Thread: At what bodyfat % do guys usually see quad separation

Lol....

it really depends on what you mean by separation, yeah at around 12% some guys might be able to see divide between VMO and rec fem but certainly won't see any separation of the medial elements such as the gracilis and sartorius..at 9-10% i see separation between Vastus Lateralalis/rec fem/Vmo but i don't have any striations!



Anatomy at its finest!

I think below 13%

I'm seeing the VL and VM but I think it's a bit harder to get the RF to come around. Agreed?

if you spend a decent amount of time in the mirror you can learn to make each head pop In/Out as you rotate the leg

depends on your bodyweight at 240- 290 about 8- 10%bf.

Depends on where your body stores fat and how developed your quads are.

I'm about 10-11% and I have visible seperation right up to my hip flexors, yet my abs are mostly outlines -- can't see much cross-sectional. Some people will measure lower BF upper body and higher lower, and the other way too. My lower body would easily be single digits, while my torso would be higher, but my back is also signficantly leaner. It all varies.

While we all know that certain exercises and rep ranges won't "tone" muscle groups, I will admit that I started seeing significantly more seperations when I started using conventional BB split squats.

Everyone will see seperation in various muscles differently according to your genetic disposition to fat metabolism. Of course, the more developed the muscle group is the more visible it will be.

Wow. Someone who actually cares about their legs and not their f**king abs again. Reps.

Originally Posted by vortrit

Wow. Someone who actually cares about their legs and not their f**king abs again. Reps.

Not all of us are fans of Jersey Shore. LOL

My friends call me horse legs, but only because I'm the only one who actually trains legs.... stupid lazy bums....

Originally Posted by Phineas

Depends on where your body stores fat and how developed your quads are.

I'm about 10-11% and I have visible seperation right up to my hip flexors, yet my abs are mostly outlines -- can't see much cross-sectional. Some people will measure lower BF upper body and higher lower, and the other way too. My lower body would easily be single digits, while my torso would be higher, but my back is also signficantly leaner. It all varies.

While we all know that certain exercises and rep ranges won't "tone" muscle groups, I will admit that I started seeing significantly more seperations when I started using conventional BB split squats.

Everyone will see seperation in various muscles differently according to your genetic disposition to fat metabolism. Of course, the more developed the muscle group is the more visible it will be.

you dont agree PHINEAS on how much the person weighs? i agree and should of said how developed your quads are, but i do agree in the bf to bodyweight issue as i see it time and time again. if your 190 and just mildly dense or hard/ cut youll have a easier time in getting to a 6-7 %bf than if your 290 youll have well developed quads and dense/ hard/ cut and be at 9-10 % bf. so i think alot has to do with quad developement, bodyweight at which the muscles/muscle can show all 4 factors in bbing.

Originally Posted by chronicelite

Not all of us are fans of Jersey Shore. LOL

So, I'm not the only one that wants to smash "The Situation" into the ground?

Originally Posted by assassin

I think below 13%

if thats u in your avatar assassin you look ripped.