IronMagLabs.com


Diet pop and sodium question

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    165
    Rep Points
    10

    Diet pop and sodium question

    Hello,

    I am wondering why diet pop is bad for a person on a calorie restricted diet in order to lose fat if there are no calories? I hear it isn't good for us. Why? Is it the sodium?

    That leads to my next question. I am wondering if too much sodium makes us retain water more, even if we drink a ton of water? It seems my whole body is jiggly and loose at times (not very firm), and I am wondering if that has something to do with drinking a lot of diet pop with sodium? Otherwise what could be the issue?

    Thank you for your help!!!!

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    206
    Rep Points
    220723

    Sugar replacers are not very healthy, I personally believe that you are better off with real sugar any day than a sugar replacer.

    I suspect that sugar replacers have a similar insulin response despite having no calories, so even if they lack calories on their own, they would still trigger food craving (this is pure speculation here, no science to back this up, I'd love to know if it's been proven or disproven though). Any time I eat a sugar replacement my stomach tells me so (it's kind of a hungry/grumbly kind of feeling, it's distinct though) so generally I avoid them, I will say xylitol doesn't seem to do that to me but as far as I know that one is only used in gum so it's not like I'd be consuming very much of it.

  3. #3
    fiendish thingy
    ELITE MEMBER

    fufu's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    18,430
    Rep Points
    60099873


    I think it is mostly the aspartame.

    Diet soda only has something like 35 mgs of sodium per can, that isn't that much.

    Compare it to a single hot dog (~350 mg) to a can of tuna (~500 mg).
    fufu's 1337 Journal

    Your diet will set you free.

    I hate exercise, I love training.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Valias's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    278
    Rep Points
    664278

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    Sugar replacers are not very healthy, I personally believe that you are better off with real sugar any day than a sugar replacer.

    I suspect that sugar replacers have a similar insulin response despite having no calories, so even if they lack calories on their own, they would still trigger food craving (this is pure speculation here, no science to back this up, I'd love to know if it's been proven or disproven though). Any time I eat a sugar replacement my stomach tells me so (it's kind of a hungry/grumbly kind of feeling, it's distinct though) so generally I avoid them, I will say xylitol doesn't seem to do that to me but as far as I know that one is only used in gum so it's not like I'd be consuming very much of it.
    Insulin without the calories? Anabolic dream.
    "I'll eat all the damned Ham, Cheese, Tomato, Onion toasted sandwhiches I want." -Val

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    206
    Rep Points
    220723

    Or dieter/diabetic nightmare, diet soda would be on the chopping block for a lot of diets that rely on low carbs if your body acted as though it was getting carbs even though the no cals... it'd be nice to know if there was a study either way.

    I thought that everyone quit using aspartame (at least in the us?) and for the most part switched to sucralose (but not in canada where as I understand it their FDA has not approved it)?

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Nigeepoo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Yateley, Hants, United Kingdom
    Posts
    280
    Rep Points
    894361

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I thought that everyone quit using aspartame (at least in the us?) and for the most part switched to sucralose (but not in canada where as I understand it their FDA has not approved it)?
    Sucralose was approved in Canada in 1991 and is now approved in more than 40 countries, including the United States, which was granted FDA approval in April 1998. It was approved in the EU around 2003. See Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences
    "You lost fat by raising calories. Because of magic and voodoo. Or leptin. One of those." McDonald L.
    Blog

Similar Threads

  1. low sodium diet and bulking... very difficult for me.
    By Zer0vette in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-13-2009, 11:06 AM
  2. very low salt/sodium diet
    By sicko in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-26-2005, 04:21 PM
  3. LAM Or Anyone Else...Sodium Question
    By Premo55 in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-15-2004, 08:07 PM
  4. Two Diet Questions: Olive Oil & Sodium
    By BlackLabelSDMF in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-30-2003, 09:59 PM
  5. sodium in diet..
    By greddy in forum Diet & Nutrition
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-26-2003, 09:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.