Cemproducts.com


Compare eq to primo

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 38
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    In your bedroom hittin your girl doggy style
    Posts
    251
    Rep Points
    4771903

    Compare eq to primo

    I 've done some research on both from what I read they do just about the same for the body. My questiion is would EQ be a cheaper and safe alternative to the MORE EXPENSIVE PRIMO ? What I want to achive is a lean mass stack.

    test cyp
    anavar
    primo or eq

  2. #2
    Registered User

    stronger4ever's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    853
    Rep Points
    55260954


    I would go for EQ. Even if Primo is superior Im sure you get more for your bucks from EQ

  3. #3
    Registered User

    pdog781's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    19
    Rep Points
    1107763

    I am going to try primo on my next cycle...I hate Eq and would never touch that sh.. again!

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    81
    Rep Points
    5236553

    Quote Originally Posted by pdog781 View Post
    I am going to try primo on my next cycle...I hate Eq and would never touch that sh.. again!
    Just curious, did you have any bad sides, etc?

  5. #5
    HI-Tech Redneck

    klc9100's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A-Town, bitches. . .
    Posts
    1,654
    Rep Points
    201211766


    Quote Originally Posted by pdog781 View Post
    I am going to try primo on my next cycle...I hate Eq and would never touch that sh.. again!
    wow, really? i've never heard anyone say they hated EQ. what's up?
    Cutting Hurts, But I Want To Be Hard ! ! !

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Roughneck_91's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Compton, CA
    Posts
    213
    Rep Points
    34722428


    Quote Originally Posted by klc9100 View Post
    wow, really? i've never heard anyone say they hated EQ. what's up?
    That's what I'm wondering. EQ is the shit!
    These statements have been made in the spirit of philosophical discussion. The user at this IP in no way condones violation of local laws of the reader's country or region.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    the diamond
    Posts
    158
    Rep Points
    13636431

    if you got the cheese, go with the primo

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    205
    Rep Points
    5705116

    Quote Originally Posted by pdog781 View Post
    I am going to try primo on my next cycle...I hate Eq and would never touch that sh.. again!
    Damn, never heard that either, and I'm considering eq in my next cycle. Wonder what the problem was

  9. #9
    Registered User

    pdog781's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    19
    Rep Points
    1107763

    I did 400 mg a week of euro chem boldeject 200. Gave me crazy anxiety. Had to pull off the freeway several times on my way to work in the morning. Just drove me bonkers. I reduced my dose a bit and the panic attacks went away. Id say if you have ever experienced any kind of anxiety EQ might exaggerate it. Vascularity was unbelievable though. Thats why I am considering trying primo....same results with less stress on the GB receptors. Ill leave the Eq for the horses!

  10. #10
    Get outta my yard
    ELITE MEMBER

    Glycomann's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    in between
    Posts
    1,321
    Rep Points
    211581768


    Seems like nobody's used it but everybody is planning to use it. Primobolan is a very clean drug compared to equipoise. You just don't get much at all as far as side effects with Primo. It's Primo for a reason. Thing is almost all of it is fake and it's still over ten bucks for 100 mg.

  11. #11
    GMO
    GMO is offline
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP

    GMO's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    3,606
    Rep Points
    310442164


    Quote Originally Posted by Glycomann View Post
    Seems like nobody's used it but everybody is planning to use it. Primobolan is a very clean drug compared to equipoise. You just don't get much at all as far as side effects with Primo. It's Primo for a reason. Thing is almost all of it is fake and it's still over ten bucks for 100 mg.

    x2

    I would choose Primo over EQ any day. I know it is more expensive than EQ, but IMO you should run EQ for 16 weeks + for best results. Primo can be run for as little as 8-10 weeks to see good results. Also, if you run it with test, you can get away with only 400mg/wk. I haven't done the calculation for you, but 8-10 weeks of primo is probably less $$$ than 16 weeks of EQ. It is an absolute MUST that you buy this from a reputable source b/c as glycomann said, it is commonly faked and underdosed.
    Last edited by GMO; 02-10-2011 at 07:15 AM.

  12. #12
    HI-Tech Redneck

    klc9100's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A-Town, bitches. . .
    Posts
    1,654
    Rep Points
    201211766


    i'm starting a cycle with EQ on 03/01. it's GP from naps, so i assume it's real. we'll see. i will be running it @ 400/week along with GP test e @ 500/week and GP proviron @ 25/day. i'm running the test and proviron for 16 weeks and the eq for 15.

    i've never ran eq before, but did tons of reading/research and this is the ONLY negative feedback i've seen about it. that's why i decided to try it. the anxiety sounds like what alot of people said about tren. i never saw that about eq.
    Cutting Hurts, But I Want To Be Hard ! ! !

