Pirate!

by Anthony Roberts
Author of Anabolic Steroids - The Ultimate Research Guide, Vol. 1


Aromasin (Exemestane) is one of those weird compounds that nobody really knows what to do with. What we generally hear about it makes it very uninteresting…It’s a third generation Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) just like Arimidex (Anastrozole) and Femera (Letrozole). Both of those two drugs are very efficient at stopping the conversion of androgens into estrogen, and since we have them, why bother with Aromasin? It’s a little harder to get than the other two commonly used aromatase inhibitors, because it’s not in high demand, and there’s never been a readily apparent advantage to using it. And I mean…lets face it: It’s awkward-sounding. Aromasin doesn’t have much of a ring to it, and exemestane is even worse. Arimidex has a bunch of cool abbreviations ("A-dex" or just ‘dex) and even Letrozole is just "Letro" to most people. Where’s the cool nickname for


Liquid Aromasin-exemestane

Exemestane is an irreversible, steroidal aromatase inactivator. Exemestane is chemically described as 6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3, 17-dione. Its molecular formula is C20H24O2. The active ingredient is a white to slightly yellow crystalline powder with a molecular weight of 296.41.

Aromasin/exemestane? A-Sin? E-Stane? It just doesn’t work. It’s the black sheep of AIs. And why do we even need it when we have Letrozole, which is by far the most efficient AI for stopping aromatization (the process by which your body converts testosterone into estrogen)? Letro can reduce estrogen levels by 98% or greater; clinically a dose as low as 100mcgs has been shown to provide maximum aromatase inhibition (2)!

So why would we need any other AIs? Well, first of all, estrogen is necessary for healthy joints (3) as well as a healthy immune system (4). So getting rid of 98% of the estrogen in your body for an extended period of time may not be the best of ideas. This may be useful on an extreme cutting cycle, leading up to a bodybuilding contest, or if you are particularly prone to gyno, but certainly can’t be used safely for extended periods of time without compromising your joints and immune system.

That leaves us with Arimidex, which isn’t as potent as Letrozole, but at .5mgs/day will still get rid of around half (50%) of the estrogen in your body. Problem solved, right? Use Arimidex on your typical cycles, and if you are very prone to gyno or are getting ready for a contest, use Letro.

But what about Post Cycle Therapy (PCT)?

I think at this point most people are sold on the use of Nolvadex (Tamoxifen Citrate) instead of Clomid for PCT, since both compete estrogen at the receptor site, both increase serum test levels, and both drugs may also alter blood lipid profiles favorably (6). But since 20mgs of Tamoxifen is equal to 150mgs of clomid for purposes of testosterone elevation, FSH and LH, but Tamoxifen doesn’t decrease the LH response to LHRH (6) I think most people agree to Nolvadex’s superiority for PCT.

Aromasin with Nolvadex

I’ve always been in favor of using Nolvadex during PCT, along with an AI, because reducing estrogen levels has been positively correlated with an increase in testosterone (7) so in my mind, it’s be beneficial to increase testosterone by as many mechanisms as possible while trying to recover your endogenous testosterone levels after a cycle. SO which AI do we use? Letro or A-dex? Well, why don’t we just keep using whichever one we used during the cycle, and add in some Nolvadex? Unfortunately, Nolvadex will significantly reduce the blood plasma levels of both Letrozole as well as Arimidex (8). So if we choose to use one of them with our Nolvadex on PCT, we’re throwing away a bit of money as the Nolvadex will be reducing their effectiveness.

This, of course, is where Aromasin comes in, at 20-25mgs/day.

Aromasin, at that dose, will raise your testosterone levels by about 60%, and also help out your free to bound testosterone ratio by lowering levels of Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), by about 20% (12)…SHBG is that nasty enzyme that binds to testosterone and renders it useless for building muscle. But what about using it along with Nolvadex for PCT?

Difference Between Type-I and Type-II Aromatase Inhibitors

To understand why Aromasin may be useful in conjunction with Nolvadex while both Letro and A-dex suffer reduced effectiveness, we’ll need to first understand the differences between a Type-I and Type-II Aromatase Inhibitor. Type I inhibitors (like Aromasin) are actually steroidal compounds, while type II inhibitors (like Letro and A-dex) are non-steroidal drugs. Hence, androgenic side effects are very possible with Type-I AIs, and they should probably be avoided by women. Of course, there are some similarities between the two types of AIs…both type I & type II AIs mimic normal substrates (essentially androgens), allowing them to compete with the substrate for access to the binding site on the aromatase enzyme. After this binding, the next step is where things differ greatly for the two different types of AI’s. In the case of a type-I AI, the noncompetitive inhibitor will bind, and the enzyme initiates a sequence of hydroxylation; this hydroxylation produces an unbreakable covalent bond between the inhibitor and the enzyme protein. Now, enzyme activity is permanently blocked; even if all unattached inhibitor is removed. Aromatase enzyme activity can only be restored by new enzyme synthesis. Now, on the other hand, competitive inhibitors, called type II AI’s, reversibly bind to the active enzyme site, and one of two things can happen: 1.) either no enzyme activity is triggered or 2.) the enzyme is somehow triggered without effect. The type II inhibitor can now actually disassociate from the binding site, eventually allowing renewed competition between the inhibitor and the substrate for binding to the site. This means that the effectiveness of competitive aromatase inhibitors depends on the relative concentrations and affinities of both the inhibitor and the substrate, while this is not so for noncompetitive inhibitors. Aromasin is a type-I inhibitor, meaning that once it has done its job, and deactivated the aromatase enzyme, we don’t need it anymore. Letrozole and Arimidex actually need to remain present to continue their effects. This is possibly why Nolvadex does not alter the pharmacokinetics of Aromasin (11).

