Thread: new cycle start date question

Immune to what? It is not a disease you are injecting, there is no receptor site saturation otherwise there would not be year round users.

When you feel recouperated, jump back on.

the rule i used to go by: time on= time off.

Originally posted by A.B
the rule i used to go by: time on= time off.

but i have a question...
i know for an 8wk cycle, you take 8 weeks off.

so for instance, if i finished my cycle yesterday (which i did) then wait 3 weeks to start PCT, which lasts another 3 weeks. does the PCT count as time "off"?

then when would it be ok to start up again after an 8wk cycle w/3 weeks of "waiting period" and another 3 weeks of PCT?

Originally posted by Flex
does the PCT count as time "off"?

yes it does.

it depends on the half life of the steroid when you start PCT though.

Not everyone counts it as time off, and until it begins that is counted as time on.

8 week cycle, 2 weeks cruise with no shots = 10 week cycle, this is because it takes that long for the HL of the drug to die down to even allow for PCT.

But not everyone looks at things the same, and seriously you aren't going to find people on 6-18 month cycles taking 6-18 months off.

Originally posted by Flex


does the PCT count as time "off"?

I say no. With some OTC products that people take for PH's, they act as a mild androgen. Thus there is still some suppression. I say wait till PC is over and then count.

Originally posted by Mudge
there is no receptor site saturation otherwise there would not be year round users.

When you feel recouperated, jump back on.

Interesting! I have always thought there was and have heard others say the same. I believe you can stay on cycle, but will not receive any additional benefit past a certain dosage over a period of time.

When free testosterone and estrogen levels go whack yes, and of course at some point a certain dose wont do anything for you. If receptor saturation existed, upping the dose would do nothing but give more sides, which would put us at the point where it would be impossible for the pros to get any bigger, which obviously they are.

I know of someone 5'11", and at 10% bodyfat he was 270 pounds, on 1.2 grams of EQ and test weekly. The longer someone stays on, the more the slow gains will keep coming.

According to the doctors there is no downregulation, and there is actual creation of new receptor sites.

There are many taking M 1-T now that get no additional benefit from 20 or 30mg over 10mg-just more sides. Are you saying this may be true and they just need to stay on longer to keep getting benefits?