-->
Pages: 1

ALA dosages....what's the range?


(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)




Posted by: DaMayor

I have read several articles concerning the effects and benefits of Alpha Lipoic Acid. However, the dosage recommended on the product I use (100mg tabs...1 tab per day) varies greatly from the articles I've read here/via other threads, which ranged from 200mg per day to 1200mg per day. What would you folks say is the most common dose used to aid in recovery/decrease BF?



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Well...I use it to intensify my other antioxidants and lower insulin resistance....

I prefer 300 mgs of Sustained Release (both Jarrow and Source Naturals have this)..and only take it in the morning (lasts 7-9 hours, as I'm carb deplete at night.)

There are two forms of ALA btw.....most companies mix "S" and "R"


DP



Posted by: DaMayor

*attempts to re-locate to proper (suppliments) forum*
I see. What would be the benefit of ingesting 1200mg a day? (Other than that ($) of the manufacturer?)
Would this be used in cases of severe insulin resistence?



Posted by: Dr. Pain

More is better to a point....type 2 diabetics benefit big time, it's expensive and unless time released, your gonna have to remeber to take it at intervals.

I think 1200 mgs is overkill unless you have a very specific problem or see/feel results immediately

I'll move it!

DP



Posted by: DaMayor

(Thanks for the move)
My concern/interest in ALA is motivated by my belief that I have become much more insulin resistant ....to the point that it has interfered with my progress, or reduction of BF, and it appears that I am stalled metabolically. (my Dr. mentioned this in the past, but not due to any extreme worry at the time) Now, I've brought this up in the past, and received great advice, so my case history isn't warranted here (again). I was just wondering if ALA would help expedite a decrease in BF while maintaining LM.
Time released? Yikes. I haven't noticed if the brand I've been taking even notes this info. on the bottle. I've been taking 600mg in the a.m., but may adjust this to 200mg X3 daily. Sensible?



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Yes....more sensible, but depending how your carbs fall....you may just want to reduce or consolidate the dosage to certain times!

I wouldn't expect any miracles, heck..you may not even notice the results...except over months and months....just know that it is a good supp and worth taking!

DP



Posted by: Britney

DP, I was thinking of getting some, but never ordered yet. Think I should?



Posted by: DaMayor

I hate to sound like the Walmart representative..again...but Walmart carries ALA.



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Quote:
Originally posted by Britney
DP, I was thinking of getting some, but never ordered yet. Think I should?

I'd rather see you do 3 (4 capsules) or more grams of CLA a day (Tonalin)

DP



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Pain

I think 1200 mgs is overkill unless you have a very specific problem or see/feel results immediately
Me too, but some find large amounts useful after the carb loads on a CKD.

I know of some who spread 2-3g out over the day too. I definately think this could be problematic with regards to blood pH though.

I believe one lad was using it during his gear cycle for the anti-oxidant properties and others have looked at it and not realised that, so they're using high amounts too.



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Good Morning Rob!

Would you delini8 on "S" (Walmart) versus "R" for the masses for me please?


DP



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Not really. I've got bad guts.



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

But don't let that dampen your day. I know how much you worry for my health.



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Sorry...take some ALA and call me in the morning......j/k

Feel better!


DP



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy
But don't let that dampen your day. I know how much you worry for my health.
Hey...I care... Really!

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Pain


Would you delini8 on "S" (Walmart) versus "R" type ALA for the masses for me please?


DP




Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Pain
Sorry...take some ALA and call me in the morning......j/k

Feel better!


DP
I do actually have some ALA (got it just the other day) but i'm sving it for further down the line during this cut for other purposes.


I haven't read much on ALA for a while, but i do believe the S isomer is more for anti-oxidant properties and the R isomer is more for the insulin mimicking properties.

I think.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy
Me too, but some find large amounts useful after the carb loads on a CKD.
What about during fairly radical/sustained carb depletion periods? Let's say two to three week period(s) with an average carb intake of 30 grams per day, or less....(e.g. Induction period during the evil Atkins diet, rather than CKD)



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Well they use the large amounts post carb load to get their blood sugar levels down quicker to help get back into ketosis.

If you go low carb for 3 weeks then such high amounts aren't really necessary, aside from anti-oxidant effects.

But then again, anyone going 3 weeks on low carbs without a carb load is bonkers in my opinion anyway.



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy


But then again, anyone going 3 weeks on low carbs without a carb load is bonkers in my opinion anyway.
TCD is very right here.....think Lifestyle not Induction......you're gonna compromise metabolism, thyroid functin and IGF levels going that long!

DP



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Yeah, i'd bet your workouts would be crappy too.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Pain
TCD is very right here.....think Lifestyle not Induction......you're gonna compromise metabolism, thyroid functin and IGF levels going that long!

