Methadrol Extreme v Super DMZ 2.0
It's been months - possibly even a year or more - since I last posted on here, so apologies if I look like some newbie who's just jumped in at the deep end.
I've had a quick search through the forum and elsewhere online for information on both the prohormones/prosteroids mentioned above, but I don't seem to be having any joy finding anything comparing the two.
I'm clued up to an extent regarding these supplements in that I know the compounds comprising them and their effects, however, I was hoping someone could offer me insight into which of the two would be better for size.
For those who don't know my stats, I'm 30, 6', 240lbs and have been lifting for 12 years. In the last 6 years I have used M1T, H-drol, 1-Tren and Andro-RX. And at the end of August this year I completed my first AAS cycle of test and turanabol. Each anabolic outing had a PCT.
I have both Methadrol and Super-DMZ 2.0 on hand. However, I don't intend to run either of them till next year. Now I know the general consensus around here is that oral-only cycles aren't really the way forward and are ideally utilised alongside an injectable, but, as much as I enjoyed the test, I'm unsure whether to go down the route of longer cycles and pinning again.
I guess, in short, I have two questions then:
1. Which of the two supplements should I use?
2. Will either create much further growth following a 600mg/EW test cycle?