  13. #13
    Registered User

    Phetamine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    473
    Rep Points
    88784299


    Quote Originally Posted by klc9100 View Post
    i'm starting a cycle with EQ on 03/01. it's GP from naps, so i assume it's real. we'll see. i will be running it @ 400/week along with GP test e @ 500/week and GP proviron @ 25/day. i'm running the test and proviron for 16 weeks and the eq for 15.

    i've never ran eq before, but did tons of reading/research and this is the ONLY negative feedback i've seen about it. that's why i decided to try it. the anxiety sounds like what alot of people said about tren. i never saw that about eq.

    Running that low a dose won't do much you need to double it, and your length is off.

    Eq. 800 mg/ week for 16 weeks minimum recommend 20 weeks. If you don't have enough to run it that long and at that dosage hold off til you can otherwise you will just be wasting it IMO.

  14. #14
    HI-Tech Redneck

    klc9100's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A-Town, bitches. . .
    Posts
    1,654
    Rep Points
    201211766


    Quote Originally Posted by Phetamine View Post
    Running that low a dose won't do much you need to double it, and your length is off.

    Eq. 800 mg/ week for 16 weeks minimum recommend 20 weeks. If you don't have enough to run it that long and at that dosage hold off til you can otherwise you will just be wasting it IMO.
    i would never run something i've NEVER used before at that high a dosage. the manufacturer says to run it @ 300 - 800 per week. i figured 400 would be a good place to start. the manufacturer also says to run it for 8 to 20 weeks. i'm on the high side of that, so again, i think that's a good place to start.

    i appreciate your input, but like i said, i've never used it before so i'm not gonna start at the max dosage and run the max cycle with it right out the gate.

    http://www.napsgear.net/injectable-s...-equipoise-p76
    Last edited by klc9100; 02-10-2011 at 07:53 AM.
    Cutting Hurts, But I Want To Be Hard ! ! !

  15. #15
    Registered User

    stylus187's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    502
    Rep Points
    67089952


    [QUOTE=Roughneck_91;2180086]That's what I'm wondering. EQ is the shit![/ its one of the safest.. I like me some EQ!!!

  16. #16
    HI-Tech Redneck

    klc9100's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A-Town, bitches. . .
    Posts
    1,654
    Rep Points
    201211766


    Quote Originally Posted by stylus187 View Post
    My favorite, besides t-bol, its one of the safest.. I like me some EQ!!!
    how do you dose it and for how long?
    Cutting Hurts, But I Want To Be Hard ! ! !

  17. #17
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    52
    Rep Points
    5795

    why is everyone into these mega doses? if i ran 800 mgs of anything id blow up like a freaking baloon.

    Everyone is different and everyone has a comfort level.

  18. #18
    XYZ
    XYZ is offline
    THE WAR PIG
    MODERATOR

    XYZ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,754
    Rep Points
    947306619


    Quote Originally Posted by purplerain View Post
    I 've done some research on both from what I read they do just about the same for the body. My questiion is would EQ be a cheaper and safe alternative to the MORE EXPENSIVE PRIMO ? What I want to achive is a lean mass stack.

    test cyp
    anavar
    primo or eq

    You're trying to compare apples to oranges, they're not the same and they don't do the same things. 99% of primo is faked or underdosed.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    BigBird's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    107597344


    Quote Originally Posted by Phetamine View Post
    Running that low a dose won't do much you need to double it, and your length is off.

    Eq. 800 mg/ week for 16 weeks minimum recommend 20 weeks. If you don't have enough to run it that long and at that dosage hold off til you can otherwise you will just be wasting it IMO.
    I've been running EQ and haven't had any anxiety issues. But I can tell you it's the real deal. I love it. Been running at 600mg EW and there'd be absolutely no reason to up it to 800mg. I know people who enjoy its effects at 400mg EW. I agree with you about the length of EQ cycle @ 16-20 weeks but it shouldn't be necessary to run good quality EQ at 800mg EW. IMO of course.

  20. #20
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,685
    Rep Points
    406759271


    I plan on running EQ at 600 for 14+ weeks in the spring/summer.

    The only thing I've heard is that some people were disapointed with the results. I guess I'll have to try it for myself.

