IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Anabolic Zone
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Anabolic Zone Discussion of anabolic steroids; brands, cycles, what works, etc.

Sponsored by: CEMProducts.com


Lance Armstrong / Test question


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2005, 10:17 AM   #1
Celebrity PersonalTrainer
 
musclepump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,665
Photos: 128

Lance Armstrong / Test question

I was just thinking about this... Lance only has one nut, so his Test production is probably shot naturally, right? But he keeps winning the Tour, meaning he has to have a ton of manliness in his loins, though where does it come from--Doctor administered test? If so, how is that legal in his sport and by the IOC?

Or, since he has only one nut does he produce more estrogen and that's what gives him the endurance, as science has told us women will soon outdo men in the marathon?



Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.
musclepump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:23 AM   #2
Guardian of The Homeland
Super Moderator
 
dg806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 17,251

He's just in great shape. And this also comes after beating a bout of cancer! I think it shows just how incredible an athelete he is.



dg806 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:27 AM   #3
Training again...finally
 
thatguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 904

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclepump
I was just thinking about this... Lance only has one nut, so his Test production is probably shot naturally, right? But he keeps winning the Tour, meaning he has to have a ton of manliness in his loins, though where does it come from--Doctor administered test? If so, how is that legal in his sport and by the IOC?

Or, since he has only one nut does he produce more estrogen and that's what gives him the endurance, as science has told us women will soon outdo men in the marathon?
I've actually heard that having one nut does not lower test production very much and sometimes not at all. Your other nut just kicks it up a gear.

That could be inaccurate, but I've heard that more than once.
thatguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:33 AM   #4
Pizza the Hut
Super Moderator
 
Mudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23,027
Photos: 1

I know a guy with one nut who is my age, his natural T was about 220.

Since at least some of them cheat, I would not put it past him to do the same. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, who knows.



Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench
Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu
I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks
Mudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:34 AM   #5
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

He has also admitted to blood doping hasn't he?
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:36 AM   #6
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

My bad, he has allegedly doped in the past. Apparently in a biography some of his close friends said he has used numerous performance enhancers, like blood doping, in the past but it's not conclusive.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:39 AM   #7
Simon
 
simbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greater Ottawa Region , Canada
Posts: 986
Photos: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclepump
I was just thinking about this... Lance only has one nut, so his Test production is probably shot naturally, right? But he keeps winning the Tour, meaning he has to have a ton of manliness in his loins, though where does it come from--Doctor administered test? If so, how is that legal in his sport and by the IOC?

Or, since he has only one nut does he produce more estrogen and that's what gives him the endurance, as science has told us women will soon outdo men in the marathon?
I doubt he would be takin test as it would not any great benefit to him. What would be more accurate , would be of him taking a cardio enhancing drug . There are a multitude of drugs that help endurance as well as cardio vascular capability. But , I am sure of one thing , is that he does taking something to enhance his performances as well as most of the guys on le Tour the France . I was once in a biking club and my coach was on the moutain bike world cup when he was younger in which he did X country biking ... No need to tell you how much of a good cardio vascular shape that guy was in . Anyways , he told me one thing that I'll never forget . He said , those guys go throught out 200km (100 miles) day after day with only 1 day of rest per week , he said its pretty much impossible for a human to do that without enhancing performance drugs.

Another thing that a bit weird in my opinion is . Why the fuck would he have a doctor always with him on the tour ?



When a goal is reached comes satisfaction . You're accomplished as a person when you surpass those goals .
simbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:44 AM   #8
Pizza the Hut
Super Moderator
 
Mudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23,027
Photos: 1

Well, at the level they are pushing themselves too a doctor would probably be a good idea for those that can afford it anyway.



Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench
Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu
I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks
Mudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:44 AM   #9
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,836
Photos: 10

I believe he has been accused of using EQ.

Regardless, I bet he has an advantage only having one nut since those seats ride up between them anyway.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 10:46 AM   #10
Simon
 
simbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greater Ottawa Region , Canada
Posts: 986
Photos: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
I believe he has been accused of using EQ.

Regardless, I bet he has an advantage only having one nut since those seats ride up between them anyway.
... Well , I am sure he is doping with the results he's having ... But , his accomplishements are still great even if he dopes cuz if you asked me , the top 50 in the tour de france dopes ...



When a goal is reached comes satisfaction . You're accomplished as a person when you surpass those goals .
simbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 11:13 AM   #11
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

I would imagine blood doping would be incredibly painful and time consuming, but hey if it gives you that many Tour de France victories, its more than likely paid off.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 11:23 AM   #12
Celebrity PersonalTrainer
 
musclepump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,665
Photos: 128

Don't they have accurate enough tests to catch blood doping now? And they have doctors on the Tour because they all get IV's at the end of each stage to replace their vitamins/minerals. Lance almost always has a doping agent next to him when they do this because they want so badly to catch him doing something wrong.



Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.
musclepump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 11:28 AM   #13
on a constant bulk
Elite Member
 
westb51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: coming for that #1 spot
Posts: 384
Photos: 4

epo



this is now, i can't change tommrrow
if i can't change today
westb51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 11:37 AM   #14
HOOAH!!!
 
MTN WARRIOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOOAHVILLE
Posts: 604

Quote:
Originally Posted by simbh
... Well , I am sure he is doping with the results he's having ... But , his accomplishements are still great even if he dopes cuz if you asked me , the top 50 in the tour de france dopes ...
He is tested more than any athlete on the face of the earth. He has never even given a false positive. He has only been accused because he is so good. He was even accused by th fucking french of going through cancer so he could get the drugs to enhance his performance. I wish someone would bomb that country. I personally don't believe he juices of any sort. He enjoys pain, enjoys the mind numbing-ness of extreme endurance and has always eaten up competition. I am a big fan and until someone proves he is juicing, they need to STFU.



THAT WHICH DOES NOT KILL ME, CERTAINLY MUST MAKE ME STRONGER
MTN WARRIOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 11:47 AM   #15
Simon
 
simbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greater Ottawa Region , Canada
Posts: 986
Photos: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTN WARRIOR
He is tested more than any athlete on the face of the earth. He has never even given a false positive. He has only been accused because he is so good. He was even accused by th fucking french of going through cancer so he could get the drugs to enhance his performance. I wish someone would bomb that country. I personally don't believe he juices of any sort. He enjoys pain, enjoys the mind numbing-ness of extreme endurance and has always eaten up competition. I am a big fan and until someone proves he is juicing, they need to STFU.
Sorry dude , but how naive you can be is a bit disapointing ... Just this week , a new anabolic steroid was discovered that couldn't been found in any drug testing ... I don't need to be cocky or anything , but drug testing is usually far behind . I.E. Balco labs ... You just need the state of the art drug that isn't yet discovered in drug testing and youre fine.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/front_page/4226893.stm

This is another example ... Testes aren't up to date compared to the new comming drugs .



When a goal is reached comes satisfaction . You're accomplished as a person when you surpass those goals .
simbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:07 PM   #16
Celebrity PersonalTrainer
 
musclepump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,665
Photos: 128

I feel bad for the guys willing to use the new drugs that can't be detected; probably much more dangerous, no data backing it up...



Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.
musclepump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:23 PM   #17
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTN WARRIOR
He is tested more than any athlete on the face of the earth. He has never even given a false positive. He has only been accused because he is so good. He was even accused by th fucking french of going through cancer so he could get the drugs to enhance his performance. I wish someone would bomb that country. I personally don't believe he juices of any sort. He enjoys pain, enjoys the mind numbing-ness of extreme endurance and has always eaten up competition. I am a big fan and until someone proves he is juicing, they need to STFU.
He may have never failed an anabolic steroid test, but Lance Armstrong does not use performance enhancing drugs to increase muscle mass. His main concern is the ability of his red-blood cells to carry as much oxygen as possible, which means greater endurance. This is what blood-doping is. They remove your actual blood, centrifuge it, store it, then re-administer it into your body before performance, but it isn't permanent which is why it's such a hassle. Another type of doping is a synthetic hormone called EPO that stimulates the production of red-blood cells, resulting in increased capacity to deliver more oxygen throughout your body. These can increase performance anywhere from 5-20%. The IOC has never put much stock in developing means to test for doping, and in 1999 they actually stopped funding the research of EPO detection. The most surprising thing about doping is that the WADA(world anti-doping agency) claimed in 2000 that they finally had a conclusive test for blood doping, but in 2001 the AIC was ordered to stop and discontinue all further blood doping research due to the fact that the results of the tests "were almost always inconclusive". Just because the man has past every AAS drug test and has never admitted to blood-doping does not mean he "loves pain" and is just that good. He may be, but obviously it is quite easy to get away with blood-doping.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:23 PM   #18
Gatekepper
Moderator
 
Pirate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,725

He was in the news a few months ago because a test came back with suspicious results. I haven't heard anything about it since, but my understanding is that HRT for his condition would disqualify him from competition.



Quote:
When you sacrifice liberty for security, you lose both.
Ron Paul
Pirate! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:33 PM   #19
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclepump
I feel bad for the guys willing to use the new drugs that can't be detected; probably much more dangerous, no data backing it up...
How does the ability to detect a substance in your body make it more dangerous? There are very few, unbiased, correctly performed scientific experiments on AAS and their effects and basically no long term studies, and until society loses the "steroids kill everyone like the bubonic plague" attitude, there will never be any which is very sad, because these drugs are incredible, but guys like us on this board, who believe in educating others in the safe, responsible and proper use of anabolics, are seen as felons.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:38 PM   #20
Celebrity PersonalTrainer
 
musclepump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,665
Photos: 128

Quote:
Originally Posted by gococksDJS
How does the ability to detect a substance in your body make it more dangerous? There are very few, unbiased, correctly performed scientific experiments on AAS and their effects and basically no long term studies, and until society loses the "steroids kill everyone like the bubonic plague" attitude, there will never be any which is very sad, because these drugs are incredible, but guys like us on this board, who believe in educating others in the safe, responsible and proper use of anabolics, are seen as felons.
I'm not saying they are dangerous, but they very well could be more dangerous than other substances. They try and put other things, maybe things aren't tested for or tested at all, in their bodies and use them to get an edge. Eventually it could be the equivalent of swallowing bleach. We just never know for sure.



Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.
musclepump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:52 PM   #21
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclepump
I'm not saying they are dangerous, but they very well could be more dangerous than other substances. They try and put other things, maybe things aren't tested for or tested at all, in their bodies and use them to get an edge. Eventually it could be the equivalent of swallowing bleach. We just never know for sure.
yeah i see what your saying, but many of these guys have top notch chemists making new "designer steroids" that has an unknown molecular structure, so it's usually a far cry from bleach. Im close to finishing my undergraduate studies with a degree in chemistry, and already know a good deal about molecular structure, bond strength, and polarity etc etc. so I can't imagine what these chemists who are making the drugs can do.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 01:35 PM   #22
Registered User
 
bio-chem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,201
Photos: 14

Lance Armstrong is the most tested blood of any guys on the earth as far as sports related. they are always trying to find something in his blood. never have. they test at the end of each stage, and they test randomly over the year. they even hold his blood for years after the competition so when new tests do come out they can test it again. the doctor they bring along is a team doctor, the whole race these guys are totally getting beat up physically they totally need that guy. and his natural test levels are way down from before the cancer, he has lost 15-20 lbs of muscle mass because of it which he feels has actually helped his ability to climb mountains. less mass to haul up. i think they put a synthetic nut in the sack to balance the aesthetics dont they?
bio-chem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 01:46 PM   #23
HOOAH!!!
 
MTN WARRIOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOOAHVILLE
Posts: 604

Quote:
Originally Posted by simbh
Sorry dude , but how naive you can be is a bit disapointing ... Just this week , a new anabolic steroid was discovered that couldn't been found in any drug testing ... I don't need to be cocky or anything , but drug testing is usually far behind . I.E. Balco labs ... You just need the state of the art drug that isn't yet discovered in drug testing and youre fine.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/front_page/4226893.stm

This is another example ... Testes aren't up to date compared to the new comming drugs .
Sorry dude, how paranoid, negative and doubting of others can you be. I dont claim that you are juicing because you do well. When you are on top, you are naturally a target. You dont know me, so don't assume I am naive, little boy, based on one statement. Just because someone does well, doesnt make them a juicer.



THAT WHICH DOES NOT KILL ME, CERTAINLY MUST MAKE ME STRONGER
MTN WARRIOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 01:46 PM   #24
RIP Foreman
 
gococksDJS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,002

Quote:
Originally Posted by bio-chem
Lance Armstrong is the most tested blood of any guys on the earth as far as sports related. they are always trying to find something in his blood. never have. they test at the end of each stage, and they test randomly over the year. they even hold his blood for years after the competition so when new tests do come out they can test it again.
Blood doping tests are extremely controvercial and in many cases can easily be proven inconclusive. The most common form of doping these days is an injectible called EPO, and it's levels in the blood stream can not be measured directly by any current tests, so they measure for red blood-cell density and an increase in density could possibly mean doping, but one thing that gets many athletes off the hook when they are accused of EPO doping is training altitude. If you train at high altitude, your red-blood cell density increases, so just because all the riders use one doctor does not clear him from doping. If he trains at a high elevation before a race, he has a scientifically proven reason as to why his red-blood cell density is higher.
gococksDJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 01:48 PM   #25
HOOAH!!!
 
MTN WARRIOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOOAHVILLE
Posts: 604

Quote:
Originally Posted by PirateFromHell
He was in the news a few months ago because a test came back with suspicious results. I haven't heard anything about it since, but my understanding is that HRT for his condition would disqualify him from competition.
Wrong, he was in the news because a disgruntled friend "saw a needle in his garbage."



THAT WHICH DOES NOT KILL ME, CERTAINLY MUST MAKE ME STRONGER
MTN WARRIOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 01:55 PM   #26
Registered User
 
bio-chem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,201
Photos: 14

he is not allowed hormonal replacement therapy because of compettitions. gococks whats your point? do you say he is doping? ive read up on epo so i know what your saying, but it does seem like your trying to bring the guy down. c'mon he has stomped the french on their home court 6 strait times, he is an animal give some credit until he is proven positive for something. it seems like your assuming guilt here. correct me if im wrong, it wont bother me.
bio-chem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 02:15 PM   #27
RIP Foreman