IronMagLabs.com


Tuna vs. Chicken

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Food Is Good!

    sdupdike's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Alabama
    Posts
    326
    Rep Points
    10

    Tuna vs. Chicken

    Ok, if you hate Tuna, like I do, why eat it? Why not eat chicken instead? What's the real difference nutritionally?

  2. #2
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,495
    Rep Points
    348960377


    fish is a more bioavailable source of protein
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    musclepump's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    America! Fuck yeah!
    Posts
    6,672
    Rep Points
    4928776

    It's a necessary evil. Luckily, Tuna isn't your only option.
    Let's all join together and SPEAK ENGLISH IN AMERICA.


  4. #4
    Registered User

    JoeR.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    atl
    Posts
    455
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by LAM
    fish is a more bioavailable source of protein

    Are you kidding me? Can you explain further?

  5. #5
    RAWR!
    ELITE MEMBER

    derekisdman's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,294
    Rep Points
    886733

    Fish = Mercury
    Homer: Hey! I saved your life! That egg sandwich could have killed you by cholesterol.
    Lenny: Pfft, forget it, Homer. While it has been established that eggs contain cholesterol, it has not yet been proven conclusively that they actually raise the level of serum cholesterol in the human
    blood stream.


  6. #6
    Ascendo tuum

    silencer's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    659
    Rep Points
    10

    I thought Fish=Fish ?

  7. #7
    happy sumo
    ELITE MEMBER

    PreMier's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    22,833
    Rep Points
    157391219


    Quote Originally Posted by JoeR.
    Are you kidding me? Can you explain further?


    The Biological Value, or BV, of a protein is an indicator of the quality of the protein. It is a measure of a protein's ability to be used by the body (or its bioavailability). It is a percentage (though the scale is skewed resulting in some BV's of greater than 100) of the absorbed protein that your body actually uses. Biological Values are indicators of which proteins are best at aiding nitrogen retention in muscles to help them maintain or grow in mass.

    Here is a BV chart for your enjoyment

    http://www.2-fit.com/miscellaneous/proteins.html
    P-side Inc.

    "the post-workout high is more profound than any drug-induced rush imaginable." -Dante B.

  8. #8
    Stu
    Stu is offline
    cooking up a storm
    ELITE MEMBER

    Stu's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,868
    Rep Points
    353386

    Quote Originally Posted by PreMier
    The Biological Value, or BV, of a protein is an indicator of the quality of the protein. It is a measure of a protein's ability to be used by the body (or its bioavailability). It is a percentage (though the scale is skewed resulting in some BV's of greater than 100) of the absorbed protein that your body actually uses. Biological Values are indicators of which proteins are best at aiding nitrogen retention in muscles to help them maintain or grow in mass.

    Here is a BV chart for your enjoyment

    http://www.2-fit.com/miscellaneous/proteins.html
    good post

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    3,826
    Rep Points
    2547525

    didn't know rice was up at 74!

    all the rest of that chart looks pretty familiar

  10. #10
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,495
    Rep Points
    348960377


    Quote Originally Posted by derekisdman
    Fish = Mercury
    not true. it all depends on the type of fish and the source
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  11. #11
    Registered User

    maze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    373
    Rep Points
    10

    Tuna = cheap and has more protein g per weight.
    Chiken (Breast) is expensive but tastes better (BBQ!!!)

  12. #12
    Dedicated to one thing!!!

    Martinogdenbsx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,149
    Rep Points
    3011269

    Tuna contains essential fats and is cheaper

  13. #13
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    34
    Rep Points
    10

    How much is cheap tuna? Does Costco sell them already sliced and in bulk like their bag of skinless chicken breast?
    -G

  14. #14
    Registered User

    QuestionGuy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    2,804
    Rep Points
    2998315

    tuna = = =

    yeah I hate tuna also, I acctually mic tuna, cottage cheese and oat meal together in a cup and eat it, sure I get gag reflexes all the time when I try to get it down with water, but its all worth it becasue when I am done I feel really strong and healthy, plus its all worth it when I look in the mirror, plus we all know how it feels when the ladies are checking you out!! so eat tuna man its good, I also eat chiken and lean beef..

  15. #15
    Super Moderator
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Mudge's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    24,268
    Rep Points
    52981667


    Chicken is cheaper where I live, and thankfully very lean turkey is also cheap here.

    Tuna in a 5 pound can is cheap, but I personally would not want to choke down that much on a regular basis. Its really good with chopped onions, lots of black pepper, and a fat free mayo or miracle whip.
    Motivation Bench form Charles Poliquin When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu

    Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.

  16. #16
    Registered User

    ericnb_98's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    North Orange County, CA
    Posts
    81
    Rep Points
    10

    i mix it with salsa, or salsa and a little blue cheese dressing

  17. #17
    Registered User

    maze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    373
    Rep Points
    10

    I think that tuna is the cheaper source of good protein .. a 50 cent can provides 30g of protein, omega-3 fat, almost no carbs and you dont need to cook it.

    Whoever makes a tasteless tuna will be rich.

  18. #18
    C U T T I N G

    Yunier's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    378
    Rep Points
    10

    Tuna is great. Low calories, no carbs, high protein, almost no fat, no cooking, and its cheap, you can't beat that. I sometimes have between 2-4 cans daily all by itself.

  19. #19
    RAWR!
    ELITE MEMBER

    derekisdman's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,294
    Rep Points
    886733

    Quote Originally Posted by LAM
    not true. it all depends on the type of fish and the source
    Yes but the majority of fish and tuna commercially produced will have traces of mercury.
    Homer: Hey! I saved your life! That egg sandwich could have killed you by cholesterol.
    Lenny: Pfft, forget it, Homer. While it has been established that eggs contain cholesterol, it has not yet been proven conclusively that they actually raise the level of serum cholesterol in the human
    blood stream.


Similar Threads

  1. Canned Tuna....Too much tuna?
    By Back2gym in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-02-2010, 10:17 AM
  2. Canned tuna or chicken any good?? salt ?!
    By djk80 in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-04-2009, 11:36 AM
  3. Tuna or Flavored Tuna
    By Lost Grizzly in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 02:23 PM
  4. Tuna Salad vs Canned Tuna
    By Hlanderr in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 06:02 PM
  5. Chicken Noodles And Tuna!!!!
    By Lifting4life in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-27-2005, 08:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.