|
|
|
Still I hear the noises and dad still would not tell me. 
|
Originally Posted by Shae
Well, I do remember going to the park with my dad and uncle when I was 10. We were going to play raquetball at the park. I was told to find an open room to play and I found this blonde lady going down on this man. Me being the naieve girl at the age of 10 ask, "Daddy, what are they doing?" My dad just covered my eyes and dragged me out of the room.
Still I hear the noises and dad still would not tell me. |
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
I didnt really think he'd be stopping over for some making out with you
|
|
Originally Posted by Chain Link
Made me crave some pubic affection too.
|
|
Originally Posted by ponyboy
I was at a banquet once where a guy at the head table was having sex with his g/f (she was sitting on his lap) during the speeches. Probably about 300 people in the room and nobody knew.
Of course he told all of us the next day. |
|
Originally Posted by Flex
Are you saying i shouldn't get head in public anymore?
If anyone says anything to me, i just say "I'm Peter North, Biiiiiiiitch" |
|
Originally Posted by Pepper
Threads like this just remind me just how boring my sex life is.
|
|
Originally Posted by Shae
Is there anyone that has seen anyone that displayed public gross out? I have a story for all of you but I don't think you will like it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
I mean, I enjoy some good making out in public and what not. I dont sit there and make out, but if I want some tongue, hey, thats my business.
If anybody has a problem fuck them, I'm not here to please them anyways. |
I can personally vouch for this
|
Originally Posted by Jenny
I can personally vouch for this |
|
Originally Posted by maniclion
If having a girl in a skirt sit on my lap with her panties pulled to the side in the back of a night club is wrong I don't want to be right.
...... |
manic?
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
oops he said panties, or were they waaaayyyy to the side?
|
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Hi Flex,
Buddy, you CAN get all the head you want - in public. I say it's just fine!!! Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by Shae
Well, there was this one time back in highschool when my mom was driving me home from a school function. I see this one car in front of us with a young couple inside. The lady was at the driver's seat and had her hand nearher man's genitals. And the guy was bouncing up and down like a bunny. I'm like, "Geez! Bad time to give a dude a handjob!"
|
|
Originally Posted by greekblondechic
I hope you're not making barfy faces at me.
|
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
If I was I would have said GBC and not CL
|
|
Originally Posted by greekblondechic
Yeah but his post was in response to mine...
|
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
Yeh, but I wasnt talking about you...
I didnt really think he'd be stopping over for some making out with you, so I figured that he'd be taking care of his problems through some other means. Anyways, this is getting way too much into a flippant remark, and into areas I'm not too comfortable with. Regardless, it wasnt a statement about you GBC. |
|
Originally Posted by greekblondechic
Ok.
|
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
You get offended pretty easily you know
|
|
Originally Posted by cfs3
I'm taking it that you like kinky stuff.
|
I was a young sophmore and I thought all sexual acts were funny. 
|
Originally Posted by maniclion
If you'd stop wearing your wife's shoes and anklets maybe she'd give you more play.
|
|
Originally Posted by Shae
Well, there was this one time back in highschool when my mom was driving me home from a school function. I see this one car in front of us with a young couple inside. The lady was at the driver's seat and had her hand nearher man's genitals. And the guy was bouncing up and down like a bunny. I'm like, "Geez! Bad time to give a dude a handjob!"
|
the side of the road and that way you are not "distracted" from the fine work "at hand" and ultimately the work is "finished" by hopefully someone who is a "master craftsman"... |
Originally Posted by Eggs
I mean, I enjoy some good making out in public and what not. I dont sit there and make out, but if I want some tongue, hey, thats my business.
If anybody has a problem fuck them, I'm not here to please them anyways. |
|
Originally Posted by Flex
PHEW!
Now i can go on with my life. |
|
Originally Posted by John H.
I think if the truth were actually known, those that have any "objections" are really saying they are personally "pissed" because it it not THEM that this is going on with. So to "get even" they bitch about it. This is probably how "religion" first got started too and all the "prohibitions against..." - from completely jealous and inept people who "put themselves in power" over others.
Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by Eggs
John -
Eggs - |
|
Originally Posted by gr81
I am not too crazy about PDA but sneeking off with your guy/girl where you could be seen and doin the damm thang with the thrill of getting caught, that is totally hot. Is there anyone here who would not be down if your girl nudges you in a public place and says to you "fucc me right here right now" b/c if thats so, you need to have your pulse checked... Go Manic!! lol
|
|
Originally Posted by John H.
I think if the truth were actually known, those that have any "objections" are really saying they are personally "pissed" because it it not THEM that this is going on with. So to "get even" they bitch about it. This is probably how "religion" first got started too and all the "prohibitions against..." - from completely jealous and inept people who "put themselves in power" over others.
Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
john boy leave it to you to bring religion into this discussion. i disnt read one post that said they were against pda for religious reasons, yet you automatically start with the anti-religion campain. grow up. why cant you leave a good thread alone without posting your propaganda?
and if a couple wants to use a little danger to spice up the love life. nore power to them |
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
did the children in kinsey's study give consent john? and what the hell are you talking about? when has the religious right acted as you say they have in regards to child abuse? they are the ones fighting hardest against it. the truth is john boy janet jacksons boobs doesnt belong in the halftime show to the super bowl. its live tv and the parents who dont want their kids to see it didnt get the option of first sensorship. with national geographic its a completly different story. your comparing apples to oranges to make your ridiculous point. religion isnt the problem john boy its zealous crack pots like you who make society suffer.
|
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Bio,
Your "religion" has blinded you. And locked you and your brain (which God gave you to utilize to the very best of your ability - which I think you are not living up to - translation" you are lying to God and to yourself) in your own personal prison. Until and unless you are willing to look at ALL SIDES TO EVERYTHING OBJECTIVELY you will never really learn or know or understand much of anything. To attempt to do otherwise is a waste of time on your part. As to "religion" and Janet Jackson - who the hell do you think called the FCC and complained about Janet Jackson and her showing? No red-blooded American Male did. By the way, ALL females HAVE "boobs" - "tits". They come in "pairs", one on each side of the other. I'll let you look up the clinical term. You are in college as a biology/chemistry major right. And just to let you know they are just below eye-level from most Men (you have to stand directly in front of a female and look directly at her at just below eye level (NO, NOT two inches from her - stand back a few feet at least - don't get too close - you might end up "exploding" (I'll explain that in another "session") - they can be small or large depending on each individual and some "protrude" more than on others which means, if that is the case, the female you are looking at is somewhat "well endowded" - and under a bra usually - not always - and under whatever top they are wearing. You probably don't believe me so you might want to walk up to a female and ask them if you can see them so you can "believe". Maybe you will get lucky and she will allow you to really "see" by "feeling them". But remember - DO NOT GET AROUSED because that is VERY WRONG and "god" will "blind ya" just for looking and it is "VERY SINFUL" - that "bump in your pants" you will have to chop off because a "religious zealot" "plucks out the sinful eye" - remember you are a religious zealot and you want to remain "sincere and truthful"... As for child abuse in any form - the "religious right" should be so "dedicated" as they were with Janet Jackson. Of course most "religious zealots" will scream "shame" and "horror" then after they made their "showing" run out the back door and look for the closest female to use and abuse... But they will always "tell others" they are "squeeky clean" and "pure".... Go to www.google.com and type in "Alfred C. Kinsey". Then go to each site listed there. Read what each has to say. Then do your own research into the Man, his work, and the reasons and methodology behind it all. Your "christianity" flows out of every word you type. You express your hatred, bigotry, bias, narrow-mindedness, and tunnel-vision all the time. How do you like living in a tunnel? John H. |
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
What a drunken knave the sea was to cast thee in our way.
