IronMagLabs.com


Rolled oats beter?

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    292
    Rep Points
    10

    Rolled oats beter?

    Nutrition facts are the same on Quaker Old fashioned oatmeal....

  2. #2
    Tom_B

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    3,589
    Rep Points
    1089729

    I know, and i can't stand rolled oats they taste different to me, so I just eat the quaker stuff

  3. #3
    Moderator
    MODERATOR

    Jodi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Gender
    Female
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    22,949
    Rep Points
    148654130


    Rolled oats are better for you than instant oatmeal. Do a search and you will see all the different posts on it but the low down is that Rolled Oats are lower GI than instant oats and much more nutritious because of having more fiber.



    Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    kvyd's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Nor MI
    Posts
    1,130
    Rep Points
    152802

    I eat quaker old fashioned. I think thats what alot of people eat around here.
    Kevin


    "If you eat alot and workout hard and consistantly you will make good gains"

  5. #5
    Tom_B

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    3,589
    Rep Points
    1089729

    ya same, besides the difference between the two is like .7 grams of fiber of something I can't remember..I'm trying to cut down on my fiber I'm usually eat around 60 grams of fiber a day.

  6. #6
    Sackin' up every day

    aztecwolf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    1,267
    Rep Points
    793788

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom_B
    I know, and i can't stand rolled oats they taste different to me, so I just eat the quaker stuff
    quaker non-instant stuff are rolled oats
    -Sack Up-

    "If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?" Pink Floyd, Another Brick in the Wall

  7. #7
    Tom_B

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    3,589
    Rep Points
    1089729

    lol I know but I find such a big taste difference, I've tried to eat rolled oats, hell I prepared it 3 or 4 different ways just to make sure that there was an option for me to eat it. But no matter what I do i find it's disgusting I can only get through half the bowl before i feel like I'm gonna vomit.
    Does anyone else beside me find a taste difference?

  8. #8
    Squishy
    ELITE MEMBER

    Pylon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Bottom of the hill
    Posts
    7,274
    Rep Points
    18801376

    Yes! I thought it was just me for a while. I usually eat oatmeal for breakfast with a scoop or 2 of protien powder and a little flax oil (hides the taste.) I really like the McCann's Irish Oatmeal (gold box.) It's done in about a minute in the microwave and mixes very smooth. The Quaker never seems to mix right. I think it needs more cook time, and I'm just not patient enough.
    "The test of courage comes when we are in the minority. The test of tolerance comes when we are in the majority." - R. W. Sockman

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    36
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Pylon
    Yes! I thought it was just me for a while. I usually eat oatmeal for breakfast with a scoop or 2 of protien powder and a little flax oil (hides the taste.) I really like the McCann's Irish Oatmeal (gold box.) It's done in about a minute in the microwave and mixes very smooth. The Quaker never seems to mix right. I think it needs more cook time, and I'm just not patient enough.
    Have patience, the Quaker Old-Fashions Oats only takes about 5 or 6 minutes in the microwave.

  10. #10
    Tom_B

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    3,589
    Rep Points
    1089729

    ya but still, they tatse nasty, the oatmeal stuff is so much better, and they have the exact same nutrition information, the only diff is that rolled oats have a GI and I don't think having some oatmeal instead of rolled oats in your siet is gonna kill you, this is basically a lifestyle change, so if you like something that's generally healthy then theres no problem to eat it

  11. #11
    INK NOT MINK
    ELITE MEMBER

    sara's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Gender
    Female
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    7,277
    Rep Points
    122818795


    Today was the first time I tried the Rolled Oats instead of the quaker old fashonined (non instant) oat.. and I can taste the difference.. the rolled oats taste more natural (more oat flavor) comparing to the one I used

  12. #12
    Sackin' up every day

    aztecwolf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    1,267
    Rep Points
    793788

    old fashioned oats are rolled oats
    http://www.foodsubs.com/GrainOats.html
    -Sack Up-

    "If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?" Pink Floyd, Another Brick in the Wall

Similar Threads

  1. Is Rolled Oats Ok Before Bed ???
    By dannygeale in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 06:15 PM
  2. oats or oats/bran/barley/rye mix
    By dontsurfonmytur in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 09:54 PM
  3. rolled oats vs "old-fashioned" rolled oats
    By cpush in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 03:04 PM
  4. Quaker 1 minute oats vs. Quaker Regular Oats?
    By rjr5353 in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 08-31-2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.