|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
What is it?
What does it do? How natural is it? Would it harm my Liver and kidney? Where can I get it? How much? Is Var really a midget? |
|
Originally Posted by madden player
It is a steroid, or a pro hormone or whatever supp companies wanna call it. It is a androgen (male hormone). It is not natural to supp your body with hormones, but I will admit there are worse things you could be doing or adding to up body.
It is unlikely 1-ad will harm your liver, kidneys, whatever, but the possibility for a negative interaction with the drug is always a possibility. I have never touched any of the OTC juice but all my buddies have tried it and most are not impressed with any of it. Too many sides, not enough gains. If you are interested in 1-ad you can find it anywhere; prices vary so shop around. Var could be a midget, who the fuck cares. |
| Read the PH/PS sticky for more info. |
|
Originally Posted by gococksDJS
1-AD is not a steroid. It is a pro-hormone and it is not the title that a company gives it. Pro-hormones are converted to testosterone. Don't let opinons of uninformed people scare you away from PH/PS use. Yes there can be unwanted side effects, but 1-AD is one of the safest PH's and if you are informed and run a cycle safely you will not see any permanent side effects. Read the PH/PS sticky for more info.
|
|
Originally Posted by madden player
Where did the term Pro-hormone come from?? When I was in school, Androstenedione was an androgen (male sex hormone- or steroid); Hell, I was also under the impression that Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) was a steriod; the term pro hormone was not even around when I was in school. The fact that these sometimes mild androgens ie. 1-androdiol (a hormone that has masculinizing effects) have to be converted to a more powerful steroid in the body means that they are not 'real' steroids/androgens/male sex hormones??
I am sorry but my definition of 'steroid' will never change. |
|
Originally Posted by dg806
Pro hormones are any substance that has to be converted in the liver to form test. A pro-steriod or steriod does not have to be converted because it is already active form.
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
Some conversion still has to take place doesn't it? If it didn't it would already be test in the bottle.
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
Some conversion still has to take place doesn't it? If it didn't it would already be test in the bottle.
|
|
Originally Posted by Twin Peak
1-AD or 1-androstendiol is a PH that converts to 1-testosterone, which is an active hormone (a steroid). |
|
Originally Posted by Twin Peak
No.
A prohormone is not an active hormone. It will have no hormonal effect on the body unless it is connverted to an active hormone. In most cases, there are enzymes in the body that convert the PH to the active hormone. So if you take 100 mg of a PH, not all of it will be converted, and if you don't have the proper enzymes, you will not convert any. A steroid is a type of hormone that does not need conversion. It is already active. And androgen steroid, is a hormone that will exert androgenic effects (enhance male characteristics). An anabolic steroid is one that exherts anabolic effects. And androgenic anabolic steroid is one that does both -- this is just about every steroid used by bodybuilders. They are not all "test". 1-AD or 1-androstendiol is a PH that converts to 1-testosterone, which is an active hormone (a steroid). |
|
Originally Posted by PirateFromHell
I'm glad someone finally pointed this out. How could people think it converts to testosterone?
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
1 ad is the first year after the death of Christ
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
After the birth, dumbass.
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
It's after death dipshit.........that is why it is ad and not ab.
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
AD = anno domini. Not "after death". He died in 33 A.D. Whos the dipshit?
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
AD = anno domini. Not "after death". He died in 33 A.D. Whos the dipshit?
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
After the birth, dumbass.
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
you are, go back and reread how time was tracked back then
|
|
Originally Posted by PirateFromHell
Yes, the calander was different, but AD = anno domini. The term was used to mean the year of our lord. Despite differences on when exactly Jesus was born, the year 1AD should be approximately Christ's first year as a mortal man on this earth.
|
|
Originally Posted by PirateFromHell
Yes, the calander was different, but AD = anno domini. The term was used to mean the year of our lord. Despite differences on when exactly Jesus was born, the year 1AD should be approximately Christ's first year as a mortal man on this earth.
|
|
Originally Posted by topolo
not according to jews for Jesus
|
|
Originally Posted by musclepump
this thread has been hijacked
|
long time ago
|
Originally Posted by du510
If the original poster had done the simplest of research, there wouldnt be this thread in the first place.
The hijacking was done in good fun though, of course. |
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
I did do a search and unfortunately the information that I received was insufficient. However I did get most of my questions answered and in addition to getting them answered I brought a new awareness to the product 1-AD.
I also enjoy being hijacked, bound and gagged |
|
Originally Posted by du510
1-ad sucks
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
LOL.
1-ad sucks |
|
Originally Posted by gococksDJS
wouldn't go back to it after running other cycles but it's great for beginners.
|
|
Originally Posted by maakx
What you mean gococksDJS what other cycles works for you better
Maakx |