|
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
you didnt adress anything i said you idiot. your posts have now reached the comical. they have no relevance other than something to laugh at when someone is bored. i would try and assume your only being satirical in your posts yet i get the impression you actually believe what your typing. i never said anything about religion and janet jackson together, and yet you go on and on about the two as if i had. you also didnt address how exactly the religious right has done nothing for abused children as you implied. and in regards to kinsey not one person on this board supports you on him. i read his book. i still find his methods unscientific and his ethics non-existint. and i hope my chiristianity comes out in the words i type. that was a compliment. john you have such a negative view on things its sad. to imply christians use and abuse women as the norm is assinine. you have your head shoved so far up your own butt you cant hear the truth. by the way john boy how is the tunnel vision with your head shoved up your rectum. you need to wake up and join the real world john boy. the one where the rest of us live.
|
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
What a drunken knave the sea was to cast thee in our way.
|
|
Originally Posted by Flex
John H,
Do unto us all a hugeth favor and go fucketh yourself. |
I sure hope so. You should never have to "suffer" for the need of it anytime. Nothing like having others share your experiences and the fun.|
Originally Posted by John H.
Bio,
Re-read what I said - carefully. To "save you" from yourself it would be a great idea to put you into a room with about 1,000 perfect women (in everyway body-wise) and you have to F**k each one of them until they were satisified - by their definition - and you could not stop until THEY were finished with you. I think you are somehow "plugged up". You NEED an ENORMOUS AMOUNT of "relief"... John H. |
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Rock,
Shakespeare "liked" guys too. John H. |
|
Originally Posted by Flex
John H,
Do unto us all a hugeth favor and go fucketh yourself. |
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Hi Flex,
Kev would understand for sure - he IS a MAN in the TRUEST SENSE OF THE WORD... Did you get that head you needed? In public? I sure hope so. You should never have to "suffer" for the need of it anytime. Nothing like having others share your experiences and the fun.Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by Captain James T. Kirk
Hi Spock,
Kev would understand for sure - he IS a MAN in the TRUEST SENSE OF THE WORD... Take Care, Captain James T. Kirk |
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
what kind of uselessness is this? again when will you address the issues? your just writing out of nowhere with no direction. you dont know anything about my personal life and for you to tell me to screw a 1000 women is retarded. and i dont mean that figuratively, i mean it literally. are you some sort of savior to tell me the path to happiness that will lead me out of my prison? and by the way how did you get rockgazers ire? of all the people on this forum? i hope you brought your spelunking gear because your head is way up you ass. its guys like you that brought about the dark ages.
|
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
i could care less if he liked men john that is so not my point.
Watch out he's winding the watch of his wit, by and by it will strike. |
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
What cracker is this same that deafs our ears with this abundance of superfluous breath.
|
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
and john boy. tis better to remain silent and be thought a fool, then to open one's mouth and remove all doubt. you have successfully removed all doubt
|
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
john you have told me Shakespeare liked guys like 5 times now. tell me something i didn't already know.
Shakespeare wrote brilliantly, beautifully. he was able to make plain paper sing with every human emotion that exists. do you think anyone today would find pleasure in his writings if all he did was prattle on thinking he had some gleeful little secret he just had to constantly find new ways to brag about? "hi my name is will. i LIVE on a farm. i am a biSEXUAL male in EVERY sense of the word. i love SPLOOGE WEE i am SO unplugged". and i am not writing the old english you twit it's Shakespeare quotes, even today very readable to those of us with more on our minds than being overly excited about being bi. |
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
john you have told me Shakespeare liked guys like 5 times now. tell me something i didn't already know.
