A Good Wife's Guide [Forum Archive]

Pages: 1

A Good Wife's Guide

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: Prince

this has been posted before, but it still cracks me up!

A Good Wife's Guide

Posted by: dino

Posted by: Prince

that was a real article from 1955, don't get mad at me!

Not to sound sexist but think of how much more functional life was back then. The wife stayed home and took care of the house and the kids.
Today are kids get raised in daycares by unqualified teenagers and we struggle at nights and on the weekends to grocery shop, do laundry, clean the house, etc.

It's rediculous!

Posted by: Jodi

Can you fucking believe that! Less than 50 years ago and women were actually thought to be inferior! I don't know of too many magazines that would have to balls to publish something like that now. We would eat them alive!

Thank God we will never see days like that again.

Posted by: RCfootball87

yeah, plus, marriages stayed together. there was like a 5% divorce rate or something, because divorce was comlpetely scorned. i think everything went downhill when God was taken out of the public schools and evolution was put in, but thats jsut me. and dont even start a religion thread, cause we'll all be at each other's through. but it is true that right after God was taken out of school, teen preganancy, and crime rose drastically.

Posted by: Jodi

Actually thats total bullshit. Especially about Teen Pregnancy. Instead parents shamely took their daughters out of their public school and put them in specials schools and homes to have their babies. All this being done and never a word of it spoken to anyone. I know several people that this happened to. An now they have children older than me out there but because it was all so secret there were never any documents about the adoptions or they were destroyed and they can't even find their children that they didn't want to give up in the first place but were forced to.

Yes divorce was scowled upon but there were more cheating husbands than there are now but the wives couldn't do anything about it. They just had to suck it up. Things were just as bad then its just that it was all kept to family secrecy because people were ashamed. Now its public and people think its worse and ITS NOT! At least now women get to speak up for themselves. Thats the difference, and I'm glad its changed. An I don't think taking God out of schools had anything to do with it.

Posted by: RCfootball87

note that with my above post im not saying we're inferior or anything cause that was nuts, i just think that we should have kept some of the things in society ni the 50's, like say for example......morales. but im getting really off track so il stop rambling

Posted by: Badger

I'll have to agree with mochy in that taking God out of the schools had nothing to do with any of the teen pregnancies or the future divorce rates. All of this went on just as it does now but like it has already been said it was kept behind closed doors. There is so much going on in todays world that has never been talked about in the past. Take for instance all of the sex scandles in the church. Don't think for a second that this is something new. If God is truely the reason for our kids being all screwed up then where has He been for the past couple of centuries while the priests have been molesting little boys?

Posted by: Badger

By the way Prince, nice work on the list. It is good for a laugh lol

Posted by: w8lifter

Originally posted by mochy
Actually thats total bullshit. Especially about Teen Pregnancy. Instead parents shamely took their daughters out of their public school and put them in specials schools and homes to have their babies. All this being done and never a word of it spoken to anyone. I know several people that this happened to. An now they have children older than me out there but because it was all so secret there were never any documents about the adoptions or they were destroyed and they can't even find their children that they didn't want to give up in the first place but were forced to.

Yes divorce was scowled upon but there were more cheating husbands than there are now but the wives couldn't do anything about it. They just had to suck it up. Things were just as bad then its just that it was all kept to family secrecy because people were ashamed. Now its public and people think its worse and ITS NOT! At least now women get to speak up for themselves. Thats the difference, and I'm glad its changed. An I don't think taking God out of schools had anything to do with it.

Damn straight!

Posted by: Prince

I do not think women are inferior now or then, I just think that society and families were much more functional back then...it's all fucked up now.

Posted by: firestorm

I agree that all wives should read that and take notes. (Please don't tell my wife I just said that or I'm DEAD)!!!!

Posted by: rainbowash

i love it prince! it's hilarious! and that's why my marriage never worked! i don't follow that crap! but it's great!!! it made me laugh! i know better! gals dont be mad just dont ever marry any man who swallows that tripe lol!

