|
Originally posted by camarosuper6 10. Robert Parish- Don't know about that 9. Patrick Ewing- Yeah Ewing could be top ten 8. Bill Walton- No way in hell Walton is top ten, not a chance 7. David Robinson-I'd put D-Rob higher personally. I think he is top 5-6 6. Moses Malone- Hmmmm, maybe more of a top 15 center 5. Shaq Oneal- Defn a top 5, but still lacks what the all time centers like Hakeem and Jabbar have. I think he is a step away from that level 4. Hakeem Olajuwan- Hakeem, top three personally, much better player than Russell. Think about the context of who each center played against. Hakeem was much more talnted IMO 3. Bill Russell- Not a top five center, certainly not better than Robinson or Oneal 2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar- what else can you say, the most prolific scorer ever besides MJ! The hook wsa unstappable 1. WILT CHAMBERLAIN... You have to agree with this, he may have been the cockiest Bastard that walked gods green earth, but he was more dominant than even Jordan, relatively. Possibnly the most dominant athlete in any sport ever! Next....
|
|
Originally posted by gr81 sorry bro, but there ain't no way in hell shaq is the center that Wilt was, not even close!! shaq doesn't have the dominence that Wilt did. Shaq is too inconsistent nowadays. he is great, but he ain't no Wilt. I mean, Wilt is arguably the greatest player ever, I say arguable b/c Jordan was better IMO, but Shaq can't compare to either. |
|
Originally posted by Flex i have to disagree. There was ONE good center in the league, Bill Russell, when Wilt dominated, (who, by the way, used to contain Wilt every time they played.....11 championship rings). On the other hand, Shaq has DOMINATED every good modern day center he has played against. The admiral, the dream, Ewing, Duncan (even though he's a PF), Mourning, Mutombo.......you name it, Shaq's dominated them. and they didn't coin the term "Hack-a-Shaq" b/c they could stop him. they foul the shit outta him and force him to shoot free throws cuz that's his only weakness, and if they didn't, he'd be COMPLETELY unstoppable. and if you wanna get really nittygritty, put Shaq vs. Wilt one-on-one, and Shaq would shut his skinny ass out, no question. |
|
Originally posted by camarosuper6 Sure hes dominant, but mostly at the expense of many NBA rules. If he didnt plummet everyone and run over people, he wouldnt be where he is today. BTW Olajuwan toasted Shaq...... |
I truely believe Hakeem in his prime and Shaq in his prime, although an AWESOME matchup, Hakeem would prevail. Shaq cannot be stopped physically, but Hakeem was probably the greatest defensive center of the last 2 decades. If anyone had a chance at stopping shaq, or at least playing nose to nose, its hakeem. Shaq's main weakness IMO is his defense, where Hakeems moves would destory Shaq (If they can destory a super quick David Robinson, then Shaqs much slower defensive reactions would be silly ).
|
Originally posted by austinite Oh yeah! NBA fans! The Final Four is great, but I'm an NBA man. Top 10 Centers? Kareem Russell Wilt Shaq Akeem Walton Tim Duncan Ralph Sampson Mo Malone Ewing |
|
Originally posted by I'm Trying My top ten... 10. Vlade Divac- One of the best passing big men of all time next to Robinson. 9. Parrish- Like I said in an earlier post not as dominate as he possibly could have been due to having Bird, McHale and company around him. 5. O'Neal- Not as dominate as he should be. I'm sorry but he should be averaging over 30pts 20boards and 5 to 6 blocks per game. Especially what the officials give him night in and night out. Please feel free to pick this apart. PLEASE back it up though with good fact if you do!! |
|
Originally posted by gr81 Anyone who thinks that Shaq in his prime was better then Hakeem in his prime, is absolutely nuts. By the wat, the less talented than teh Laker rockets won two NBA championships at a time when the talent in the league was MUCH tougher, and they beat the Magic with Oneal, and swept them 4 straight. Hakeem had and all around game and played like it every night, where is Shaq comes to camp overweight every year. Shaq is great, but he could be greater |
|
Originally posted by I'm Trying What about shaq before Kobe became as good as he is? What about when he was with Orlando?? Shaq's other weakness is keeping his f-ing yap shut. If Shaq was smart enough he would have worked on that part of his game to improve it in stead of putting out those HORRIBLE rap albums and movies. Who do you rate the BEST player in the Nba then Flex?? |
|
Originally posted by I'm Trying I'd put Mutumbo in the top ten before I'd put Bill Walton. Now if you're figuring Walton's college career into this then maybe but this is pure NBA and Walton doesn't even belong. |
|
Originally posted by Flex Well, when Shaq was on Orlando, alls he did was pull down entire backboards, but he wasnt as dominant yet. the best player in the league is Shaq. IF the NBA had a draft, and put EVERY player in the draft pool, guarenteed Shaq would go #1. The ONLY reason he wouldn't is cuz he is getting old, and the team with the 1st pick may draft for the future w/younger guys....i.e. Kobe would be 1st if Shaq wasn't, then prob. Duncan or Garnett..... |
|
Originally posted by gr81 yes I have, he isn't top ten bro, sorry |
|
Originally posted by gr81 Shaq is NOT the best player in the league, he is the best at what he does definately, but not the all around best player in the league. T-Mac is better, Kobe is better, Carter, Duncan, and Garnett are also better all around players than Shaq. Shaq can;t win by himself. |
|
Originally posted by BigBallaGA its not about the rings fool there are tons of people who get rings just by sitting on the bench and being part of the team, that doesnt mean they belong on any list !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! get it right |
|
Originally posted by austinite You're wrong chump. Of course it's not only the ring, but the greatest ones find a way to win championships, not just pile up stats. |
|
Originally posted by jaim91 One could say the same about Wilt - how many rings does he have vs. how many he deserves |
|
Originally posted by BigBallaGA Karl Malone comes to mind as being so much fucking better than most others in the league present and past, yet he hasnt won a ring not because of lack of talent but because of a shitty team.......my point exact !!! when you know what you are talking about come talk to me |
|
Originally posted by camarosuper6 Well Flex my friend I truely believe Hakeem in his prime and Shaq in his prime, although an AWESOME matchup, Hakeem would prevail. Shaq cannot be stopped physically, but Hakeem was probably the greatest defensive center of the last 2 decades. If anyone had a chance at stopping shaq, or at least playing nose to nose, its hakeem. Shaq's main weakness IMO is his defense, where Hakeems moves would destory Shaq (If they can destory a super quick David Robinson, then Shaqs much slower defensive reactions would be silly ).But thats My opinion. ![]() Cant wait to see what I can think up for next thread
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.