DP
I was only using the 2-3 week period hypothetically. Although I realize Atkins calls for a minimum of two weeks for the "induction" period. As far as metabolism is concerned, again hypothetically, wouldn't suplimenting with higher doses of fish and/or flax oils help regulate leptin levels, etc? (i.e., fend off the "starvation" response)
Workouts are never a bed of roses anyway....




Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Fish oils are good.

They can help alter the permeability of the brain to leptin (over time).

Basically, they can assist in regulating your setpoint.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy
Basically, they can assist in regulating your setpoint.
Could you define/expound on 'setpoint'?

*TCD sends PM to DP....Man, this guy is dense!*




Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Where your body wants to be regarding bodyfat level.

You know those skinny little bastards who eat loads and yet maintain their skinny little bitch status? They have low bodyfat setpoints.

And you know those people who eat shit loads and stay fat? yeah, they have higher setpoints.

Your body regulates loads of complicated stuff so you stay there.

Those with low setpoints tend to have lower appetites, regulate hunger better so overall they eat less and if they overeat one day, their appetites go down for the next few days and their metabolism speeds up to expend the calories and weight they put on in that day of overfeeding.

Those with high setpoints have bigger appetites and can't control hunger as good so have tendancies to eat more.

It's possible to get below setpoint and maintain it, but it's a bastard cause your body throws loads at you to get you to eat more, such as raging appetite, hunger pangs, cravings etc...

It's all measured by leptin (or at least, leptin is the major player in regulating all this).



Posted by: DaMayor

Okay, what about those who, just by their physiological nature/not as an act of will don't have cravings, don't require a great deal/can go without eating (if this were required for whatever weird reason) yet are able to maintain or gain "weight" anyway?



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Sorry, my brain is really misty today and i'm having trouble deciphering sentences. Can you rephrase that?



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy
Where your body wants to be regarding bodyfat level.

You know those skinny little bastards who eat loads and yet maintain their skinny little bitch status?
-----This Ain't me.

And you know those people who eat shit loads and stay fat?
-----This Ain't me either.

Your body regulates loads of complicated stuff so you stay there.
-----Gotcha....Understood.

Those with low setpoints
" tend to have lower appetites, regulate hunger better so overall they eat less"----This applies to me.

"and if they overeat one day, their appetites go down for the next few days"-----This applies to me as well.

"and their metabolism"-----Don't have one of these.

" speeds up to expend the calories and weight they put on in that day of overfeeding." -----Can't relate.....its still right here. (points to abs/obliques)

Those with high setpoints have bigger appetites and can't control hunger as good so have tendancies to eat more.

It's possible to get below setpoint and maintain it, but it's a bastard cause your body throws loads at you to get you to eat more, such as raging appetite, hunger pangs, cravings etc...

It's all measured by leptin (or at least, leptin is the major player in regulating all this).
In other words....What do you call individuals who don't experience cravings, who don't eat loads of grub, yet maintain above "normal" rather, above 'healthy' levels of BF?
Metabolically stalled? Dead?

Okay, so lets say this same "metabolically screwed" individual increases calories to re-set the metabolism, yet begins to gain "weight" before reaching, let's say, 2800 calories per day.....when everyone who has advised this guy (me) has recommended going as high as ~3000-3500. All of this while taking typical suppliments and working out 3+ times a week.
My point is, based on your statements above, I share characteristics with both high and low setpoint groups.
I've received some good advice, but with little results.....hence, I must be a hybrid of the two groups mentioned above.
Confused now? I sure am.



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

Quote:
Originally posted by DaMayor
In other words....What do you call individuals who don't experience cravings, who don't eat loads of grub, yet maintain above "normal" rather, above 'healthy' levels of BF?
Metabolically stalled? Dead?
Liars usually.

Haha! Joking, but most studies show that most people either drastically underestimate their total calorie intake or drastically overestimate it.

Have you actually tried dieting with a calorie deficit?

I'm guessing you're not getting cravings because your calories aren't in deficit and therefore your leptin isn't dropping.

You are cutting, right?



Posted by: Twin Peak

http://www.1fast400.com/store/produc...roducts_id=457

Describes r-ALA, and compares it to s-ALA.



Posted by: Dr. Pain

Thanks TP...we have another one floating around here too...unless it was from a spammer we deleted!



DP



Posted by: ikam

I've used 3-4 grams a day of the racemic kind. I tended to take upwards of a gram if my carb meals were above 50 grams.

Did it help, yes!

Now I'm taking 1.5 grams and it doesn't seem to be near as effective as before.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by The_Chicken_Daddy
Liars usually.
.....Thanks.

Haha! Joking, but most studies show that most people either drastically underestimate their total calorie intake or drastically overestimate it.
.....I've been logging this info as acurately as possible. Currently, I'm at ~2600 calories per day. It has varied, but not drastically.

Have you actually tried dieting with a calorie deficit?
.....Not yet. I was advised to continue increasing calories until I noticed a consistant weight, or slight increase....then to hold for a week or two before decreasing calories. (Sound fairly acurate, DP?....You and, I believe TP, gave great input on this not too long ago, as well as P-Funk, who has been a great help.)