Posted by: TJ Cline

What a great article, all women need to read this. Just like Shakespeare this beautifull article speaks the truth to every generation.

Posted by: CRASHMAN

Posted by: Crono1000

A good wife always knows her place.

damn straight

Posted by: Little Wing

i have to agree that the american family as a whole was a lot better off back then. i think a lot of relationships were too. how is a man going to treat a woman who values him and his contribution to the family enough to show it by being a good wife? a few statements were too much of course but the premise is sound.

Posted by: Little Wing

Originally Posted by Crono1000

damn straight

i thought you wanted to be the wife?

Posted by: Flex

Originally Posted by rockgazer69

i have to agree that the american family as a whole was a lot better off back then. i think a lot of relationships were too. how is a man going to treat a woman who values him and his contribution to the family enough to show it by being a good wife? a few statements were too much of course but the premise is sound.

good answer

Posted by: ponyboy

They forgot about important things like blowjobs. How is that possible?

Posted by: Little Wing

well i think there is a saying, a good wife is a lady in the livingroom and a whore in the bedroom. couldn't print that back then but it was pretty common knowledge and it covered the whole blowjob isue..

Posted by: Jodi

Originally Posted by Jodi

Actually thats total bullshit. Especially about Teen Pregnancy. Instead parents shamely took their daughters out of their public school and put them in specials schools and homes to have their babies. All this being done and never a word of it spoken to anyone. I know several people that this happened to. An now they have children older than me out there but because it was all so secret there were never any documents about the adoptions or they were destroyed and they can't even find their children that they didn't want to give up in the first place but were forced to.

Yes divorce was scowled upon but there were more cheating husbands than there are now but the wives couldn't do anything about it. They just had to suck it up. Things were just as bad then its just that it was all kept to family secrecy because people were ashamed. Now its public and people think its worse and ITS NOT! At least now women get to speak up for themselves. Thats the difference, and I'm glad its changed. An I don't think taking God out of schools had anything to do with it.

I will quote myself on the same subject that I responded to a few years ago. IT'S TOTAL BULLSHIT!

Posted by: The Monkey Man

Originally Posted by rockgazer69

well i think there is a saying, a good wife is a lady in the livingroom and a whore in the bedroom. couldn't print that back then but it was pretty common knowledge and it covered the whole blowjob isue..

Thass wut I'm talkin about

Posted by: Little Wing

i do know stories of girls getting shipped off to have their babies, in fact it happened to my grandfather's sister, but i really don't think there was as much teen sex. i mean come on who hasn't heard of 13 yr olds having "rainbow" parties? back then kids didn't shoot up their teachers and classmates, no where near as many kids drank alcohol, did drugs, committed crimes or killed themselves. i honestly believe a lot of the problems today's children face are a result of women having careers instead of attending to their family first and foremost. i worked in the campus daycare while i attended college and can tell you point blank daycare is no place for a child. they get up before they are ready to n are rushed out of mommy's life and her work day is done before the child sees her again and i really don't think a woman with that job on her plate is going to have what it takes to meet the emotional needs of a child when she is as tired and strained from the day's pace as her child is. a woman belongs at home once she decides she wants a family period. society has gone to hell in a hand basket cuz women were convinced otherwise.

Posted by: ALBOB

Originally Posted by rockgazer69

who hasn't heard of 13 yr olds having "rainbow" parties?

Ummm.........I guess that would be me. Care to explain what the hell you're talking about?

Posted by: The Monkey Man

The entire US work force is problem ridden...

White Collar is overworked and not compensated, you are expected to live at the office and neglect your family...

Blue Collar is hard working, but over compensated, and selfish...

All are hired in with "0" vacation, and are expected to work 50-60 hrs per week.

Where is the R&R?... Everyone is on Prozac, or Zoloft!?

