ronnie vs. arnold

dumbdumbdinkel3 · 05-01-2006, 08:16 PM

comments??

i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...

clemson357 · 05-01-2006, 08:21 PM

arnold looks better all around. The only exception may be quads, but arnold's still have much better definition.

TJ Cline · 05-01-2006, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dumbdumbdinkel3

comments??

i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...

Well that pic was when Arnold was only 225....here he is at 240 and top shape

fufu · 05-02-2006, 05:45 AM

hahahahaha I love that Ronnie picture.

Yeah Arnold wins by a long shot.

Doublebase · 05-02-2006, 06:31 AM

Ronnie's back is sick.

fufu · 05-02-2006, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doublebase

Ronnie's back is sick.

Especially when you can see his gut hanging out on either side.

Big Smoothy · 05-02-2006, 06:41 AM

Coleman's size is impressive but his.......quads and bloated gut?

How many guys have you seen that have had Arnold's size and proportions and had a waist as narrow as Arnold?

Seanp156 · 05-02-2006, 07:32 AM

Arnold has a much better shape overall x 9999999.

33ecooks · 05-02-2006, 08:50 AM

Ronnie hands down... but the shid he's on is more advanced then when Arnold was competing.

musclepump · 05-02-2006, 03:43 PM

Frank Zane.

lnvanry · 05-02-2006, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by musclepump

Frank Zane.

.

ultimo · 05-03-2006, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fufu

hahahahaha I love that Ronnie picture.

Yeah Arnold wins by a long shot.

me too !!!! think arnold was amazing in his day and still today!!!!

NeilPearson · 05-03-2006, 03:34 PM

Hulk Hogan

Detroit_4_Life · 05-03-2006, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeilPearson

Hulk Hogan

LL COOL J

fufu · 05-03-2006, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultimo

me too !!!! think arnold was amazing in his day and still today!!!!

I agree.

Action-Jackson · 05-04-2006, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

Well that pic was when Arnold was only 225....here he is at 240 and top shape

That is fucking crazy. Arnold for the win.

TJ Cline · 05-04-2006, 01:57 AM

LoadedBats · 05-04-2006, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

Thats one of the best shots of him (Arnold that is.........not pregnant coleman). It's funny how the BB's of that era used the "vacuum" pose all the time to make the waist appear smaller.........somehow it's never used anymore......and if it is....the freaks aren't doing a very good job at it.

bigjb1 · 05-04-2006, 11:56 AM

Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe.
J

ReproMan · 05-04-2006, 12:18 PM

I look at it this way. If I had to choose who I would rather look like, it's Arnold hands down. Minus the ugly mug of course.

TJ Cline · 05-04-2006, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjb1

Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe.
J

assassin · 05-13-2006, 03:51 PM

coleman is a big fat ass i hate his body even when he's in shape he has a big gut and i don't like his over all......arnold rocks

**Prince** · 05-18-2006, 06:56 PM

I don't think bodybuilders in Arnold's era were using hGH.

Double D · 05-18-2006, 07:01 PM

You really cant say one or the other is goin to win. Bodybuilding then and now are definitly 2 seperate things! Now days its as big as possible no matter what. Then it was more about symetry, and detail. Sure size was good to, but Arnold didnt have to be 300lbs. to win.

assassin · 05-18-2006, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

I don't think bodybuilders in Arnold's era were using hGH.

foreman posted old bbs photos , i liked them a lot, i think at this time there was no steroids or hormones used yet..am i right

TJ Cline · 05-18-2006, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assassin

foreman posted old bbs photos , i liked them a lot, i think at this time there was no steroids or hormones used yet..am i right

Steroids 1950-1980...1955 is when it beacme well known with athletes
GH 1981-now...not popular till late 1980's

Tom Platz IMO was the first to use it ( I wouild guess 1980 or so) and then Lee Haney when he went from 230 to 248 in less than a year ( 1983-1984)

assassin · 05-18-2006, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

Steroids 1950-1980...1955 is when it beacme well known with athletes
GH 1981-now...not popular till late 1980's

