How many meals a day is adequate?

**Prince** · 08-25-2001, 12:59 PM

Will you reap better results if you eat 8 times per day, rather than 5 or 6 times per day?

------------------
Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

TheSupremeBeing · 08-25-2001, 02:51 PM

Meal number isn't a big deal.

Just get your calories and macro's in and you'll be fine.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

cytrix · 08-25-2001, 05:50 PM

i agree with TSB, it won't make a difference whether you eat 5 or 7 times, if the calories and nutrients remain the same. of course, 1 or 7 times would make a difference, since the body can only use so much right away. if you ate 1 huge meal per day, much of the carbs and fat will end up as bodyfat (the metabolism will slow down) and also protein would be turned to bodyfat, since only so much could be used right away, and thus wouldn't be available for muscle recovery and growth.

<FONT COLOR="#000002" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[Edited 1 time by cytrix on 08-25-2001 at 06:51 PM]</font>

**Prince** · 08-25-2001, 06:01 PM

I read an article once by Lee Labrada where he talked about how he had always eaten 5 meals per day. Then one year he decided to up it to 6 meals. He claimed that year he made a ten pound weight gain and had not changed anything else in his diet or training.
It was a credible article since Lee obviously was not one of the "heavier" drugged up bodybuilders. (IMO) I doubt if he ever even used GH.

------------------
Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

cytrix · 08-25-2001, 06:13 PM

did he eat an additional meal, meaning additional calories? or did he devide his present calories into 6 instead of the previous 5? if he added food, of course he would gain weight

TheSupremeBeing · 08-25-2001, 06:40 PM

The end result is the same...

Lee is on drugs.

Eating your calories in 6 meals VS 5 makes no difference when it's all said and done.

I've eaten 10 meals per day, and I've eaten 4....no difference.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

**Prince** · 08-25-2001, 06:59 PM

TSB, you crack me up!

I know Lee was on drugs. But you have to admit in comparison to the junkies today, Lee was almost natural!

If I remember correctly (this was a couple of years ago), he did not increase calories, just added a additional meal and spread the calories out.

------------------
Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

MesomorphFreaK · 08-25-2001, 07:54 PM

Are you talking about spreading your calories out across multiple meals, or are you adding additional calories?

------------------
Come not between the dragon and his wrath...

TheSupremeBeing · 08-25-2001, 08:13 PM

Of course Lee says that.

Lee sells MRP's.

You eating more meals = you buying more of his MRP's.

I suggest you stop getting information and recommenedations from supplements sites (I remember you doing it before, too).

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

**gopro** · 08-31-2001, 06:37 AM

Need to put in my 2 cents here.In my experience eating more frequently will give you better results in the long run.Do not go more than 3 hours without getting a "meal" in,altough I find every 2 hours works best.I personally get 8 feedings in per day.I used to do 6,but after switching to 8 I have made significant progress.The most important meals and those in which should provide the most calories from protein and carbs are meal #1 and your post workout meal.Your body is most ready to uptake nutrients at these times.The best way to find out is to try it yourself...I doubt you'll be dissapointed.

------------------
symmetry over size

Herc · 08-31-2001, 08:10 AM

I read an article in one of the health mags where they had people eat 17 times a day. They found the same thing that everyone here is agreeing on: get the Cals and Micros in as even a way a possible and you will be fine. Do what works for you and your schedule

------------------
Three people can keep a secret, so long as two of them are dead.

- Benjamin Franklin

Maki Riddington · 08-31-2001, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gopro:
Need to put in my 2 cents here.In my experience eating more frequently will give you better results in the long run.Do not go more than 3 hours without getting a "meal" in,altough I find every 2 hours works best.I personally get 8 feedings in per day.I used to do 6,but after switching to 8 I have made significant progress.The most important meals and those in which should provide the most calories from protein and carbs are meal #1 and your post workout meal.Your body is most ready to uptake nutrients at these times.The best way to find out is to try it yourself...I doubt you'll be dissapointed.

*** I actually have gone from 5 large meals to 8-9 smaller meals every 2 hours and I have found so far to be alot more effective in terms of fat loss and overall well being.

------------------
Exercise, my drug of choice

**Prince** · 08-31-2001, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Maki Riddington:

*** I actually have gone from 5 large meals to 8-9 smaller meals every 2 hours and I have found so far to be alot more effective in terms of fat loss and overall well being.

Watch yourself Maki, you're disagreeing with TheSupremeBeing!

------------------
Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

TheSupremeBeing · 08-31-2001, 04:46 PM

Yeah, how dare you.

What do you meant you "got better results in fat loss and better well being"? What were your results in terms of fat loss with less meals VS more. How do you measure "well being"? Just how you feel? Well, that would be due to a million different things, as I recall you started taking an ECA at the same time as increasing meal frequency and when I'm on ECA I feel pretty ace too.

------------------
Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

Maki Riddington · 08-31-2001, 11:15 PM

Well then I take back what I just said back.

------------------
Exercise, my drug of choice

<FONT COLOR="#000002" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[Edited 1 time by Maki Riddington on 08-31-2001 at 12:16 PM]</font>

w8lifter · 09-01-2001, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheSupremeBeing:
Yeah, how dare you.
How do you measure "well being"? Just how you feel?

