HUH????
how do you know that your midsection was the last place you added muscle? this question is kind of weird.
Since fat is lost in the last place you put it on, would it be true to say the same thing happens to muscle, that it will break down the muscle that was put on last?. Also, does exercise also determine where it will be lost, EX:, last place muscle was added was the midsection. however, with decreased calories and swimming, the 1st muscles to be broken down first would be most likely be the arm or leg muscles since i would think they would be the ones working the hardest? thanks
HUH????
how do you know that your midsection was the last place you added muscle? this question is kind of weird.
Optimum Sports Performance
"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, in the experts there are few."
-Buddha's Little Instruction Book
I agree... strange questions and umm to be quite honest, I have never heard tell of such a thing.![]()
" To dream anything you want to dream: That is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything you want to do: That is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself to test your limits: that is the courage to succeed."
i attribute all of my running to the fact that i don't have very large legs, but it also has to do with the fact that when legs day come up i don't have as much strength as i would if i wasn't running
-Sack Up-
"If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?" Pink Floyd, Another Brick in the Wall
the midsection thing was an example, all im saying is if fat is burned off in the order it was put on ( like say you last added fat in your stomach, so consequently when you try and lose weight, the fat that would burned off first would be the fat from you belly) shouldn't the same hold true for muscle, that what was last to be put on is the 1st to be broken down and used ( like saying you have gotten bigger arms after a few months, but now you decide to do lots of cardio, the 1st place the muscle would be broken down and used is in the arms, b/c it was the last place muscle was put on) OR would it determine was exercise you were doing, like in running, maybe the leg muscles would be broken down 1st b/c they are what are being used primarily.....do you understand?i hope you do. thanks
i don't think so.
"in the howling bleeding nights, the dogs plunge into the Volga and swim desperately to gain the other bank. The nights of Stalingrad are a terror for them. Animals flee this hell; the hardest stones cannot bear it for long; only men endure."
I understand what you are saying. I guess as an exaggerated example, imagine that you are trying to hammer your arms and over a couple months or whatever gain an inch or so. So you go on a cut and will obviously lose some muscle. Your question is basically will that muscle loss come from your arms.
I would say most likely NOT. I would think on a cut you would do some form of cardio such as running, which would utilize your leg muscles. I would imagine that if this were the case, your legs would be where the majority of the muscle came from since you would prolly be overtraining them and they wouldn't get a chance to "rebuild" after workouts.
Not really sure, just kinda thinking it through.
If sense were common, everyone would have it.
4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...


yeah, I agree with Dale, however I do find that excessive running seems to shrink the legs.![]()
Isn't that what he said too?Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio
![]()
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
DISCLAIMER: