Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Dale Mabry
While M1T and 1 test ARE different compounds, IMO their properties are too similar to warrant stacking. It would be like stacking Deca with EQ.
According to Big Cat, it is. Now I don't know if he is correct or not, but he states "methyltestosterone is to testosterone, what dianabol is to equipoise". He goes on to say dianabol works well to kick start a EQ cycle.Originally posted by Mudge
Dbol is not exactly methylated EQ, they are just very similar.
Assuming Big Cats quote is correct, then it would also be silly to kickstart an eq cycle with d-bol. I think we can all agree without a doubt M1t is more liver toxic then its unmethylated 1-test cousin. So maybe the advantage here is to kickstart with the more powerful m1t for quicker results, much the same way you kickstart a cycle with d-bol.It seems kind of ridiculous to run two of the same thing, if it truly is the same other than an ester, as far as gains being greater "duh." If I ran twice as much of anything I would probably see at least some increase in product results.
Originally posted by Dale Mabry
That is because stupidity is not uncommon, TP.
Originally posted by Twin Peak
I don't believe the difference is merely bioavailability. The compound is changed, somehow.
Originally posted by Dale Mabry
That is because stupidity is not uncommon, TP.
Yo! I am 'from' NJ, like you are 'from' Philly.Originally posted by Dale Mabry
If Jersey Devil has used it and it worked for him, I would go by his advice over mine. Although, he is from Jersey and all.
But since moving here 5 years ago, I find myself saying YO! a lot, and have developed somewhat of an attitude.Originally posted by Twin Peak
I too, have trouble listening to someone from Jersey.
Originally posted by JerseyDevil
Yo! I am 'from' NJ, like you are 'from' Philly.
But since moving here 5 years ago, I find myself saying YO! a lot, and have developed somewhat of an attitude.
Well you certainly won't go wrong listening to Mudge's advice. I have as much respect for him as anyone here, and I owe him for giving me personal advice and for listening to me ramble in PM's.Originally posted by TrojanMan60563
I still have to sway towards what Mudge is saying.
Originally posted by Twin Peak
I don't believe the difference is merely bioavailability. The compound is changed, somehow.
Think about it. People are seeing excellent results at 10-30 mg a day. Even if you are getting 100% bioavailability, that is a very, very low dose of 1-test, where people commonly use 200-600 mg orally or transdermally.
No one knows 1-test bioavailability but it has been estimated at 10-20% orally and 30-50% transdermally.