*bump*

I've read that IGF 1 is the "big bro" to HGH and that you usually run it 4-8 weeks, alot shorter then HGH. It doesnt seem that its too much more expensive, so why run HGH instead of IGF?

*bump*
for the length of time you run each for IGF-1 for it is much much cheaper then HGH.
the effects of each are very different though.
never used HGH due to cost, but from what i gather IGF-1 may be the cause in both administrations for muscle hyperplasia, but i may well be wrong.
It just seems thats bang for buck IGF-1 may be the better option
"That ain't big to me, when y'all 300lbs y'all big!"- Dexter Jackson
http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/on...ml#post2523637 - the new Journal
DISCLAIMER: