|
|
|
Originally posted by Var Is it available already??? I didnt see anything on pn. |
|
Originally posted by flexster Ive been waiting for sledge to bring this stuff out for like 2 months now. On all the other sites, he keeps saying another few days, another few days. Im to the point of going to Kilo to get it. |
|
Originally posted by SJ69 maybe through this in with some m-1-t?? Is this a steroid already or does it need to be converted like 1 AD? |
|
Originally posted by IronSlingah www.kilosports.com |
|
Originally posted by prolangtum it is an active steroid. stronger than M 1T better than M 1T I have used it. Just for fun (as i love to rub it in peoples faces, lol) 90 1mg tabs will retail anywhere from $40-$60. I bought 1 gram for $16 bwahahahahahaha |
|
Originally posted by dg806 Interesting fact I found. From Loki............... Also, another issue is that the actual, tested lab assays for 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxyestra-4,9(10)dien-3-one seem to just be, well, incorrect-- it's far more anabolic in humans than the levator ani assays on it have indicated. I mean, it scores a: 1. 200 - 2. 300 - 3. 1000 (vs. 17a-MT Oral-- the 'standard')[1.V.P/2. S.V./3. L.A.] which puts it roughly about 110% the potency of 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-5a-androst-1-en-3-one (Methyl-1-Test). But-- just between 'you and me' -- well... It's a LITTLE stronger than even that... |
|
Originally posted by tomas101 huh? |
|
Originally posted by Twin Peak I am not one for supps and anabolics to have much of an effect in the way of efficacy or sides, but here is my comparison. M1T -- most anabolic compound I have used M-D -- slightly less anabolic than M1T, but not markedly so. Edge: M1T M1T -- mild sides at 30-40 mg, slight headaches and such. M-D -- no sides to speak of at all at 4-5 mg per day. Edge: M-D Overall: if you can handle the sides of M1T, given the pricetag and the extra anabolic effect, I'd stick with M1T. If you can't handle the sides, M-D is an excellent alternative. Either way, Sledge is your man. |
|
Originally posted by dg806 Not trying to cause an arguement, but what I have seen is opposite. Better gains with M-Dien and no sides. Most people are saying M-Dien is better? |
|
Methyldienolone is supposed to be better (more anabolic, less androgenic) than M1T, and has less side effects, and you only need 1-3 mg's per day.
Product Summary Methyldienolone is the trademarked name for the prosteroid 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxyestra-4,9(10)dien-3-one. Without a doubt, Methyldienolone is the most potent prosteroid ever developed and sold in the world to date as it is about 1.1X as anabolic as Methyl-1-Testosterone is while being only 15% as androgenic. These characteristics allow Methyldienolone to cause the similar positive effects that Methyl-1-Testosterone users have reported with far fewer side effects. Additionally, because it is not a "1-ene" compound, the typical lethargy and mild depression found in users of Methyl-1-Testosterone and other 1-testosterone products is not present with Methyldienolone use. Due to it's fairly high Anabolic-to-Androgenic ration (A:A), the effects of Methyldienolone have been described by users as "Winstrol like" or "Winstrol Turbo" or "a hybrid between Parabolan and Winstrol". This last comparison is right on the money as Methyldienolone is a very close chemical cousin to the most potent steroid on the planet bar none, that being methyltrenbolone (aka methyltrienolone). In fact, Methyldienolone is a close homolog of methyltrienolone, the singular difference between the two being a double bond at Carbon #11 found on methyltrienolone. So how potent is Methyldienolone? Users are recording fantastic gains in lean muscle mass and decreases in body fat with only 1-3mg per day. www.kilosports.com sells it: http://kilosports.com/productdesc.cf...ETHYLDIENOLONE |