You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access.     
IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum
Supplement Store | Forums | Main Site | News Blog | Photos | eBooks

Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > BodyBuilding & Fitness Forums > Diet & Nutrition
Photo Gallery Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Diet & Nutrition All aspects of diet & nutrition. Post questions about bulking, getting lean, healthy eating, weight loss, etc.

Sponsored by: All the Whey


Question



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-30-2009, 01:14 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: las vegas
Posts: 48

Question

I'm reading Rapid Fat Loss Book and Lyle says: Surprisingly and quite contrary to
common belief, at rest skeletal muscle doesn’t burn that many calories. The idea that
adding muscle mass will turn you into a calorie burning inferno is simply incorrect.


Is that true??

Then why do 'bigger' musclier people burn more calories??

I'm confused with this statement....
est doll is offline  
Google Bookmark this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!Furl this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usDigg this Post!
Reply With Quote



Old 05-30-2009, 01:34 AM   #2
m11
www.liftstrong.com
Elite Member
 
m11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 847

I believe the idea is that even if you have a relatively large amount of muscle mass, you'll still get fat if you eat more calories than you need.
m11 is online now  
Google Bookmark this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!Furl this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usDigg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 02:31 AM   #3
Bioidentical Bodybuilder
Super Moderator
 
Built's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: .
Posts: 6,064

Bingo. You do burn MORE calories sitting around if you're more muscular, but not THAT much more.



Wondering where to start? Confused? This will get you started.

Daredevils are Shredded
Find out why...
(Now you can find out why... in Hebrew!)

UD2.Built - My UD2.0 setup.
Built is online now  
Google Bookmark this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!Furl this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usDigg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 09:54 AM   #4
Gender: MALE
Elite Member
 
danzik17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,042

Quote:
Originally Posted by est doll View Post
I'm reading Rapid Fat Loss Book and Lyle says: Surprisingly and quite contrary to
common belief, at rest skeletal muscle doesn’t burn that many calories. The idea that
adding muscle mass will turn you into a calorie burning inferno is simply incorrect.


Is that true??

Then why do 'bigger' musclier people burn more calories??

I'm confused with this statement....
They don't. Bigger more muscular people burn more calories because they bust their ass in the gym, and if they really want to be shredded they will bust their ass in the kitchen.



danzik17 is online now  
Google Bookmark this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Twit this!Furl this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usDigg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply






Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
All logos, trademarks and content on this site are property of ©2001-2009 by IronMagazine.com™ LLC All Rights Reserved

Bodybuilding Workouts  |  Bodybuilding Supplements |  Bodybuilding News |  Bodybuilding

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36