Just don't take the M1T after the ban date, you'll be fine. That's my plan for my poly.

so um could any one anwser my Q plz, i just wanna know how long will m1t be detectible in the body

M1T is a real steriod now even before being banned. So the point is can you lie good? I have never heard of a Fire or Police department asking if you have ever taken steriods and even going to the trouble of testing. Why does it matter?

I would just be honest. You can't go wrong with being truthful. Ask the dept or administrator. Tell them that you purchased supplement products previously over the counter through a GNC or whatever and want to know how to answer when asked therefor not interfering with the test.

so um could any one anwser my Q plz, i just wanna know how long will m1t be detectible in the body

If you tell the truth and they don't allow for steriod use, you are screwed out of a job.

Steroid in the manner of the chemistry. But until the ban is in effect, this item to the average Joe was not an illegal steroid. I think Crash should get clarrified what they are asking. Don't read into it so deaply Crash. If they asked you if you ever got a speeding TICKET and you never did but you speeded before would you say yes?

That is a very poor comparison. Let's assume that you have sped, but never got a ticket for doing so. If the question is:

"Have you ever received a speeding ticket?" Then you can truthfully answer "no." But of the question is:

"Have you ever sped?" Then the only truthful answer is "Yes." Anything else and you risk failing the test.

Likewise, for Crash, if the question is:

"Have you ever been arrested for using an anabolic steroid?" OR "Have you ever used an illegal anabolic steroid?" Then he can truthfully answer "No."

However, if the question is simply "Have you ever used an anabolic steroid?" Then he can only truthfully answer "Yes."

I understand it was an AS ... but how was it listed by the FDA? If it was not classified as an AS or was classiefied as a legal AS by the FDA at the time CRASH was taking it... then M1t was not actually a steroid he would be required to ethically provide disclosure on. See my point? Ethics are cut and dried. There is no almost pregnant. If M1t was classified as an AS and under the controlled substance act restrictions then our boy here is screwed. If not than he has a very fine future as a fireman in front of him. That CRASH is good people with a good state of mind and should be allowed in goes without saying.

This would be my guide ... JMHO CRASH.

You are very far off the mark. Reread my first post above. Its not about ethics, its about truthfully answering a question.

M1T is chemically and pharmacologically as steroid. If the question simply is "have you used a steroid" you cannot reconfigure that question into "have you used an illegal steroid" or "have you used a substance classified as a steroid by the FDA". That is nonsense.

BC is making the same point I am. If the department says have you taken an anabolic steroid they are going to give the examples before asking... such as... and then at that point Crash should answer honestly. How many test takers are coincidently PH/PS experts such as yourself You are being critical b/c of your current knowledge. I know National Level BB that use AS and still know shit about M1t.

I would just find out what they are labeling anabolic and answer honestly. Lying at that point will be the most dishonest factor. Thank god it's against the law to administer a polygraph in NJ for employment

You guys are missing my point. You need to understand what the question is. They are not going to list for you the substances they are referring to, they will not know all of the things we are discussing here.

And if you ask "Hmmm, what do you mean by anabolic steroid" you have probably lost the job.

You are very far off the mark. Reread my first post above. Its not about ethics, its about truthfully answering a question.

M1T is chemically and pharmacologically as steroid. If the question simply is "have you used a steroid" you cannot reconfigure that question into "have you used an illegal steroid" or "have you used a substance classified as a steroid by the FDA". That is nonsense.

M1T is chemically and pharmacologically as steroid. If the question simply is "have you used a steroid" you cannot reconfigure that question into "have you used an illegal steroid" or "have you used a substance classified as a steroid by the FDA". That is nonsense.

Camaro and DG have hit half of my point. Let's see if I can't explain the other half more clearly.

A company can determine to not hire you for ANY REASON whatsoever (save for a few protected reasons, see Title VII and the ADEA).

So, for example, if you ever smoked cigarettes, they can choose not to hire you.

Thus, if they ask, whilest you are strapped to a lie detector test, "have you ever smoked a cigarette?" and you have, you are fucked, unless you can fool the test/tester.

End of story. This is neither a legal, nor a moral issue.

Bone, you don't get the import of this post do you?