Shakespeare wrote brilliantly, beautifully. he was able to make plain paper sing with every human emotion that exists. do you think anyone today would find pleasure in his writings if all he did was prattle on thinking he had some gleeful little secret he just had to constantly find new ways to brag about? "hi my name is will. i LIVE on a farm. i am a biSEXUAL male in EVERY sense of the word. i love SPLOOGE WEE i am SO unplugged". and i am not writing the old english you twit it's Shakespeare quotes, even today very readable to those of us with more on our minds than being overly excited about being bi. |
|
Originally Posted by rockgazer69
smartypants.
|
|
Originally Posted by thatguy
This is what's going on with him:
He is gay. He has been shunned and hurt by various people because of it. This is why he hates religion so much. I'm not sure why, perhaps he was raised with a religious background, or perhaps it is because he is married with children, but for some reason he feels the need to justify his sexuality to himself and others CONSTANTLY. Because of his obsession to justify it to himself and others, he has allowed his sexuality to permeate every other area of his life. Now, no matter what the subject is, he somehow brings it back to his sexuality in one way or another. He sees everything through that "filter." He never admits to being wrong in any situation because somehow, maybe subconsciously, he feels that being wrong means that his being gay is wrong. This doesn't make logical sense, but it stems from his obsession with the subject and that fact that he has let it take over all of his thoughts. He lives on a farm because he enjoys nature - it doesn't condemn or discriminate, it just continues on around him whether or not he is gay. He loves the acceptance, and even uses "nature" often to further justify his sexual preferences. He finds joy in things - books, movies, etc. not necessarily because they are good, but because they make him feel better. He looks for people that will not condemn his sexuality, but will support it and will shun people who don't. Hence his interest in Dr. Alfred Kinsey and liberals like George Carlin. He would not be able to find joy in a book by someone more conservative; instead, he would see it as a threat to who he is. He preaches open-mindedness and acceptance of everything even though it is different, however it is apparent to all of us that true open-mindedness is accompanied by comfort -- comfort in other opinions and the people that hold them. If one is truly open-minded, then other opinions are not threats to them, even if they are different. To surround yourself with different opinions is to enrich yourself. Instead of being open-minded, he is very closed. He defends his opinions and stances ardently. He encourages others to be open-minded only so they will consider his own narrow opinions. One who is truly open does not defend because he sees the validity in all opinions. One who is truly open does not get offended as John often does, because other opinions are not threats but rather companions. In closing, I am confident that the analysis of his actions I have outlined above are accurate, but there is no way to prove them. He has built up such a shell around himself that he will never let me or anyone else make him admit this is true. But I know that I, and probably many others, can see these things. It is sad and interesting that he has let his supposed strength become his overwhelming weakness, and he has let his own obsession take all of the real joy and comfort away from the lifestyle that he has chosen. Maybe this post will be an eye-opener for him, and he will let some of these things go, so that he can be truly content in who he is and the choices he has made. |
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Hi Thatguy,
First of all - to repeat, I am a BiSexual Man. If I was Gay though I would have no problem with that natural aspect of Sexuality and Life either. The hurt and the shunning you speak of comes from "religious teachings" which are based on total falsehood. It is directed to me and to people who are also BiSexual and Homosexual based on "religious beliefs" which are totally inaccurate and wrong. God speaks for Himself and never needs anyone to speak for Him. God never said one word and neither did Jesus Christ. What men "create" or "dream-up" is just that. Nothing more. And that is what "religion" IS. I have no use for anyone or any "religion" that promotes hatred, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, tunnel-vision, etc. or those that have as their desire to cause others any misery or promote the strangling of life and living. You mention "...justification..." - I do not need to "justify" what is completely natural, right and good. And I do not. It is not necessary to "justify" something that is intended by Nature to be. And is. Heterosexuality, BiSexuality and Homosexuality - terms - names applied to - are facets of Sexuality that ARE completely natural and intended. I address the ignorance and in some cases the stupidity. You speak of "obsession" - it IS the "religious right" that is "obsessed" trying to "justify" their promotion of falsehood and outright lying. It is THEY who are trying to "survive" against the mounting scientific evidence that what they "preach" is total fabrication - because when that fabrication IS PROVEN BEYOND ANY DOUBT they will BE the fools they have always been in everyone's eye then. So they always will be against any honest accurate scientific research into any subject that questions the "teachings" of "religion". You speak of "...acceptance..." - it IS "religion" that DEMANDS others just "accept" what is postulized "or you are OUT" and that fear they generate