Thread: Shrimp?

for the most part dietary cholesteral has no relation to individual cholesteral measurements.

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

for the most part dietary cholesteral has no relation to individual cholesteral measurements.

So you think it's good?

I see no problem with shrimp as a part of a diet. However everything in Moderation.

Well, the wife brought some home last night and while I was eating the shit out of them, I started wondering what they were doing to me!!

Thanks

Cute Kid in your avatar!!

This has been discussed a few times before, and they were found to be healthy.

I figured they had, I've just not seen the thread.

Thanks

Here's a thread you might want to check out.

50 to 70 shrimp cocktail??

I hate posting when I don't need to!!

Thanks again

No problemo, we all do it.

If you wanna get healthy do NOT eat any type of shellfish (crab, shrimp, lobsters, ect...). The reason that is is because they obsorb pollution in the bottom of the ocean and it stays within there shell. Think about it like this, shellfish is the food most people have allergic reactions too...

STFU. Go find some Dr. Mercola site to preach on

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

for the most part dietary cholesteral has no relation to individual cholesteral measurements.

Look at this fucking idiot trying to sound like a doctor.

Yeah you figured me out troll.

Do some research and you will come to the same conclusion.

Saturated Fats and Lack of exercise are keys to Cholesteral levels.

As well as your Genetic makeup

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

Yeah you figured me out troll.

Do some research and you will come to the same conclusion.

Saturated Fats and Lack of exercise are keys to Cholesteral levels.

As well as your Genetic makeup

Stop with your absurd theories, give me a link.

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

If you wanna get healthy do NOT eat any type of shellfish (crab, shrimp, lobsters, ect...). The reason that is is because they obsorb pollution in the bottom of the ocean and it stays within there shell. Think about it like this, shellfish is the food most people have allergic reactions too...

No, you give ME a link.

Originally Posted by FishOrCutBait

No, you give ME a link.

OWNED



http://www.pulitzer.org/year/1997/pu...ice/works/2-2/

But he’s afraid of one day getting cancer or some other disease from eating the fish that are exposed to the cocktail of toxic chemicals found in the water and sediment around Lake Charles. He’s also afraid that the problem may threaten others.
"The fish we catch in Lake Charles migrate and travel all the way from the Gulf," Ringo said. "We’ve had hot spots of pollution show up over the years all the way from Lake Charles to Hackberry. We’ve got commercial oystermen and crabbers and shrimpers all through here."

What the fuck does that prove.

Joe Blow thinks something so it must be true.

Post a proper fucking study

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

OWNED



http://www.pulitzer.org/year/1997/pu...ice/works/2-2/

But he’s afraid of one day getting cancer or some other disease from eating the fish that are exposed to the cocktail of toxic chemicals found in the water and sediment around Lake Charles. He’s also afraid that the problem may threaten others.
"The fish we catch in Lake Charles migrate and travel all the way from the Gulf," Ringo said. "We’ve had hot spots of pollution show up over the years all the way from Lake Charles to Hackberry. We’ve got commercial oystermen and crabbers and shrimpers all through here."

Okay, title of thread? "Shrimp?" quotes from your article?:

"The greatest single risk to seafood consumers, health officials say, is raw shellfish, particularly oysters, mussels and clams contaminated with bacteria and viruses from water polluted with fecal matter or, less commonly, with naturally occurring marine bacteria."

"The most common cause for closure is fecal matter washed into the oyster beds from urban areas or nearby farmland. Oysters contaminated with waste can cause cholera and other diseases."

The majority of that article focuses on fish and/or oysters. Not once did the word "shrimp" even APPEAR in that article, the closest thing we got was Shrimpers, referring to the shrimp fishermen who PASS THROUGH areas of pollution, did it even say anything about fishing for or catching shrimp there? NOPE

READ

Health concerns about oysters already have shut down many of the beds in Louisiana, and prices have been depressed by the recent scares and federal Food and Drug Administration warnings.

Scientists have shown it was the pesticide DDT in fish that almost wiped out fish-eating birds like the bald eagle and brown pelican during the 1950s and ‘60s by causing their eggshells to be too thin for chicks to survive.
DDT, along with more than 100 other chemicals, also is being blamed for a host of reproductive and hormonal problems that could threaten whole fish populations in the Gulf.

State officials say there’s not much they can do if people ignore warnings.

The danger is especially high among subsistence fishers and poor people who supplement their diets with large portions of fish taken from local waters, sometimes ignoring warning signs and advisories in their search for a cheap source of food.

In 1991, thousands of fish were killed in wetlands bordering sugar cane fields when pesticides applied in wet weather washed into bayous.