Conclusion

Before we close the book on Aromasin, it’s worth noting that you can (and should) still use one of the non-steroidal AIs during your cycle to reduce estrogen, if necessary. When you are ready for PCT, you can then switch over to Aromasin and still experience the full effects of an AI, since there is no cross-over tolerance experienced between steroidal and non-steroidal AIs (9). Since Aromasin is about 65% efficient at suppressing estrogen (10), it’s certainly a very powerful agent, especially considering you won’t experience reduced effectiveness because of your concurrent use of Nolvadex or from any sort of tolerance developed by using other AIs on your cycle(9). There is also a decent amount of preclinical data suggesting that Aromasin has a beneficial effect on bone mineral metabolism that is not seen with non-steroidal agents, and it may also have beneficial effects on lipid metabolism that are not found in the non-steroidal Letro and A-dex (9).

Finally, as we’re going to be using Nolvadex for PCT anyway, and we ought to be using an AI with it for maximum recovery…I think Aromasin- considering it’s compatibility with Nolvadex and beneficial effects on bone mineral content and lipid profile, has finally stopped being the black sheep of AIs and found a home in our cycles.

Leave feedback and rate this article.

References:

Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15;11(8):2809-21.
2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Sep;80(9):2658-60.
[Clinical aspects of estrogen and bone metabolism] Clin Calcium. 2002 Sep;12(9):1246-51. Japanese.
Science, Vol 283, Issue 5406, 1277-1278 , 26 February 1999
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jul;85(7):2370-7, "Estrogen Suppression in Males"
Fertil Steril. 1978 Mar;29(3):320-7
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;89(3):1174-80
.J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001 Dec;79(1-5):85-91.
The Oncologist, Vol. 9, No. 2, 126–136, April 2004
Zilembo N., Noberasco C., Bajetta E., Martinetti A., Mariani L., Orefici S. Endocrinological and clinical evaluation of exemestane, a new steroidal aromatase inhibitor. Br. J. Cancer, 72: 1007-1012, 1995
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 1943-1948, March 2004
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 12 5951-5956
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

My 1-Andro RX Journal

ag-guys

great article, from www.meso-rx.com

AG
www.ag-guys.com

redman12

VERY INTERESTING
THANKS

HAVE YOU USED Aromasin YET

luke69duke69

I was getting ready to order some goodies and am looking to add it to the tail end of my next cycle. I plan on running my first cutter, a fairly mild one, not for competing or anything, just to lose some of the BF I've accumulated running back to back bulkers in the last year. Any suggestions for a first time cut?

"I may not be the best looking guy in the bar, but I'm the only one talking to you" - J King

Mudge

A lot of people think Hooker is a joke. Being an arrogant prick doesn't help in the PR department.

Black sheep of AIs? Bullshit, everyone jacks off when people talk about it.

Kinesiology Comp Bench
MaxCalc Motivation Bench form Charles Poliquin
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu

Pirate!

I haven't used it yet. I intent to start using it on my upcoming cycle and pct. I like arimidex, but when I take it with proviron, I get bad aches. Hopefully, aromasin won't do that. If so, I'll either drop the proviron or just the aromasin during pct with my tamoxifen.

dg806

Old post, but yep, makes you rethink this thread. I would like to hear some others input on this. Bill L, PA and such...............

1-Andro Rx Pro-hormone

musclepump

"Sin" is a good one

Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.

Mista

Bump

dg806

I'm actually glad you bumped this. I was looking for some feedback on aromasin vs. Fareston. Anyone got any??

1-Andro Rx Pro-hormone

BigDyl

I didn't realize aromasin was a SERM. Fareston is though...

Total ownage.

Pirate!

They can't really be compared because aromasin is a steroidal AI and toremifene is a SERM. I can say this: they are my two favorite research chems. Aromasin is great for keeping just the right amount of estrogen. It doesn't give me any of the sides (dry joints, diminished libido, estrogn rebound etc) of other AIs. Because it is a non-competitive inhibitor, it is in it's own class of AI.

Toremifene is great! Here is why: As far as recovery goes, it does everything clomid and nolva does with the only side being oily skin and acne--which you will get from clomid and nolva, anyway. It makes my balls grow more than nolva, and it had me feeling recovered in three weeks, which is good for me. Even after a pct of nolva, my balls aren't completely up to size. Toremifene had them bigger than they have been in years. And added benefit? Porn star wads.

My last pct was toremifene and aromasin with some raloxifene when the nips got pointy. I'm very happy with that combo.

I would never do a pct without toremifene again.

My 1-Andro RX Journal

dg806

I misworded my question, but that is exactly what I wanted to know. Thanks.
Also, from what I read Fareston is nowhere near as toxic as Nolva(I read in one thread that 15mg of nolva, raises liver valves as much as 50mg anadrol).
Now I would like to find out if Aromasin is as bad on lipid values as Adex is?

1-Andro Rx Pro-hormone