into others is designed to damn people in an effort to gain some kind of strength OVER others and perpetuate the bullshit. "Religion" is nothing more that another form of politics and the controlling of others for some one else's personal gain. It is a power-trip. I always consider all things from all perspectives objectively and with a completely open mind. That is how I can say what I say. It is the sum of the evidence I gather from all points of view and the evidence itself. If you did the research yourself you would see the truthfulness of this yourself. You mention my "...getting offended...". I do not know of any human being that would not "get offended" by someone else who - in the name of some "religion" - would try to damn, discredit, harm, or even kill someone else especially if there were absolutely no truthful accurate honest basis for that or valid reason. "Religion" is nothing more than brainwashing. And the strange thing about that is that some people ALLOW themselves to be brainwashed. That willl never happen to me. You and some others who respond to what I say in the manner and fashion that you do, do that in response to my questioning of your "beliefs" because I have validity and facts to back up my words. And it scares you to have someone discredit honestly what you promote. Using your Heterosexuality for example. If someone questioned you and it you'd be one of the first to be "offended" and would want to "defend" yourself. You mention "condemning" - I look at THE FACTS and when I see others "condemn" when that "condemnation" is based on FALSEHOOD I certainly will stand up and say something. As for me "being wrong", when I am I honestly and freely admit it. No one is perfect. You could not be more wrong about me. But then you really do not know me at all. Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by John H.
Hi Thatguy,
First of all - to repeat, I am a BiSexual Man. If I was Gay though I would have no problem with that natural aspect of Sexuality and Life either. The hurt and the shunning you speak of comes from "religious teachings" which are based on total falsehood. It is directed to me and to people who are also BiSexual and Homosexual based on "religious beliefs" which are totally inaccurate and wrong. God speaks for Himself and never needs anyone to speak for Him. God never said one word and neither did Jesus Christ. What men "create" or "dream-up" is just that. Nothing more. And that is what "religion" IS. I have no use for anyone or any "religion" that promotes hatred, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, tunnel-vision, etc. or those that have as their desire to cause others any misery or promote the strangling of life and living. You mention "...justification..." - I do not need to "justify" what is completely natural, right and good. And I do not. It is not necessary to "justify" something that is intended by Nature to be. And is. Heterosexuality, BiSexuality and Homosexuality - terms - names applied to - are facets of Sexuality that ARE completely natural and intended. I address the ignorance and in some cases the stupidity. You speak of "obsession" - it IS the "religious right" that is "obsessed" trying to "justify" their promotion of falsehood and outright lying. It is THEY who are trying to "survive" against the mounting scientific evidence that what they "preach" is total fabrication - because when that fabrication IS PROVEN BEYOND ANY DOUBT they will BE the fools they have always been in everyone's eye then. So they always will be against any honest accurate scientific research into any subject that questions the "teachings" of "religion". You speak of "...acceptance..." - it IS "religion" that DEMANDS others just "accept" what is postulized "or you are OUT" and that fear they generate into others is designed to damn people in an effort to gain some kind of strength OVER others and perpetuate the bullshit. "Religion" is nothing more that another form of politics and the controlling of others for some one else's personal gain. It is a power-trip. I always consider all things from all perspectives objectively and with a completely open mind. That is how I can say what I say. It is the sum of the evidence I gather from all points of view and the evidence itself. If you did the research yourself you would see the truthfulness of this yourself. You mention my "...getting offended...". I do not know of any human being that would not "get offended" by someone else who - in the name of some "religion" - would try to damn, discredit, harm, or even kill someone else especially if there were absolutely no truthful accurate honest basis for that or valid reason. "Religion" is nothing more than brainwashing. And the strange thing about that is that some people ALLOW themselves to be brainwashed. That willl never happen to me. You and some others who respond to what I say in the manner and fashion that you do, do that in response to my questioning of your "beliefs" because I have validity and facts to back up my words. And it scares you to have someone discredit honestly what you promote. Using your Heterosexuality for example. If someone questioned you and it you'd be one of the first to be "offended" and would want to "defend" yourself. You mention "condemning" - I look at THE FACTS and when I see others "condemn" when that "condemnation" is based on FALSEHOOD I certainly will stand up and say something. As for me "being wrong", when I am I honestly and freely admit it. No one is perfect. You could not be more wrong about me. But then you really do not know me at all. Take Care, John H. |
|
Originally Posted by craig777
Wow John, your anger and hatred is overwhelming. How many times do you say religions and religious in all of that.
