As Top Restaurant Industry Lobbyist, Herman Cain Partnered With Big Tobacco To Promote Indoor Smoking
By Lee Fang on Oct 12, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Herman Cain might be known best as the former CEO of Godfathers Pizza, but he served an equally substantial role as a lobbyist for the restaurant and fast food industry. As reporter Mike Elk notes at In These Times magazine, Cain, as head of the National Restaurant Association (NRA) in the ’90s, led an aggressive campaign to stop a hike in the minimum wage; and was successful in exempting servers from being included in the 1996 minimum wage law. Although Cain avoids explicitly calling attention to his role as a lobbyist on the campaign trail, he does cite his work as a restaurant association representative in fighting against President Clinton’s health reform plan as his most formative political experience.
As a lobbyist for the NRA, Cain represented a trade association for McDonalds, Burger King, and other fast food establishments. But a little known history, uncovered by ThinkProgress using the University of California, San Francisco archives, shows that Cain also lobbied on behalf of tobacco industry giants like R.J. Reynolds and Phillip Morris.
Documents reveals a long partnership between Herman Cain, then-head of the National Restaurant Association, and the tobacco industry. Above, one of the many Cain-related meeting notes from R.J. Reynolds.
Cain met frequently with representatives of R.J. Reynolds and other cigarette companies to find areas of mutual concern. In 1993, when President Clinton proposed a health care overhaul, the expansion of coverage included a cigarette tax and a requirement for many businesses to cover their employees. The tobacco industry reached out to form an alliance against the Clinton plan, and Cain obliged given the fast food industry’s opposition to the so-called “employer mandate.” A fax, sent from the tobacco industry’s public relations firm Burson-Marsteller on July 13, 1994, proposes a positive article about Cain’s “BITE BACK” campaign against health reform and smoking bans.
As Cain rose through the ranks of the National Restaurant Association to become its CEO, his bond with tobacco giants continued. In 1997, R.J. Reynolds executive David Fishel filed a memo about a meeting between Cain and tobacco lobbyists shortly after Cain became the NRA CEO. “Cain gave every indication that the NRA and RJR have the same views with regard to excessive government regulations and the importance of letting restaurateurs determine their own smoking policies,” Fishel wrote. R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco giants were at the time engaged in a massive lobbying effort to crush local, state, and federal efforts to regulate smoking in restaurants and other places of public concern.
The relationship blossomed. At one point, Cain even signed up to help out with an international pro-tobacco publicity tour.
Blurring the lines between restaurant industry caretaker and tobacco company representative, Cain accepted hefty donations from tobacco corporations. Cain worked to snuff out a Senate bill that would have reigned in smoking at restaurants and other facilities around the country. The lobbying drive, which defeated the bill in 1998, occured just after the NRA started to see money coming in from tobacco firms.
As Cain gained political connections in the lobbying world, he let some of his associates in on his dream of becoming president. “What IS a little interesting,” remarked tobacco lobbyist Rob Meyne in a January 22, 1999 e-mail to his colleagues, “is that Cain has informed key NRA leaders … that he is, in fact, going to run for President.” Meyne mused that Cain probably couldn’t win, but could make some type of impact. Cain would be a positive addition to the Republican field because he is “good on our issues,” added Meyne.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.


If you strike me down(ban me)I'll become more powerful than ever.. Don't say i don't warn you.
minimum wage increase ALWAYS translate into nothing positive
It can but only when coupled by othe reforms.
I personally am not a fan of minimum wage due to some employees not being worth that amount. Yet also feel it is a neccesary evil.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.


Back in the 90's this was a difference of a mere $2/hr on servers who made tips/commission in addition to the servers hourly wage.
Big fucking deal.![]()
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.


led an aggressive campaign to stop a hike in the minimum wage; and was successful in exempting servers from being included in the 1996 minimum wage law.![]()
As a lobbyist for the NRA, Cain represented a trade association for McDonalds, Burger King, and other fast food establishments.
Just because it states he was successful at exempting the servers, doesn't mean he was unsuccessful with other parts. Upon further research in other articles. It can be uncovered that he lobbied many times in order to change workers rights in the fast-food industry.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.
Personally I don't think a lot of employees are truly "employable".
I do however agree with LAM that the extreme measures our nations lobbyists are allowed to go to, just hinder certain things...
There are lobbyists that are anti-steroids, which are helping keep the dark cloud over their usage.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.


