| --> |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak BTW, why does your sig refer to 1-Test then? |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak DG, chemically and physiologically, it HAS to be better. We have discussed this. I know you believe you see better results from 1AD. You, perhaps, are an anomoly. But chemically, they end up being the same drug in the body. And the 1AD obviously does not convert at a 100% rate. So mg for mg 1T HAS to be more effect. I know you know this, I explain for the original poster. |
|
Originally posted by dg806 This refers to 1-test gel...... |
| chemically and physiologically, it HAS to be better. |
| I know you believe you see better results from 1AD. You, perhaps, are an anomoly. But chemically, they end up being the same drug in the body. And the 1AD obviously does not convert at a 100% rate. So mg for mg 1T HAS to be more effect. I know you know this, I explain for the original poster. |
|
Originally posted by 1Fast400 1-AD is the best oral product out there period. This is a common misconception. If you stack 300mg of 1-AD vs 300mg of an oral 1-test, the 1-AD will always come out on top. The liver destroys most of the oral 1-T product. 90% of people will see better results with 1AD as opposed to any other 1-T product. You don't understand the science as to why these products work. |
|
Originally posted by 1Fast400 1-AD is the best oral product out there period. This is a common misconception. If you stack 300mg of 1-AD vs 300mg of an oral 1-test, the 1-AD will always come out on top. The liver destroys most of the oral 1-T product. 90% of people will see better results with 1AD as opposed to any other 1-T product. You don't understand the science as to why these products work. |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak I'll certainly defer to your knowledge on this Mike. But if thats true than you suck for letting my by VPX. Also I thought that oral 1 Test (I'll use this instead of 1T to prevent the confusion) converted at around 15%. I thought 1AD, 4AD, and even boldione were about the same. And at what percentage does 1AD convert to 1Test? In other words, what % of 1AD gets into the blood, and what % of that is converted to 1 Test? |
|
Originally posted by dg806 The gains you got off of VPX were outstanding! I don't think you would have seen any more with 1-ad...... And don't confuse the absorption of orals and transdermals together. |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak I'll certainly defer to your knowledge on this Mike. But if thats true than you suck for letting my by VPX.
|
|
Originally posted by dg806 You didn't believe me
|
|
Originally posted by dg806 TP, I would try a good 4/ad product while you can. The increased estrogenic activity is best for mass! |
|
Originally posted by dg806 TP, i have been looking for a thread this weekend that talks about absorption and conversion. Haven't found it yet, but i'll keep looking. It may not be 100% accuarate like Mike says, but it is as close as we will get right now. |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak 2) Mike elaborated. He added that 1AD has more bioavailability than 1Test, in oral form. He stated that 1Test is broken down by the liver more so than 1Test. |
|
Originally posted by dg806 If you look at a 10% conversion of 1-ad, 300mg taken daily would be 30mg converted in the blood. For a transdermal absorption rate of 40%, if you get 200mg 1-test daily, that would be 80mg daily. More than double. Now I have seen where Par said eventually the transdermal would go through the liver. Not sure at what point and how much breakdown. So the 80mg may be lower. |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak First, unless you have a source, those numbers are no better than mine or Big Cat's. Second, you are missing a critical step of 1AD, unless you are assuming that it passes throught the liver at 100%; but I don't think that is what you are saying. |
| No this was on BDC..................I still can't find it. |
| If you look at a 10% conversion of 1-ad |
| The numbers are what most agree on wheather right or not?? |
|
Originally posted by 1Fast400 Please don't further ignorance on the web by throwing fake numbers out. |
| Until you get real world proof, you have to have some kind of base number to go on. I never said it was concrete. |
|
Originally posted by dg806 I've never seen BC refer to any # other than in his main article. It's the other hundreds that seem to agree. Why are you so hung up on numbers? It doesn't make a crap to me one way or the other. I think all we really have to go on is real world feedback from people you can trust. And look at my post on bb.com vs. here. You can see I'm not a bb.com junkie. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.