(IIIIIIIIIIIIII'm... not stressed out)

Posted by: Jodi

I disagree completely. Most families are dual income now a days and not every child from these families are messed up because of this. It's a personal choice IMO and having good values, morals and love for your children will help raise your child into a healthy family just as well as mother staying home with their children. I personally feel it could be worse to have the father gone all day and the child home with their mother. It's promotes a one sided way of upbringing where as if both parents work during the day and are home at night they equally take the responsibitly of raising children.
Not all day cares are created equal that is for sure but doing your research and finding a daycare that promotes your values is part of the responsibility of raising children.

Posted by: Little Wing

there have been a few shows like dr. phil that evaluated a family where the woman worked and there are cases where it actually puts more of a financial strain on the family to have the woman work outside the home. once take out meals, dry cleaning, gas, daycare and so on were factored in they were losing money on top of everything else. and i don't know but i think today's men are far more likely to cheat because women being men too has really lowered the expectation of what a man is supposed to be, what society expects from him. back then men had more to be proud of and strength of character was more valued. i think being a man was easier when women were still women.

Posted by: The Monkey Man

Europeans get 30-60 vacation days per year, depending...

(How much time could you spend getting to know your kids w/that)

Also I blame the GOVT, and (some) family groups, for attempting to intervien and steal a parents right/ability to make common sense decisions regarding thier own kids...

(although, I talk to some REAL spacecadet parents also)

Posted by: Jodi

I see that as degrading to women.

I agree for some families it is not financial feasible to have dual income and therefore other means are necessary. And off subject a bit but IMO, Dr. Phil is a quack!

The only difference between a man and women is that fact that women were designed to bear children. We were not designed to be the sole contributor in the child's upbringing. Fathers, teachers and mentors should play a big role as well and typically what happens in a family is when the father is the only one working or leaving the children for the day the father never plays the full parent role because they see it as the "mother's job" This is just downright wrong and the children are the ones to pay for it in the end.

Posted by: Little Wing

the daycare i worked at was wonderful. the problems i saw was with the children. they were hurt and angry at being parked there every day. they would pine away for their parent but often act mad at the parent when it was time to go home. every kid was sick all winter because if 1 had a cold they all had it and a lot of times parents would rather bring a sick child in than miss work. it was a pathetic daily existence for a child. children were in diapers still at ages 3 and four and had to at times have their diapers changed by new staff they were not yet comfortable with. i worked with a bunch of truly loving people but we were not the best thing for the kids at all. kids should be raised by their parents.
back then too young women didn't leave their newborns in toilets or trash cans to die. little girls learn to be mothers by being mothered. sadly that lesson is one our society is placing far too little value on.

Posted by: Little Wing

Albob a "rainbow party" is a bunch of guys getting oral sex from a bunch of girls. the girls see who can get their mouth down on the guy by leaving lipstick prints hence the term rainbow. the winner gets to make the guy cum. this is what kids do in each other's homes while the parents are at work... lovely

Sexual Rainbow Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The term Rainbow Party was popularized by a discussion on the popular television show of Oprah Winfrey in October 2003 in the context of a perceived trend of increasing sexual promiscuity among American youth and the lack of awareness on the part of parents of the putative sexual practices of their offspring.

A rainbow party is a group sex event in which fellatio is performed on one man or several men in sequence by partners wearing various colours of lipstick, thus leaving a "rainbow" of colours on the subject's penis.

It is rumored that girls like Rainbow parties because they are able to "mark" depth and turn it into a contest and guys like it for obvious reasons. Data, however, relating to the actual prevalance or enjoyment of such activity is scarce.

In 2005, author Paul Ruditis wrote a controversial book about the topic, titled "Rainbow Party"

Posted by: Jodi

See alot of that has to do with how the children are raised and nothing to do with the fact that the parents were working or not. A bad parent is a bad parent. More than likely the day care was probably a clean and safer environment than home.

