IronMagLabs.com


Hershey's 'mockolate' move

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Thumbs down Hershey's 'mockolate' move

    Bad move.





    <H5>By Adam Satariano

    Bloomberg News

    Would chocolate containing trans fats and sugar substitutes taste as sweet as the real thing? Hershey Co. and other candy-makers say yes.
    The Chocolate Manufacturers Association, whose members include Hershey, Nestle SA and Archer Daniels Midland Co., has a petition before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to redefine what constitutes chocolate.

    They want to make it without the required ingredients of cocoa butter and cocoa solids, using instead artificial sweeteners, milk substitutes, and vegetable fats such as hydrogenated and trans fats.
    "They are trying to pull one over on us," said Cybele May, 40, publisher of CandyBlog, on which she has encouraged more than 200 people to write the FDA to protest what she calls "mockolate." "What they are asking for is permission to confuse the consumer for what we readily accept as chocolate," she said.

    Gary Guittard, fourth-generation owner of Guittard Chocolate Co., wants to keep chocolate from the dark side, too. He has enlisted the support of high-end companies such as billionaire Warren Buffett's See's Candies to fight the big chocolate-makers.
    "The process of this thing going through, it wasn't transparent, and it needs to be brought out into the light," Guittard said from his San Francisco home.

    In a grassroots campaign, Guittard set up the Web site "Don't Mess With Our Chocolate," which includes a link allowing people to write to the regulator before the public comment period ends May 25.
    Cocoa prices in New York have surged about 28 percent in the last six months on speculation that dry weather may impair cocoa production in the Ivory Coast and Ghana, the world's largest suppliers of beans to make chocolate.

    "Cocoa butter is the most expensive ingredient there is, and so it adds up to a substantial amount of money," said Guittard, whose 139-year-old company in Burlingame, Calif., is a member of the chocolate manufacturers association.
    A pound of chocolate contains roughly 25 percent cocoa butter at a cost of $2.30, while vegetable oils are as little as 70 cents a pound, Guittard said.

    Julie Anderson, 37, of Joliet, Ill., eats chocolate at least once a day and occasionally writes up her thoughts on a blog. She said there was a distinct taste difference when other fats are used for cocoa butter.
    "Any product that doesn't have the cocoa butter doesn't taste as good and doesn't feel the same on your tongue," said Anderson, who wrote to the FDA opposing the change. "A high-quality chocolate, when you put it in your mouth, it melts and becomes very silky. With hydrogenated oils, it feels kind of waxy or greasy."

    Karalee LaRochelle, owner of Cocoa Locoa, a small, privately held chocolate company based in New York, said the change undermines the benefits of chocolate. Flavenols and antioxidants in the 2,000-year-old sweet have been reported to play a role in curbing strokes and heart failure.
    "I don't understand why we'd want to have more candy bars laden with trans fats when cocoa butter is natural and beneficial to you," LaRochelle said.

    Americans consume 3.6 billion pounds of chocolate a year, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. That's about 12 pounds per person.
    Earlier this month, Hershey increased candy prices for the first time in two years because of the rising cost of corn syrup and packaging. The company said in February that it would close more than one-third of its assembly lines and cut 1,500 jobs, and said Monday that it would shut a plant in Reading with 260 employees.

    "This is really all about the big chocolate manufacturers like Hershey and Nestle insulating themselves from an increase in the price of cocoa," said Clay Gordon, a New York publisher of chocophile.com. "It's all about how Hershey and Nestle stay competitive, and how we create Easter bunnies to sell for 39 cents."


    document.write('');
    </H5>

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    danzik17's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    3,796
    Rep Points
    61145583


    Let's take all the remaining benefits out of the shit most people eat already.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    .
    Posts
    533
    Rep Points
    10

    "Americans consume 3.6 billion pounds of chocolate a year"

    ew

  4. #4
    Amateur Gynecologist
    ELITE MEMBER

    vortrit's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Show Me State
    Posts
    11,053
    Rep Points
    866227410


    Quote Originally Posted by kcoleman View Post
    "Americans consume 3.6 billion pounds of chocolate a year"

    ew
    And I'm not one of them. Unless you count Chocolate Whey.
    DRSE Reconnaissance


  5. #5
    Voodoo Doll
    ELITE MEMBER

    Little Wing's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Gender
    Female
    Location
    Bangor, Maine
    Posts
    30,608
    Rep Points
    948199680


    it will cost them more when people avoid their mockolate and buy real chocolate from someone else.

    Don't look back ~ You're not going that way!






  6. #6
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by Little Wing View Post
    it will cost them more when people avoid their mockolate and buy real chocolate from someone else.
    Agreed, it would be a stupid move now especially when most sane people are moving away trans fat.....

  7. #7
    Registered User

    slip's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    346
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Wing View Post
    it will cost them more when people avoid their mockolate and buy real chocolate from someone else.
    Some will.

    The lower class masses however will lap it up and buy up big. They will make more money.

  8. #8
    the true playboy

    kicka19's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,889
    Rep Points
    3007242

    Quote Originally Posted by slip View Post
    Some will.

    The lower class masses however will lap it up and buy up big. They will make more money.
    lower class america discuts me on so many level, little pigs for the most part
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke8395

    But, I've been with girls that had saggy chests and boring butts and they still had no personality. Those girls are usually really bitter. I think they realize they are useless.

  9. #9
    Audios Envy
    ELITE MEMBER

    ABCs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    My Mind
    Posts
    1,151
    Rep Points
    2359286

    Quote Originally Posted by kicka19 View Post
    lower class america discuts me on so many level, little pigs for the most part
    Ignorant much?
    After almost 2 weeks... I am back and better than ever.

Similar Threads

  1. cant move up
    By paul_uk in forum Training
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-17-2007, 01:19 PM
  2. When I move to AZ...
    By Dale Mabry in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-21-2006, 01:37 PM
  3. where would you move?
    By joesmooth20 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-21-2006, 12:10 PM
  4. Should I move??
    By cappo5150 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 08-20-2004, 12:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.