We are to find a way for them to be productive in society... I spent last weekend building a playground for the United Way, where a group called FIST (Former Inmates Serving Together) had also volunteered. These men from FIST were busting ass, and blowing past most of the people from United Way. These men would have great worth in the construction industry. Other people there would work for ten minutes, then stand around and look lost... These people would be good as servers in a cafeteria. I would even be willing to give those men from FIST a chance at a position in most companies if they carried over that same hard work, and remained loyal.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.


You usually only find out they are useless once they have a job. At that point you can then fire them...
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.
Union rules need to be changed and they need to be limited to collective bargaining on salary and basic benefits, unions are not all bad. Every state should be right to work and union employees should be subject to that law as well, just as any company should be allowed to vote secretly to create a union so workers are protected. As much as it pains me to say this, there is overwhelming evidence unions raise wages in the country.
And minimum wage needs to go up, that is a key way to eliminate people being on so much public aid to live. You would be surprised what $10/hr can do for someone working 40 hours a week compared to $7....
in bold^^^ exactly how my gov scott walker is doing it.....NO MINIMUM wage doesn't need to go up.....what happens then is more people will be working minimum wage then do now.....companies will pay the minimum instead of a dollar or two more to start....also it will limit a companies ability to hire more workers.......who are these people working minimum wage? i honestly don't know any......not even the younger kids in some of my classes........minumum wage increases have NEVER been positive.....
right to work laws were written with the intent to disempower the unions. Have you ever worked for a LARGE corporation? Unions are very useful to combat oppressive working conditions, and are only as corrupt as the people involved allow them to be. There is no perfect solution, but taking away workers rights in favor of corporate interests serves no working class benefit.
walk a mile in a poor man's shoes before calling him a bum.
May the plop be on you.




I lived for years with a poor as mud mom... I learned a lot, the most impressionable being how most poor people convince themselves there is now way they can get out of being poor because it is impossible. So they remain poor resenting those of success, while moping around. There are exceptions to this, like with any other rule. Yet I find that this is the general rule of thumb. If you take away workers rights, then other regulations must be put in place to ease the transition. Ex. If you add horsepower to a car, you must upgrade the brakes. Most people overlook this "chain" that needs to take place in order to achieve successful change.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.
The larger point to be had here is when we take away worker rights, we're essentially empowering corporate interest even further at our own expense. Our government already is largely owned by corporate interest, and with the loss of workers rights, we slowly lose the capacity for peoples organised control of their own government. Worker's rights help the people to combat an enemy with another enemy. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend". De regulation is to give up the peoples control of government. Regulations are essentially the voice of the people. To de-regulate is to silence the majority for the benefit of a ruling class minority.
May the plop be on you.
In the long term a lot of the regulations that are implemented are only causing issues. The demands for unreasonable retirement plans, benefits, pay, and other issues, are only driving companies into making decisions against employing people, and towards machines in some industries. Teachers in the US are shit, yet demand more pay than they are worth. Our youth are not up to the standards they should be... So I ask; If you have a man to fix your roof and pay him to do so. He takes the money, "fixes your roof" yet it still leaks... Did he truly earn your money?
I am on here for entertainment and educational purposes only.Recipe for BBing success...Diet =80%
Routine =15% Gear/AAS =5% This = Success.
That's a reasonable question, but not every instance of worker demands and rights should be dismissed as faulty workmanship and breeding ineptitude. There is a chronic class war between workers and corporate interest in all business enterprise, and to outright dismiss worker rights as being counter productive is to just shoot ourselves in the foot. A return to feudal serfdom is a very real possibility with the loss of organised labor. Not every business is upstanding or has benevolent intentions much to the chagrin of the business sector apologist. " The leaders of men paint their actions with the rosy hues of humanitarianism and noble intention". Careful plodding and slow reaction are required to dismantle a minefield.
May the plop be on you.
we need to bring back indentured servants.....
^^^^^future indentured servant^^^^
May the plop be on you.