I am a Christian and I attend a 10,000 member church. I think I know how most Christians think. We believe that homosexuality is a sin, that is true. Do we condemn or judge you for it, not at all. Have at it and have fun. John, I think you need to look at yourself. I don't know why Christians have to see it your way. We are entitled to our beliefs just as you are entitled to yours. Bye |
|
Originally Posted by bio-chem
john boy i was unable to read further when i got to "God never said one word, and neither did Jesus Christ" you need to clarify what you mean by this. are you saying God doesnt have contact with us and he just leaves us to our own thoughts/feelings/emotions to control our actions? cuz if thats the case your one cynical bastard.
john boy your inability to admit your wrong is one of the many reasons people dont like your myriad of posts on the same stupid subject. you always post in some way to justify your lifestyle. the fact is we are not closed minded for not accepting your views. we can totally look at the situation objectively and decide that your lifestyle does not fit our beliefs. you need therapy bad john boy and about 2 handfulls of pills |
|
Originally Posted by thatguy
Well, once again you have done two things: 1) Proved my point even further and 2) Made more illogical statements. Let's start at the beginning...
Look at how many times you mentioned religion. It is clear that you see religion and the stance it takes as a threat to who you are. You claimed that you have no need to justify yourself. Yet you spend post after post doing it every time you log on. You claim that you have an open mind, yet you spent several paragraphs trying to debunk religion, and referred to those that believe in it as "fools." That doesn't sound very open to me, in fact, it is quite closed. I will restate my previous claim: You want others to be open-minded only so they will be open to your narrow views. You claim that I say the things I say to you because of my beliefs. I want you to search my posts and find a time I religiously condemned being gay or bisexual. I never did. I actually stated that I was confused by what the Bible says. Things I say to you are never to condemn your sexual preference; instead they are to show you three things: 1) that you are not open-minded as you claim to be, 2) that you do not use logic to prove your points, and 3) you scorn religious people for "imposing" their views on you, yet all here would agree that you impose your views on us. I have nothing against you or your sexuality personally, John, merely the way you go about shoving it down everyone else's throats. You claim that God and Jesus Christ has never said anything to anyone. How do people even know who Jesus is? Was Jesus a mime when he was on earth? Did a group of people follow this mime around and pretend he was speaking? This does not make logical sense. You ask for the use of evidence. My last post was a sum of the evidence I have seen in your posts. You discredit it as if it was written by someone of lesser intelligence than you. It seems to me that you have no respect for pure evidence, but rather you only respect evidence that proves YOUR point. Speaking of evidence, do you have any evidence that Jesus or God never spoke? You would probably say, "They've never spoken to me." But what about all of the millions of people that claim they've spoken to them? You will not consider their opinions because when it comes down to it, you are closed-minded. This is what it boils down to: For whatever reason you have decided to hold certain views on certain things. That is fine and acceptable. However, you hold them in concrete while wearing a false cloak of open-mindedness, when in reality you are closed to all opinions except the ones you have chosen to hold. I have already delineated my opinion on the reasons for this in my last post, so I won't do it again. I could be wrong, John, because I only know you by the few hundred posts of yours I've read. But based on those, I'd say that evidence leans in my favor, and I'm sure there are plenty of others who would agree... |