IronMagLabs.com


Counting cals using LBM or total bw?

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    ..is bulking up!
    ELITE MEMBER

    BulkMeUp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cana-dah
    Posts
    5,659
    Rep Points
    3462055

    Counting cals using LBM or total bw?

    My diet calc uses LBM for protein and fats as the fat dosent need to be fed (the rest are carbs). But total cals required are calc using total bw, not LBM.

    Should i calc total cals required using LBM as well or use total bw?? My guess is total bw, but would like some expert opinions
    Last edited by BulkMeUp; 04-04-2005 at 11:18 AM.

  2. #2
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,494
    Rep Points
    348960377


    I use LBM for all of my nutritional calculations. I don't see the point in feeding my fat cells anymore than I already have.
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    JoeR.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    atl
    Posts
    455
    Rep Points
    10

    Do you use the same guidlines than? 10-20 cals based on whether your cutting or bulking?

  4. #4
    Acting Normal...

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Different shades of black
    Posts
    5,554
    Rep Points
    1024185

    Don't use those crappy number x body weight formula things - they are, well, crap!!

    Get your required protein (1.2 to 1.5 x LBM) and fats (0.3 to 0.6g x LBM) and then adjust your carbs according to your goals (dieting, adding mass or maintaining) and activity levels (usually, the more active you are the more carbs you will require).

    The best way to find out how much you need is via trial and error but I usually use this to give a 'REALLY ROUGH' estimate:

    Find lean mass in kg = {total weight (pounds) x [1.0-(BF%/100)]} / 2.2

    Find approximate RMR = [21 x lean mass (kg)] + 400

    Multiply by your activity factor:
    - bed-ridden/pretty sedentary: < 1.2
    - moderate activity: 1.3 to 1.4
    - pretty active (gym 3-5 x week, active in daily life): 1.4 to 1.6
    - very active (gym >5 x a week, V.active in daily life): 1.6 to 1.8
    - heavy activity (professional sports, heavy labour): 1.8 to 2.2

    Adjust for goals:
    - aiming to loose weight: you decrease by 5 to 10% and wait for a few weeks (2 to 3) to see the effect. If there is no effect decrease again by a further 5 to 10% (based on new calorie intake) and wait for another 2 weeks. etc. Don't continue to drop too many calories - instead, increase cardio or try alternative macronutrient options or cyclic type dieting.

    - Body re-comp: keep calories at, or just slightly below, maintainence. Train consistently, eat well and monitor progress via BF%/strength/measurements.

    - gaining mass: you increase by 5 to 10% in the same fashion as above. Monitor your BF% and strength gains and adjust intake accordingly.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    JoeR.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    atl
    Posts
    455
    Rep Points
    10

    Cool, thanks.. It does come out extremely close though to the other system. Although this does take in lots more factors.

  6. #6
    ..is bulking up!
    ELITE MEMBER

    BulkMeUp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cana-dah
    Posts
    5,659
    Rep Points
    3462055

    Quote Originally Posted by LAM
    I use LBM for all of my nutritional calculations. I don't see the point in feeding my fat cells anymore than I already have.
    Thanks LAM. I'd like to starve them fat cells without the rest of me withering away.

  7. #7
    ..is bulking up!
    ELITE MEMBER

    BulkMeUp's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cana-dah
    Posts
    5,659
    Rep Points
    3462055

    Quote Originally Posted by Emma-Leigh
    Don't use those crappy number x body weight formula things - they are, well, crap!!
    Thanks for the great input, Emma. I adjusted the pro and fats as per LBM but was feeling quite hungry throughout the day even though cals were 15-16x my total bw. I was beginning to wonder if i was undereating.

    Thanks for the info. I guess i'v got some more homework to do.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    repeej's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada Eh!
    Posts
    68
    Rep Points
    10

    Thanks again for the great info Emma.

Similar Threads

  1. Total cals vs. Protein and bodyfat gains
    By Will Brink in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-06-2012, 03:13 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 10:41 AM
  3. EFA Cal Counting????
    By danchubbz in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2006, 07:01 AM
  4. counting cals
    By thajeepster in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-08-2004, 08:29 AM
  5. Total cals a day ...
    By NickB in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-02-2002, 09:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.