IronMagLabs.com


Any love for the common 'tater?

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Gordo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    O' Canada...stuck in the middle of you
    Posts
    1,084
    Rep Points
    923188

    Any love for the common 'tater?

    It seems that sweet potato seems to be more favoured than a regular spud. Is it simply due to starch content?
    I know the sweet potato is more favoured during, say a cut, but is there really any reason to avoid a regular potato on a bulk?

    Is it a matter of cals,carbs,GI, etc...? The regular potato has a good amount of vitamins and fiber provided it's not fried and eaten with it's jacket

    Actually if you look at it as simply a matter of gi/gl, Canadian new potatos (which are reallly....really....really....good) and white potatos have a pretty similar profile as sweetpotatos.

    Emma? Jodi? A little confused here on spuds.


  2. #2
    Acting Normal...

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Different shades of black
    Posts
    5,554
    Rep Points
    1024185

    Quote Originally Posted by Gordo
    It seems that sweet potato seems to be more favoured than a regular spud. Is it simply due to starch content?
    I know the sweet potato is more favoured during, say a cut, but is there really any reason to avoid a regular potato on a bulk?
    It usually comes down to their GI - Regular potato's have a very high GI (up to around 100 in some cases!) while sweet tato is a lot lower...

    But it really needs to be taking into context and in my opnion people get far too concerned about the GI of potato... Once you combine it in a meal with some fats, fibre and lean protein, the total glycaemic load and index of the meal decreases substantially... and it is not going to be such an issue..

    Also, potato has a pretty high satiety rating - which means that it will help to keep you full and this will help with cutting...

    But people think 'odd' things when... eg: many people avoid things with 'sugar' in them while cutting (eg: fruit, dairy) but sweet tato has LOTS of sugar in it and they will happily eat them.. and then the will add dextrose to the shakes too... Anyway...

    It basically comes down to being sensible and eating the correct amount of calories, protein, healthy fats and fibre and then using carbohyrates as required for your goals, genetics and training routine...

    And yes - The GI of the food should be considered - but it is certainly not the 'be all and end all' of carbs!! Things like snickers bars have low GIs while things like watermelon have really high GIs.... So does that mean you'll get cut if you don't eat watermelon and chow down on snickers?!

    Anyway - there are other things to think about with carbs - first and formost it is the level you are eating and the times at which this is occuring... then think about things like fibre content, glycaemic load, satiety rating, insulin index.... They are usually more important than the GI alone.

    Plus, if you think about it, the GI has only been around for a few years... Old-school BB used to chow down on 'real spuds' when cutting and they still got lean...


    With that said - I usually recommend sweet tato (actually I recommend yam - which is completely different)... Some people trying to lose weight (especially those with lots of abdominal fat) will usually have glucose resistance issues (or the early stages diabetes) and lower GI/GL foods become particularly relavent in their cases. Also, sweet tato has a slightly better vitamins/mineral/phyto-nutrient content (eg: higher vit A level)...

    So anyway - Eating them on a bulk is certainly ok! If you want to eat them on a cut (if you like them better than regular sweet tato) then try them - just combine them in appropriate portions with appropriate proteins, fats and fibre...
    ~


  3. #3
    Registered User

    Gordo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    O' Canada...stuck in the middle of you
    Posts
    1,084
    Rep Points
    923188

    Great info Emma

    thanks

Similar Threads

  1. Common Misconceptions
    By VonEric in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-27-2011, 07:34 PM
  2. 8 of Your Most Common Questions About Sex
    By Gena Marie in forum Sexual Health
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-09-2011, 05:49 AM
  3. Overtraining not as common as we may think?
    By GOtriSports in forum Training
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-08-2008, 06:58 AM
  4. Is it common?
    By Skyliner in forum Training
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-26-2001, 01:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.