Tom Platz IMO was the first to use it ( I wouild guess 1980 or so) and then Lee Haney when he went from 230 to 248 in less than a year ( 1983-1984)

but they were not so big like the coleman generation .........what's the secret of this

TJ Cline · 05-18-2006, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assassin

but they were not so big like the coleman generation .........what's the secret of this

PLatz had legs as good or better than any pro today or ever. In 1983 or 4 when Haney started using all the new drugs it all was uncharted so it took decades to figure out how far you could take it.

assassin · 05-18-2006, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

PLatz had legs as good or better than any pro today or ever. In 1983 or 4 when Haney started using all the new drugs it all was uncharted so it took decades to figure out how far you could take it.

i hate coleman legs , in the pic u posted arnold had smaller guads but they had a much better shape and definition, when it comes to definition coleman = 0

arnold had the ideal formula.

05-01-2006, 08:16 PM	#1
dumbdumbdinkel3 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 95	ronnie vs. arnold BODYBUILDING SUPPLEMENTS High Quality Supplements For Bodybuilders and Athletes. www.ironmaglabs.com comments?? i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...

05-01-2006, 08:21 PM	#2
clemson357 __________ Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,274 Photos: 1	arnold looks better all around. The only exception may be quads, but arnold's still have much better definition.
	________________________

05-02-2006, 05:45 AM	#4
fufu fiendish thingy Elite Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 15,480 Photos: 3	hahahahaha I love that Ronnie picture. Yeah Arnold wins by a long shot.
	fufu's 1337 Journal Your diet will set you free.

05-02-2006, 07:32 AM	#8
Seanp156 Myostatin Whore Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Columbus, Ohio Posts: 6,141 Photos: 11	Arnold has a much better shape overall x 9999999.
	My Journal

05-02-2006, 03:43 PM	#10
musclepump Celebrity PersonalTrainer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,662 Photos: 128	Frank Zane.
	Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.

05-02-2006, 06:41 AM	#7
Big Smoothy Windy City Elite Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,526	Coleman's size is impressive but his.......quads and bloated gut? How many guys have you seen that have had Arnold's size and proportions and had a waist as narrow as Arnold?

05-02-2006, 08:50 AM	#9
33ecooks Sure Thing Boss Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Colorado Posts: 103 Photos: 3	Ronnie hands down... but the shid he's on is more advanced then when Arnold was competing.

05-03-2006, 03:34 PM	#13
NeilPearson Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 2,011	Hulk Hogan

05-04-2006, 01:57 AM	#17
TJ Cline Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,544
TJ Cline Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,544

05-04-2006, 11:56 AM	#19
bigjb1 Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2	Arnold vs Ronnie Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe. J
bigjb1 Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2

05-04-2006, 12:18 PM	#20
ReproMan Señor Member Elite Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Stuart, FL Posts: 6,355	I look at it this way. If I had to choose who I would rather look like, it's Arnold hands down. Minus the ugly mug of course.

05-13-2006, 03:51 PM	#22
assassin Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: egypt/cairo Posts: 2,150	coleman is a big fat ass i hate his body even when he's in shape he has a big gut and i don't like his over all......arnold rocks

05-18-2006, 06:56 PM	#23
Prince the one & only Administrator Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Colorado Posts: 32,886 Blog Entries: 24 Photos: 300	I don't think bodybuilders in Arnold's era were using hGH.
	Support the Board Sponsors: MindandMuscle.net - Where Great Minds Converge AlltheWhey.com - Bulk Protein Powders SBMuscle.com - Supplement Superstore CEM Products - Research Chemicals & Supplements AtLargeNutrition - Optimize Your Body MusclePharm - Complete Nutritional Arsenal NEWS BLOG GOT SUPPLEMENTS?

05-18-2006, 07:01 PM	#24
Double D Senior Member Elite Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,694	You really cant say one or the other is goin to win. Bodybuilding then and now are definitly 2 seperate things! Now days its as big as possible no matter what. Then it was more about symetry, and detail. Sure size was good to, but Arnold didnt have to be 300lbs. to win.