Thread: Methandrostenolone vs. Methandandione

Originally Posted by Runner22

Both are listed as being dbol, but what's the difference? The former was my first cycle 20 years ago and I don't recall all the water retention and the overall sides affects as with my last cycle of methandienone. In fact, the methandrostanlone was one of the best single product cycles i have have ever done - for size, strength and lean mass.

Sorry for the typo in the subject - I meant Methandienone

Thoughts and or Ideas?

Methandienone is just another name for Methandrostenolone.

They are both 17beta-Hydroxy-17alpha-methylandrosta-1,4-dien-3-one...aka Dianabol.

I, too, wondered the same thing. If they are really both the same thing chemically speaking, why do you suppose these two names are used interchangeably? Just curious. I still think the Methandrostenelone from "back in the day" was stronger on a mg per mg basis. I could just be weird/strange/bizarre/odd/different and/or special but less Dbol made me HUGE 15 years ago as opposed to the aount it takes to affect me in the same way nowadays. Perhaps, it can be explained by my body being a little different now than it was then. (Sighhhhh)

Originally Posted by GMO

Methandienone is just another name for Methandrostenolone.

They are both 17beta-Hydroxy-17alpha-methylandrosta-1,4-dien-3-one...aka Dianabol.

This ^. I think it is just different countries way of saying it.

Or those are different company's names for the same product.