and cons between the two. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 470
|
Switching now would be silly. Deca takes the longest to start working, and EQ is not that far off as well. Deca is in your system longer. You have a better chance of finding human grade/pharm grade deca than you do EQ, since none of it was ever made for humans. EQ is notorious for giving you a big appetite and hunger pains. I believe deca holds a little more water, so you will look a little more bloated than EQ. One is not better than the other, IMHO. They both work well...they just have to be used for long periods of time.
/V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On lake erie
Posts: 31
|
thank you for the reply....everything i found on it says that it is about the same stuff..... well thank you for the info
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 470
|
No problem buddy, best of luck!
/V |
|
|
|