PDA

View Full Version : Question for the vets



Just a guy
12-19-2003, 09:15 AM
Ok say that im on 800mg's of test.... after this cycle can u go back to 800mg's test and still put on dramatic muscle? Or do u HAVE to up the dose every cycle?

Just a guy
12-19-2003, 09:32 AM
basically im saying that if i end a cycle at like 250... could i start another cycle like 8 weeks later and gain 30 lbs.... do u know what i meen?

Mudge
12-19-2003, 09:40 AM
Some people can, some can't. Dramatic, well what is dramatic exactly. As your weight and size increases, it is not terribly likely that an additional 20 pounds of muscle can be had with the same dose that your last 20 came from.

If you want to stick to moderate doses I would say running longer cycles is the way to go, 8 weeks IMO is no longer long enough. It will also be easier on your body, you have already experienced the hell it puts on you when you gain too quickly, its not good for your heart.

crackerjack414
12-19-2003, 02:02 PM
well i can still grow realy well on fairly low doseages of test but what i like to do as far as cycling goes is i will sometimes go with lower doesages of test and higher doeseages of more androgenic compounds an example would be
500mg sust
75mg ed of tren
50mg dbol

then for a more anabolic stack id go with something like
1g of sust and 600mg eq
i belive strongly by playing with these balances u can keep your body from adapting to high perment doseages

gr81
12-19-2003, 04:39 PM
yuo will never gain as much as you did your first cycle, basically that si teh rule of thumb. Alos when you run a cycle too long your receptor sites are downgraded. How ever if you are recovering proporly and getting enough time in between cycles, you shouldn't have to worry about it too much.

Mudge
12-19-2003, 05:06 PM
Receptor sites are not downregulated, that is a myth. However when you start a cycle, you have more test and free test in the body, and lower estrogen levels - than towards the end of your cycle.

BUSTINOUT
12-19-2003, 08:52 PM
I persoanlly don't believe in receptor downgrade either. If my dosages were in proportion to weight I always made pretty good solid gains. As my weight goes up, so did my dosages on the next cycle...they were always in direct proportion. Now granted, that does not mean my dosages ever go crazy, because I usually don't put on crazy amoutns of weight anyway. Dosages are never out of control. More mass=MORE receptors not less.

Mudge
12-19-2003, 08:56 PM
:yes: The old school beliefs are getting disproven pretty frequently.

gr81
12-19-2003, 11:15 PM
Originally posted by gr81
yuo will never gain as much as you did your first cycle, basically that si teh rule of thumb. Alos when you run a cycle too long your receptor sites are downgraded. How ever if you are recovering proporly and getting enough time in between cycles, you shouldn't have to worry about it too much.


Let me re-interate that statement. I was in a hurry when typing and I misworded what I was trying to say there. I didn't necessarily mean to say that his receptor sites downgrade in that sense, I was trying to say that if he is immediately going to jump into another cycle right away without proper AR & ER recovery then his LH and test levels (both free bound and unbound) are going to be extremely low, correct. That alone would cause him to not be able to see the gains he has in his prior cycle. I misworded my statement, my bad.

BUSTINOUT
12-19-2003, 11:19 PM
yes, def needs the recovery

prolangtum
12-21-2003, 11:53 AM
Phew, I thought I was going to have to go through another receptor down regulation arguement. Its almost as bad as progesterone gyno, and winstrol being a progesterone antagonist, both are myths puported on these boards, mainly through Elite.