| --> |
or it will be easier to lift.
No really, he says it makes a difference. WELL??? Opinions???????????
|
Originally Posted by PreMier
Plates facing IN always. It does matter.(the weight doesnt change though)
You place the plates flat side out, so that if you put a smaller plate on the outside(say a 45lb then a 10lb next to it) that they fit "snug". |
|
Originally Posted by PreMier
Plates facing IN always. It does matter.(the weight doesnt change though)
You place the plates flat side out, so that if you put a smaller plate on the outside(say a 45lb then a 10lb next to it) that they fit "snug". |
| Plates facing IN always. |
|
Originally Posted by PreMier
In this pic, ALL the numbers are in. All I can say, is its the right way.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by pmech
We have rubber coated plates at my gym, numbers on both sides. I may never be able to lift anything heavy now. I might as well quit now or find a different gym.
|
|
Originally Posted by Sapphire
Chris and I are having a debate regarding how the plates should be placed on the barbell.... numbers/letters facing in or facing out.
I say it doesn't matter, HE says they HAVE to face in. or it will be easier to lift. No really, he says it makes a difference. WELL??? Opinions??????????? |
|
Originally Posted by gopro
Sapphy...Chris doesn't really think it makes a difference, does he?
By the way...I like em facing in just because. |
|
Originally Posted by Sapphire
Chris is sitting right here and insists that YES it does make a difference, cause Arnold says so.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by CowPimp
Think about the physics of the situation. The force of gravity on the bar is the mass x acceleration. Let's say the bar totals 50KG (Mass) with the weights included; the acceleration of gravity is 9.81m/s*s (Seconds are squared) towards the ground. Therefore, the force in the downward direction is 490.5N.
Guess what happens if you flip the weights around? The force in the downward direction is still exactly the same. Therefore, the force required to move the weight in an upward direction is still exactly the same. You can prefer to have the weights facing a certain way, but it makes no difference... |
|
Originally Posted by gopro
Great answer, but do you REALLY think that such detail was needed to figure this one out
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by CowPimp
Apparently it is. I thought people were going to refute this with something simple like, "It's still the same amount of weight!" It appears that simple logic like that isn't enough. I thought it was a little crazy myself, but maybe it will make the difference to Sapphire's man.
|

|
Originally Posted by gopro
I'm still hoping he was just kidding around.
|

That explains IT!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Sapphire
He yells at me when I put them on the other way...
![]() Now he is saying that Lance Armstrong always faces numbers in. That explains IT!!!! |
|
Originally Posted by nikegurl
i like them facing in b/c it's somehow just seems more tidy/consistent and "right"
but then again...i'm kinda nuts ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Sapphire
He yells at me when I put them on the other way...
![]() Now he is saying that Lance Armstrong always faces numbers in. That explains IT!!!! |
|
Originally Posted by CowPimp
I can't believe this thread has continued on for 30 posts. This is hilarious.
|
|
Originally Posted by gopro
Ahhhh, thats what is known in scientific circles as the "LA Factor"...also known as "Chris is a freaking wacko, but he is YOUR wacko, so its ok factor."
|
|
Originally Posted by Saturday Fever
It is an extremely important issue.
please note the sarcasm levels going off the charts |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.