Prohormones vs Hormones [Forum Archive]

Pages: 1

Prohormones vs Hormones

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: SJ69

Ok, this is probably a stupid question, but I've been doing some research and have a couple questions.
Does 1-ad really work?
If it does increase your Test levels then it will tell your body to slow production becasue there's too much just like with 'roids.
Everyone says you can't just take a couple d-bols a day bc that's not enough, but it HAS to better than taking a couple 1-ad's because all the adnro will not convert into test, but ALL the d-bol is already there in anabolic form.
SO I guess why is it a good idea to take a a few 1-ad a day, but not a good idea to take a couple d-bol a day?
BTW the d-bol seems to be cheaper if you can get it.
And to top it all off wouldn't you be WAY better off taking Anavar than any prohormone, Anavar doesn't aromatize and everyone who takes prohormones are worried about gyno. It seems then, following my logic (Which may be flawed) Anavar would be a better, safer, more effective and cheaper "supplement"
Any thoughts?

Posted by: Mudge

Quote:

Originally posted by SJ69
If it does increase your Test levels then it will tell your body to slow production becasue there's too much just like with 'roids.

What do you think? Many things shut down test production and are not even test, so the answer is yes. There is a post cycle for a reason, not just to make more money. Anavar will shut you down as well, it does NOT have to be test to turn off test production.

Quote:

And to top it all off wouldn't you be WAY better off taking Anavar than any prohormone, Anavar doesn't aromatize and everyone who takes prohormones are worried about gyno.

Primarily idiots get gyno, and you should know it is avoidable. Unless you have a massive bodyfat percentage what are you afraid of it for, gyno from prohormones?

There is the claim that anavar screws with HDL/LDL very badly, I do not know if this is true or not and really dont care much. Anavar is expensive and doesn't give you much in the way of gains, if you are so in fear of side effects then why touch anything, stick to your creatine.

Posted by: SJ69

Just trying to figure out the best risk/reward trade off for myself.
Still think I'll do Sust 200mg/wk + dbol 10mg/Day, keeping Tamoxafin on hand if needed and using it in the post cycle about 2-3 wks latter.
Although this 1-test they've beeen talking about on the supplements board sounds interesting.
When Androsteindione first came out I tried it and noticed no difference and everything I read about it at that time seemed to indicate you had to take boatloads of it $$$$ for just a small, very temporary spike in Test, so I kind of nixed the idea of PH's.
Just exploring all options, so far the tried and true - Sustanon -is where I'm at, no fear, just caution.

Posted by: Mudge

Andro sucks.

Posted by: maddog1

Got plenty of Andro left, you can have it free of charge, just send your addy

Posted by: ZECH

1-ad does work.
1-ad and d-bol and are not even close to being the same. Got to compare apples to apples.

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Prohormones vs Hormones

Article Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60