You're not starving! That makes me feel pretty well

------------------
Behind every great man is his BUTT

My FitPit

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
over training?	danny81	Training	23	05-19-2007 07:40 PM
Official westside thread.	Malley	Training	74	03-21-2007 10:45 PM
CKD Diet	w8lifter	Diet & Nutrition	16	03-05-2005 03:27 PM
Figure Calorie needs-packing on muscle	dg806	Diet & Nutrition	15	11-11-2004 10:56 PM

08-25-2001, 12:59 PM	#1
Prince the one & only Administrator Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Colorado Posts: 34,174 Blog Entries: 25 Photos: 322	How many meals a day is adequate? Will you reap better results if you eat 8 times per day, rather than 5 or 6 times per day? ------------------ Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

08-25-2001, 02:51 PM	#2
TheSupremeBeing Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo. Posts: 598	Meal number isn't a big deal. Just get your calories and macro's in and you'll be fine. ------------------ Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

08-25-2001, 05:50 PM	#3
cytrix Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: chicago, il , usa Posts: 287	i agree with TSB, it won't make a difference whether you eat 5 or 7 times, if the calories and nutrients remain the same. of course, 1 or 7 times would make a difference, since the body can only use so much right away. if you ate 1 huge meal per day, much of the carbs and fat will end up as bodyfat (the metabolism will slow down) and also protein would be turned to bodyfat, since only so much could be used right away, and thus wouldn't be available for muscle recovery and growth. <FONT COLOR="#000002" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[Edited 1 time by cytrix on 08-25-2001 at 06:51 PM]</font>

08-25-2001, 06:01 PM	#4
Prince the one & only Administrator Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Colorado Posts: 34,174 Blog Entries: 25 Photos: 322	I read an article once by Lee Labrada where he talked about how he had always eaten 5 meals per day. Then one year he decided to up it to 6 meals. He claimed that year he made a ten pound weight gain and had not changed anything else in his diet or training. It was a credible article since Lee obviously was not one of the "heavier" drugged up bodybuilders. (IMO) I doubt if he ever even used GH. ------------------ Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

08-25-2001, 06:13 PM	#5
cytrix Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: chicago, il , usa Posts: 287	did he eat an additional meal, meaning additional calories? or did he devide his present calories into 6 instead of the previous 5? if he added food, of course he would gain weight

08-25-2001, 06:40 PM	#6
TheSupremeBeing Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo. Posts: 598	The end result is the same... Lee is on drugs. Eating your calories in 6 meals VS 5 makes no difference when it's all said and done. I've eaten 10 meals per day, and I've eaten 4....no difference. ------------------ Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

08-25-2001, 06:59 PM	#7
Prince the one & only Administrator Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Colorado Posts: 34,174 Blog Entries: 25 Photos: 322	TSB, you crack me up! I know Lee was on drugs. But you have to admit in comparison to the junkies today, Lee was almost natural! If I remember correctly (this was a couple of years ago), he did not increase calories, just added a additional meal and spread the calories out. ------------------ Just because the majority believes it, does not make it true!

08-25-2001, 07:54 PM	#8
MesomorphFreaK Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 5	Are you talking about spreading your calories out across multiple meals, or are you adding additional calories? ------------------ Come not between the dragon and his wrath...

08-25-2001, 08:13 PM	#9
TheSupremeBeing Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo. Posts: 598	Of course Lee says that. Lee sells MRP's. You eating more meals = you buying more of his MRP's. I suggest you stop getting information and recommenedations from supplements sites (I remember you doing it before, too). ------------------ Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

08-31-2001, 06:37 AM	#10
gopro NGA/IFPA Pro Bodybuilder Moderator Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Ft. Lauderdale Florida Posts: 10,523	Need to put in my 2 cents here.In my experience eating more frequently will give you better results in the long run.Do not go more than 3 hours without getting a "meal" in,altough I find every 2 hours works best.I personally get 8 feedings in per day.I used to do 6,but after switching to 8 I have made significant progress.The most important meals and those in which should provide the most calories from protein and carbs are meal #1 and your post workout meal.Your body is most ready to uptake nutrients at these times.The best way to find out is to try it yourself...I doubt you'll be dissapointed. ------------------ symmetry over size

08-31-2001, 08:10 AM	#11
Herc Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 38	I read an article in one of the health mags where they had people eat 17 times a day. They found the same thing that everyone here is agreeing on: get the Cals and Micros in as even a way a possible and you will be fine. Do what works for you and your schedule ------------------ Three people can keep a secret, so long as two of them are dead. - Benjamin Franklin

08-31-2001, 04:46 PM	#14
TheSupremeBeing Senior Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Chillin' in mah cribb, yo. Posts: 598	Yeah, how dare you. What do you meant you "got better results in fat loss and better well being"? What were your results in terms of fat loss with less meals VS more. How do you measure "well being"? Just how you feel? Well, that would be due to a million different things, as I recall you started taking an ECA at the same time as increasing meal frequency and when I'm on ECA I feel pretty ace too. ------------------ Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.

08-31-2001, 11:15 PM	#15
Maki Riddington Fat Bastard Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Canada Posts: 383	Well then I take back what I just said back. ------------------ Exercise, my drug of choice <FONT COLOR="#000002" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[Edited 1 time by Maki Riddington on 08-31-2001 at 12:16 PM]</font>