In February, officials found dangerously high levels of mercury contamination in bass from lagoons in New Orleans’ City Park

Originally Posted by FishOrCutBait

Okay, title of thread? "Shrimp?" quotes from your article?:

"The greatest single risk to seafood consumers, health officials say, is raw shellfish, particularly oysters, mussels and clams contaminated with bacteria and viruses from water polluted with fecal matter or, less commonly, with naturally occurring marine bacteria."

"The most common cause for closure is fecal matter washed into the oyster beds from urban areas or nearby farmland. Oysters contaminated with waste can cause cholera and other diseases."

The majority of that article focuses on fish and/or oysters. Not once did the word "shrimp" even APPEAR in that article, the closest thing we got was Shrimpers, referring to the shrimp fishermen who PASS THROUGH areas of pollution, did it even say anything about fishing for or catching shrimp there? NOPE

Dude, shrimp is NO DIFFERENT than any of those. They're all shellfish. Even Stallone doesnt eat shellfish anymore.

Oh no Stallone doesn't eat shellfish. Do you realize how retard you sound with these lame ass arguments.

Should we stop eating everything. Cause there is contamination everywhere.

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

READ

Well i just read them and couldn't see the word shrimp

True Story Tuna is actually bad for you because they eat plankton and plankton absorb harmful gamma rays emmited from huge ocean liners trawling the bottom of the sea bed for sea food

Originally Posted by Martinogdenbsx

Well i just read them and couldn't see the word shrimp

True Story Tuna is actually bad for you because they eat plankton and plankton absorb harmful gamma rays emmited from huge ocean liners trawling the bottom of the sea bed for sea food

I dont believe you. That's obsurd.

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

Dude, shrimp is NO DIFFERENT than any of those. They're all shellfish. Even Stallone doesnt eat shellfish anymore.

I have a special reccomendation for everybody concerned with heavy metals poisoning their bodies.

TAKE L-TAURINE.

Its one of the cheapest, and most easily manufactured amino acids on the market, its taste is relatively mild, and supplemental taurine has been shown to help with a host of health problems.

"Neuroprotection

The brain is another area where taurine is particularly important. Taurine plays an essential role in both brain development and regeneration and promotes the survival and proliferation of neurons [19]. Additionally, supplemental taurine exerts a definite pharmacological effect in the brain [20]. Taurine is a potent neuroprotectant, protecting against glutamate excitotoxicity, cerebral ischemia, oxidative stress, and the buildup of toxins (including carbon tetrachloride and ammonia) [21-25]. Among other things, this neuroprotection is due to regulation of calcium homeostasis and apoptosis, direct scavenging of toxins, and a reduction of oxidative stress [23-26]. Taurine also holds promise as an anticonvulsant and in the prevention of epilepsy [7, 27-28]."

Heavy metals & toxins

Taurine protects many of the body's organs against toxicity and oxidative stress due to various substances. Taurine neutralizes the toxin hypochlorous acid, thus protecting from DNA damage [7]. In the liver, taurine inhibits the toxic effects of high fructose feeding, alcohol, acetaminophen, and thioacetamide in rats; taurine also improves some markers in patients with hepatitis [7; 40-43]. In the kidneys, taurine protects against cisplatin toxicity and prevents renal damage from salt feeding in salt-sensitive rats [44-45]. Taurine also protects against ulcers caused by monochloramine, a toxin associated with H. pylori infection [46]. Accumulation of heavy metals can have a variety of toxic effects, and taurine reduces the damage caused by excess levels cadmium, copper, and lead in rats [47-49]. Taurine also reduces the toxic effect of oxidized fish oil in rats [50].

Dosage & toxicity

Toxicity is not a concern with taurine, as no signs of toxicity have been indicated in animal studies [58]. For general health and increased exercise performance, 1-4 g daily is commonly used (with at least 1 g prior to exercise), while most clinical trials for treatment of conditions have utilized dosages in the range of 3-6 g daily."

All quotes taken from http://www.bulknutrition.com/?articleID=47

If you're so concerned with having a healthy body, why are you depriving yourself of a diverse amino acid profile? This is one of the worst things you can do to your body, it weakens life sustaining organs, i.e. the heart, liver, kidneys and brain. These 4 organs use a variety of different aminos, and are made up of different aminos. Just one of the many reasons it is of UTMOST importance to get a diverse amino profile

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

I dont believe you. That's obsurd.

no, its absurd

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

I dont believe you. That's obsurd.

100% True Story

Originally Posted by 911=InsideJob

I dont believe you. That's obsurd.

I quote that to your user name.

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

Oh no Stallone doesn't eat shellfish. Do you realize how retard you sound with these lame ass arguments.

Should we stop eating everything. Cause there is contamination everywhere.