Cemproducts.com


Frontloading EQ..???

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    bama
    Posts
    178
    Rep Points
    4775774

    Frontloading EQ..???

    is this worth it? starting a test e/EQ/d-bol kicker later this fall. never front-loaded before and i didnt know if EQ was worth frontloading. thanks for the help guys

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    SUPER MODERATOR

    VictorZ06's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,048
    Rep Points
    230912757


    Nah, EQ takes too long to kick in. Won't help you front. You could use a short ester EQ to front...but I wouldn't bother, and it's tough to come by. Dbol will work just fine....or you could replace it with test prop until the test e starts to work. Be sure to run the EQ for at least 14 weeks, IMHO. EQ cycles have to be run for long periods of time. Good luck.



    /V
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

    RIP Mikhail Caldwell - AKA "supermansdaddy"

  3. #3
    Registered User

    stiphy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    102
    Rep Points
    6963404

    EQ does take longer to kick in you may wish to increase amount on first few injections to get eq level where you would like it. Here is a link that explains how long it takes for compounds to build and why you may wish to frontload some.

    Proper Dosing and Frontloading using Half life Principles

  4. #4
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,688
    Rep Points
    406759271


    I agree with Vic. Except i'd run it a minimum of 16 weeks. I'm on week 16 right now and it's pretty nice. Don't expect anything crazy from it. I plan to push it out to 18-19 weeks.

  5. #5
    Sancho

    Big Pimpin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Departing to the south climbing to 7000'
    Posts
    3,715
    Rep Points
    480495574


    I agree with the above statements. I just finished 14 weeks of EQ and realistically could have went another 4 or 6 weeks. It does take awhile to kick in.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP

    Digitalash's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    3,405
    Rep Points
    62919557


    I don't get the science behind this, the time people refer to a steroid "kicking in" generally just means the time it takes to reach it's maximum level and stabilize. Looking at the half life chart you can do that much sooner by frontloading.
    http://www.purchasepeptides.com/idev...ate.php?id=112
    ^^^AI's/SERMS/Peptides, Research use ONLY! ^


    Board Rep @ steroidmass.
    Please visit www.GRanabolic.com

  7. #7
    GMO
    GMO is offline
    Senior Member
    BOARD REP

    GMO's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    3,606
    Rep Points
    310442164


    Quote Originally Posted by Digitalash View Post
    I don't get the science behind this, the time people refer to a steroid "kicking in" generally just means the time it takes to reach it's maximum level and stabilize. Looking at the half life chart you can do that much sooner by frontloading.
    It isn't so much how fast you get to a certain level, but how long it takes for the compound to affect changes within your body. EQ takes awhile to do this regardless of how much you inject up front. Even the shorter esters of EQ take longer to affect change than its other anabolic counterparts (ie. test, nandrolone, masteron, etc).

    I can tell you this: I have front loaded with test E and noticed no significant difference than when I didn't front load. Front loading IMO is a waste of gear...

  8. #8
    Super Moderator
    SUPER MODERATOR

    VictorZ06's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,048
    Rep Points
    230912757


    Quote Originally Posted by SloppyJ View Post
    I agree with Vic. Except i'd run it a minimum of 16 weeks.

    Right on, I agree with you...I said minimum of 14 weeks because you will get some solid gains at that point, but my cycles with EQ always push from 18-20 weeks. Those extra few weeks make one hell of a difference. At least in my case it does.



    /V
    Last edited by VictorZ06; 09-27-2011 at 03:17 PM.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

    RIP Mikhail Caldwell - AKA "supermansdaddy"

  9. #9
    Swollen Member
    BOARD REP

    SloppyJ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,688
    Rep Points
    406759271


    Quote Originally Posted by VictorZ06 View Post
    Right on, I agree with you...I said minimum of 14 weeks because you will get some solid gains at that point, but my cycles with EQ always push from 18-20 weeks. Those extra few weeks make one hell of a difference. At least in my case it does.



    /V

    Add some tren ace on top of it around week 12 and hold on to your ass!
    Please be aware of the laws or your country regarding aas


    Like people about as much as they like me. Never found a way to say fuck you politely.

  10. #10
    Twisted CraZy
    MODERATOR

    TwisT's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Somewhere Warm
    Posts
    2,149
    Rep Points
    310082296


    Quote Originally Posted by VictorZ06 View Post
    Nah, EQ takes too long to kick in. Won't help you front. You could use a short ester EQ to front...but I wouldn't bother, and it's tough to come by. Dbol will work just fine....or you could replace it with test prop until the test e starts to work. Be sure to run the EQ for at least 14 weeks, IMHO. EQ cycles have to be run for long periods of time. Good luck.



    /V
    Good advice.

    Short ester EQ is known to be one of the most painful injections out there....fuuuuuck that

    -T

    PurchasePeptides.Com
    Approved source for IGF-1, Melanotan-ll, GHRP, Clenbuterol, and much more
    FOLLOW US for huge deals, discounts, and GIVEAWAYS




  11. #11
    Super Moderator
    SUPER MODERATOR

    VictorZ06's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,048
    Rep Points
    230912757


    Quote Originally Posted by SloppyJ View Post
    Add some tren ace on top of it around week 12 and hold on to your ass!
    That's what I usually do...I'll start with NPP until around week 10, wait a week, and switch over to tren ace until I finish out. No bloat or retention of any kind. Also, running two 19nors in the same cycle without the nasty sides one could get.

    And Twist is right, fast acting EQ kicks like a fuckn horse. Not worth it...sit back and wait for it to slowly creep up on ya.



    /V
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

    RIP Mikhail Caldwell - AKA "supermansdaddy"

Similar Threads

  1. Frontloading and why it's done
    By VictorZ06 in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-18-2011, 05:50 PM
  2. PH frontloading
    By jbt0214 in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 01:14 AM
  3. How do you feel about frontloading?
    By underscore in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 07:30 PM
  4. what is yall take on frontloading?
    By BIGBEN2011 in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 05:51 PM
  5. opinions on frontloading?
    By Tha Don in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.