I bet if we had the news like we have now and people were less secretive about family issues you would have seen alot more of the similar issues that we have today.

Posted by: The Monkey Man

[QUOTE=Jodi]More than likely the day care was probably a "cleaner" and safer environment than home.QUOTE]

??????????????

Yeah, but in a twisted sense, BITD if you beat your kid, they just had to do what they were told, now the kids have the impression that they are in charge.

And some parents don't challenge that??????????

Posted by: Jodi

LOL, Did I ever claim that my typing is always perfect?

Posted by: The Monkey Man

Originally Posted by Jodi

LOL, Did I ever claim that my typing is always perfect?

I'm saying that most daycare's contain more germs than a bio-weapons lab

Posted by: Jodi

Depends on the daycare. All I was saying is that usually if the children that come in to the day care that don't appear to be well cared for and properly behaved may come from a home that is treated in the same manner.

Posted by: Crono1000

Originally Posted by rockgazer69

i thought you wanted to be the wife?

hell if tit worked and let me stay at home all day I'd gladly do exactly what the article says.

Posted by: Little Wing

i worked in a senior's home while i was pregnant with Tesla. there was a lady there named margaret who talked to me about having been sexually abused. she said it happened a lot then too it just wasn't talked about. for her it was over 50 yrs past but the hurt in her voice said time had healed nothing. it was sad.
and i knew some of the people who's kids i helped care for at the university daycare. they were absolutely great parents. clean, very child oriented homes... leaving others to raise your children just in the core of what a human family is meant to be is not natural. when a child is a child they are meant to be with their mother. how many nanny cams have caught abuse? daycare providers get caught drugging babies to keep them quiet? parents have researched providers and gotten exemplary reports and still ended up with dead kids. i am supposed to take this chance with my kids? and it is a chance no matter how much you think you know the place you are leaving them. some psycho with a car or gun in the middle of a bad divorce... yea we all heard that on the news .
i liked working and i miss it but for the next 11 years my responsibility is here.

Posted by: Jodi

And you have that right. To each their own.

Unfortunately there was alot of sexually abused children back in the day too and families were hush hush. Mother's knew but were too afraid to speak up out of fear of society and their husbands leaving them or no-one beleiving them. Now women have that voice that they never had and people are less afraid to speak up, leave their husbands and society has acknowledged the issue. And this goes for many things such as abuse as well. IMO, I'd rather have that voice than have to accept things the way they were.

Posted by: Little Wing

i never knew an adult would do that to a child but it happened to a couple of girls i grew up with. i'll never understand the silence. why they didn't tell.

Posted by: gr81

I gotta disagree withthis RG, I think that they just were better at appearing to be better off. things aren't what they seem. Women had zero options, how good could therelationsihps have been with society configured this way. Todaya people just are more vocal about their split ups and all that. Think of the amount of people there were in relationships they absolutely didn't want to be in, trapped. Is that better, or does it just look better.. feel me?

Posted by: Little Wing

i think then or now the thing to do is honor your partner and i just think back then people were more likely to take that seriously. i really doubt women were terribly miserable being wives and mothers as opposed to today being that and holding down a job. when you have too many irons in the fire quality suffers somewhere and i don't think it's fair to children to be the sacrificial lamb for today's modern bread winning mom.

Posted by: The Monkey Man

That's it you are all fired!!!

Turn in your children now. They will be raised and cared for by the Military.

Go back to work and forget....

Posted by: Little Wing

and ask scott peterson if divorce is so easy now. people make messes out of their relationships for a lot of reasons the rest of us will never understand. trapped in a bad one is as prevalent today as yesteryear.

Posted by: The Monkey Man

Originally Posted by The Monkey Man

That's it you are all fired!!!

Turn in your children now. They will be raised and cared for by the Military.

Go back to work and forget....

Posted by: irontime

Thanx for bumping that I completely missed it the first time around

That is getting a front spot on the bulletin board at work

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

A Good Wife's Guide

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34