I'm guessing you're not getting cravings because your calories aren't in deficit and therefore your leptin isn't dropping.
.....The only cravings I've had recently were for sugary foods. The weird thing about this is that I've never depended on sweet stuff....at least not during adulthood.

You are cutting, right?
.....Well, that's debatable...Not in the traditional sense, but yes. I mean, I assume that most of those here who go on a "cut" only have ten to fifteen pounds to lose. I'm working on more like 30lbs here, so I don't know that I should treat it like a traditional cut.





Posted by: Twin Peak

Sounds like you are still resetting your metabolism and doing well. What is the concern?



Posted by: DaMayor

Well, I've been weighing in weekly. After a month...no change. My"weight" fluxuated within one pound. Two months, no change. All this time I'm increasing calories. Last week, I gained 5-6 pounds in what seemed like a day. I suspected some sort of fluid retention.....and I was right. weighed again last night just out of curiosity, and now I'm down the 5 lbs. I gained. WATER.
My concern is, based on the 12cal's per lb. of bodyweight required to 'maintain', as well as what everyone has told me here, I should be taking in roughly 2856-2880 calories to Maintain my current weight. I have just barely reached ~2500-2600 cal's and noticed weight gain. So naturally, I got bent about it.
It has never taken me so long to lose weight, I think that's the rub...coupled with the insulin resitance issue....and I'm getting impatient.



Posted by: Twin Peak

I understand impatiece. But when you started you were *maintaining* at a MUCH lower calorie level no? So this is a big deal!!! Personally, I'd keep bumping it until you get a real (not water) gain, and then cut back. Hopefully you'll begin to lose at that point. If not, you can add some cardio.

You have done a nice job of resetting. Good for you.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by Twin Peak
I understand impatiece. But when you started you were *maintaining* at a MUCH lower calorie level no?
.....True. I believe I was eating about 1300-1500 cals roughly.

If not, you can add some cardio.
.....Shhhhhhh. What are you doing? Don't wake up the anti-cardio monster!
At the advice of many folks here...(offered all at once, in sort of a group chant sorta thing) I was told to ditch the C-word. I have.
Although at this point, I would be willing to lose a small amount of muscle in order to lose a great deal of fat.

You have done a nice job of resetting. Good for you.
....Thanks, man. Still working on it.




Posted by: Twin Peak

Happy now? You should be.

For the record, I AM THE (self proclaimed) LEADER of the anti-cardio movement, if y ou remember.

That said, if you are doing everything else, and have dropped cals and not losing BF (as opposed to weight) than you can add 2-3 short HIIT sessions.

BTW, you have DOUBLED YOUR FUCKING CALORIE INTAKE AND ARE MAINTAINING WEIGHT AND YOU ARE NOT TOTALLY PSYCHED????

If I remember my post correctly, seems I was dead on, with my advice.



Posted by: DaMayor

Quote:
Originally posted by Twin Peak

BTW, you have DOUBLED YOUR FUCKING CALORIE INTAKE AND ARE MAINTAINING WEIGHT AND YOU ARE NOT TOTALLY PSYCHED????
.....I'd be a lot more psyched if I had decreased my BF...NOTICEABLY..somewhere. Maybe I should say Dramatically. Like I said, in the past, I've just had more dramatic results. This time, I had planned on two or three months to lose the fat, but it looks more like a year. This experience has just been frickin' weird. Damn bizarre.

If I remember my post correctly, seems I was dead on, with my advice.
.....HA! And all this time I thought DP was the conceited one!
Thanks man.



Posted by: The_Chicken_Daddy

So let's just clarify:

You don't get cravings because your leptin isn't dropping because your calories are not in deficit (for any significant amount of time).

You must have a slower metabolism compared to the "norm", whatever that may be, so you find you maintain weight on lower than usual calories. 12kcals/lb for cutting is just a guideline, not a rule. Some people have to go really low to shift fat. Sometimes as low as 8kcals/lb (although this is quite extreme and rare).

Your metabolism re-set should do the trick.



Posted by: DaMayor

Sorry TCD, I think I might have unintentionally mislead you from the start. I've been attempting to "re-set" my metabolism, and got a bit anxious about the slow progress. However, since TP made the point that I have (almost) doubled my caloric intake with little to no "weight" gain, I suppose this in itself is progress.



Posted by: Twin Peak

BINGO!



Posted by: DaMayor

Have I told you lately that you're my hero?
(Other than DP, that is. )



Posted by: Twin Peak

No, but thanks.



Posted by: DaMayor

I meant that in a perfectly straight, testosterone driven sort of way, y'know.
Whelp, would you look at the time! Time to go slam a protein shake.....allllllrighty then. Okay....

Hint: DaMayor is has a tendency to be a smart ass.




(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38