Single deca injection causes genetic damage in animal test
Single deca injection causes genetic damage in animal test
Since the arrival of effective anti-oestrogens like anastrazole and tamoxifen, chemical athletes have taken to using testosterone instead of nandrolone decanoate – the active ingredient in Deca-Durabolin. Testosterone is considerably safer than nandrolone, especially at higher doses, chemical athletes have noticed.
A soon-to-be-published animal study has proved them correct. According to the research, the results of which will be published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology, nandrolone damages genetic material.
Hundreds of thousands of people use nandrolone, but we still don't know an awful lot about this anabolic steroid. In the fifties and sixties, when nandrolones first appeared on the market, pharmaceutical companies didn't do as much research on the side effects of their medicines as they do now.
Brazilian researchers at the Universidade Estadual Paulista wanted to know whether nandrolone causes damage to genes. Estradiol, a steroid that bears similarities to nandrolone, does do this. So, the Brazilians' reasoned, nandrolone decanoate may do the same.
The Brazilians injected male mice once with Deca-Durabolin. The mice got 1, 2.5 or 5 mg per kg bodyweight of nandrolone decanoate. One control group was given a groundnut oil injection, another got doxorubicin, a substance that is toxic to cells and is used in chemotherapy.
The entire experiment consisted of a single injection. After that the researchers took cell samples from the mice and examined the amount of damage to the DNA.
The results of the Comet Assay are shown below. A Comet Assay is a way of 'decombining' DNA using electric fields. The easier this is, the worse DNA is damaged. The higher the score, the greater the damage.
Another test the Brazilians used was the Micronucleus Test, the results of which are shown above. The Micronucleus Test involves counting 'wrong' nuclei in cells [MNCPE]. Cells exposed to genotoxic substances sometimes make an extra nucleus when they divide. The more extra cell nuclei the researchers see, the greater the genotoxic effect of the substance.
Cells can repair genetic damage. If they don't manage to do this, cells can self-destruct or immune cells clear up the deviant cells. But sometimes, if none of these mechanisms work, a damaged cell will turn into a cancer cell. Whether this can also happen if you use nandrolone decanoate, the Brazilians don't know. 'Carcinogenic' is a couple of steps further than 'genotoxic'. With this 'caveat' in mind, the researchers advise caution.
"Since a number of different types of mutations are involved in cancer etiology or other genetic diseases, we recommend great caution in the acute or chronic administration of nandrolone", they write. "Careful consideration of the risks vs benefits needs to be carried out before it is used in the human population."
Source:
J Appl Toxicol. 2011 Jun 30. doi: 10.1002/jat.1701. [Epub ahead of print].
Wow of course I would be in the middle of a Test and Deca cycle when this comes out.
Ouch, that hurts. Lol, kidding. It doesn't necessarily mean that nandrolone acts the same way in humans as it does in mice....
http://www.labpe.com/?referrer=CNWR_2221329406037
Please use my coupon code: IMVibrant The more you use it the bigger the discount for you
Planning a peptide order? talk to me and I may be able to get you some extras
Damn...I thought I had my next cycle all figured out. I guess I'll have to go back to the drawing board and take another look at masteron, winny and EQ. Maybe I should just slam the test alone??
I wonder if all 19-nor steroids have this effect? Hopefully its just limited to deca. I dnt thnk there's been any documented cases of deca causing cancer, has there?
There was another study showing deca decreased the growth of blood vessels at a much lower dosage than test. Not sure exactly what effect that would have but I imagine interfering with your blood vessel's ability to repair themselves is not a good thing. Now it's genotoxic as well? If I didn't already have joint issues I'd probably be staying away from nandrolone...
Nandrolone is a lean mass powerhouse, and some obscure Brazilian study done on rats is not going to dissuade me in the least. Although, I will probably never use deca again, b/c the short ester NPP is much easier to recover from. But that's just me...
I am going to continue to with the Deca until it is official but I agree with GMO NPP is much easier to recover from. I started with NPP then transitioned to Deca. NPP will probably be my choice for future use as well just faster and more for your money.
lmao I agree, we all know what we're doing isn't 100% safe. I'm not really convinced this is as bad as it sounds anyway so I'll def use npp or deca again in the future.
Last edited by Digitalash; 08-21-2011 at 08:04 PM.
damn I was thinking of bumping my deca from 200mg to 400mg. i think i'll just keep it low at 200mg. i hate reading this kinda shit now that i'm just starting to notice the deca with my joint issues. __________sigh
I never find the time to find another place,
I'm a bad motherfucker who lives it every day.
You never look at me now, you never look me in the face.
I'm a timebomb yeah
Eh, it's just one study. Still a good choice for mass building IMO. There's risk with everything.
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.