  21. #21
    HI-Tech Redneck

    klc9100's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A-Town, bitches. . .
    Posts
    1,654
    Rep Points
    201211766


    Quote Originally Posted by SloppyJ View Post
    I plan on running EQ at 600 for 14+ weeks in the spring/summer.

    The only thing I've heard is that some people were disapointed with the results. I guess I'll have to try it for myself.
    the people i've heard of that were disappointed with results were ones that ran eq only cycles. from what i understand it's a great compliment to other compounds though.
    Cutting Hurts, But I Want To Be Hard ! ! !

  22. #22
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,685
    Rep Points
    406759271


    Quote Originally Posted by klc9100 View Post
    the people i've heard of that were disappointed with results were ones that ran eq only cycles. from what i understand it's a great compliment to other compounds though.

    Yeah so many people love it I decided to try it so I could see for myself. I plan to use it just like you said, to compliment other compounds.

  23. #23
    Get outta my yard
    ELITE MEMBER

    Glycomann's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    in between
    Posts
    1,321
    Rep Points
    211581768


    Quote Originally Posted by Phetamine View Post
    Running that low a dose won't do much you need to double it, and your length is off.

    Eq. 800 mg/ week for 16 weeks minimum recommend 20 weeks. If you don't have enough to run it that long and at that dosage hold off til you can otherwise you will just be wasting it IMO.
    If I ran equipopise at 800 mg/w for 16 weeks my blood would turn into mud. Eq really raises RBC levels, probably more than any other AAS. Plus the anxiety at a gram a week made me a mad man. I know a lot of guys that tried front loading or high dose Eq and had problems.

  24. #24
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    In your bedroom hittin your girl doggy style
    Posts
    251
    Rep Points
    4771903

    Quote Originally Posted by pdog781 View Post
    I am going to try primo on my next cycle...I hate Eq and would never touch that sh.. again!
    ELABORATE please.

  25. #25
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    In your bedroom hittin your girl doggy style
    Posts
    251
    Rep Points
    4771903

    Quote Originally Posted by gmo View Post
    x2

    i would choose primo over eq any day. I know it is more expensive than eq, but imo you should run eq for 16 weeks + for best results. Primo can be run for as little as 8-10 weeks to see good results. Also, if you run it with test, you can get away with only 400mg/wk. I haven't done the calculation for you, but 8-10 weeks of primo is probably less $$$ than 16 weeks of eq. It is an absolute must that you buy this from a reputable source b/c as glycomann said, it is commonly faked and underdosed.
    naps

  26. #26
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    In your bedroom hittin your girl doggy style
    Posts
    251
    Rep Points
    4771903

    Quote Originally Posted by CT View Post
    You're trying to compare apples to oranges, they're not the same and they don't do the same things. 99% of primo is faked or underdosed.
    So nobody trust NAPS ?

  27. #27
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    by the beach
    Posts
    577
    Rep Points
    12230922

    I've read positive reviews on Naps here... and about their primo on several other sites. If you want to wait a few months I'll let you know ;-)

  28. #28
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,685
    Rep Points
    406759271


    They are G2G bro.

    Not sure about their primo but I haven't heard many bad things about GP products in general. I think you'll be just fine.

  29. #29
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    In your bedroom hittin your girl doggy style
    Posts
    251
    Rep Points
    4771903

    Quote Originally Posted by SloppyJ View Post
    They are G2G bro.

    Not sure about their primo but I haven't heard many bad things about GP products in general. I think you'll be just fine.
    I plan on getting NAPS' PRIMO/ANAVAR PACKAGE FOR
    Last edited by XYZ; 02-11-2011 at 11:32 AM. Reason: DO NOT POST PRICES

  30. #30
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,685
    Rep Points
    406759271


    Quote Originally Posted by purplerain View Post
    I plan on getting NAPS' PRIMO/ANAVAR PACKAGE FOR
    I wouldn't buy any of those packages. Well I haven't priced them but I would make your own cycle and do it that way. Then you have choices.
    Last edited by XYZ; 02-11-2011 at 11:33 AM. Reason: DO NOT POST PRICES

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-17-2011, 07:39 AM
  2. Please stop to compare gmp-who and fda meds with ugl and home made!
    By World-Pharma.org in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 04:24 PM
  3. Compare and contrast...
    By Curt James in forum Bodybuilding Gossip
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-07-2010, 01:48 PM
  4. compare Dextrose in creatines
    By Brolly in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-21-2005, 10:02 AM
  5. Lets compare junk mail...
    By Shae in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-11-2005, 08:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.