|
|
)
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry I think, but I am not positive, that if test levels rise so will aromatase enzyme levels. This would mean you would have to increase the dose of 6-oxo every so often. This would be quite expensive. I guess it's your body's way of telling you, "Fuck off, I'll do what I want." I guess scientists call this homeostasis.
|
I hope. 
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry Here is what would happen. You take the 6oxo and it, as you said, inhibits the aromatase which would lead to a slight increase in test. Not a huge one, but a noticeable one. Your body realizes this and does one of 2 things, increases aromatase enzymes or 5ar. If it increases 5ar, you may lose some coverage up top, get acne, prostatic hypertrophy, etc. Let us assume that this is not the case since your body will also notice a drop in estrogen. So, your body senses increased test and low estrogen. Now, if your body was not using all of the 6oxo to block aromatase before, you will be fine for a bit. Once aromatase production is upregulated enough to where more aromatase is available than there is 6oxo to block it, you will either have to increase the dosage, or use the stuff with no effect. This is why most don't use this kinda stuff to increase test levels, the increase is so small that the body can adjust to the change by slightly increasing production of other enzymes. |
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry And how would it compensate for the testosterone? In the same manner I just described. |
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry That would be the response if it were just out of the physiologoical range, 6 oxo won't give it that much of a boost. Think about it, when you inject test into your body, putting yourself way out of physiological range, the response is to downregulate LH. Using 6 oxo, the response would be so minute that your body would either upregulate aromatase or 5ar since that response is more for fine tuning. |
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry Very true, but I believe the first response would be upregulation of aromatase. First off, Test would still be in normal phyisological limits so the chance LH production would be effected would be minimal at best. Secondly, estrogen would be low, which the body would also detect. With this scenario I would bet good money that aromatase production would increase rather than LH decreasing.. |
|
Originally posted by Dale Mabry Yes, eventually. If the dose of 6oxo you are using is high enough, you would be blocking alot of aromataste and still have excess 6oxo floating around. Eventually, the body would upregulate aromatase maybe even gradually. Eventually this would overwhelm the dosage of 6oxo that you are taking and then you would have to up the dose. Maybe ramping the dose gradually is the key, I don't think many have tried that. Keep in mind I don't know the time frame on this, I bet Pat Arnold may have some insight. It just seems to me that most peeps who have tried it as a standalone have results consistent with this being a relatively quick process. BUT, as you say, this would be on an individual basis and some would respond more quickly. Personally, I would use the money for a thermogenic, but that's just me. On a side note, I had a pal get some Redline, he is an old school guy who thinks nothing that is legal is any good, and he gives it high marks, says he is sweating like a mofo. |
|
Originally posted by gopro Anyway, I think that both of us are making assumptions about how we feel this would go, but only bloodwork could tell for sure. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.