-->
Pages: 1

Ass to the ground deep squats


(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)




Posted by: CRASHMAN

ok, so, A little while back, my old power lifting coach told me its ok to do really deep squats. I just have a concern cause i'm doing ass to ankle squats with super heavy weight(350). Just wondering is this safe? i don't want to end up like me friend who had reconstructive surgery a 2 years ago and still not better (from snowboarding) I love my Squats!



Posted by: devildog88

Deep squats are way overrated! Anything past parrallel do more damage than good!



Posted by: Prince

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Deep squats are way overrated! Anything past parrallel do more damage than good!
please back this statement up with some factual data.



Posted by: vegman

What are the benifits of going lower than parallel?



Posted by: KarlW

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Deep squats are way overrated! Anything past parrallel do more damage than good!


Quote:
please back this statement up with some factual data.




Posted by: Prince

Quote:
Originally Posted by vegman
What are the benifits of going lower than parallel?
Full ROM, don't you strive for that in other lifts? You will incorporate more glutes and hams as well.

But even if there were no benefits lets see the science that shows going below parallel causes damage as he suggested.



Posted by: P-funk

a) I believe i talked about this in one of the newsletters.

b) squatting and snowbaording are tow ocmpletely differnet things. I mean, squatting for one is a stationary exercise. Snowbaording there is a lot of enrgy transfer, body movement and hip movement. One wuick turn and you can tear and acl or if you come of a jump really hard you can blow something out, the force of gravity can really put some pressure on your meniscus if you lock out and then twist even slightly. Snowbaording is much more dynamic.



Posted by: KarlW

As far as the knees are concerned, I think it's fair to say that snowboarding is risky, but I don't see what that has to do with squats.



Posted by: Rocco32

ATF squats are MUCH better than parrellel. I hurt (in a good way) in more places when I do full ROM rather than to parrellel. Plus when you go AFT, there is no doubt in your mind your going deep enough



Posted by: devildog88

Squating below parrallel puts the patella tendon in a bad position. It becomes bound by the patella itself. Squating is a natural position granted but not with twice, three times or even four times your body weight. It is truely hard on your knees. Football teams have quit full squats all together. Box squats, just above parrallel are just as benificial in most all applications.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Squating below parrallel puts the patella tendon in a bad position. It becomes bound by the patella itself. Squating is a natural position granted but not with twice, three times or even four times your body weight. It is truely hard on your knees. Football teams have quit full squats all together. Box squats, just above parrallel are just as benificial in most all applications.

box squats above parallel are beneficial because more often than not people are working on that lock out power.

you can't find one studt in a peer reveiwed journal that will back up what you said about the patella tendon. Quite the opposite actually. Most studies will say that squating below parallel can lead to a strengthening of the patella tendon through that ROM.



Posted by: vegman

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Squating below parrallel puts the patella tendon in a bad position. It becomes bound by the patella itself. Squating is a natural position granted but not with twice, three times or even four times your body weight. It is truely hard on your knees. Football teams have quit full squats all together. Box squats, just above parrallel are just as benificial in most all applications.
I agree.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rocco32
ATF squats are MUCH better than parrellel.
How are they much better?



Posted by: Rocco32

Quote:
Originally Posted by vegman
I agree.


How are they much better?
Have you not read the thread?



Posted by: vegman

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocco32
Have you not read the thread?
I'm not convinced.
It doesn't help that my knees "crack" if go below parrellel either.



Posted by: devildog88

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
box squats above parallel are beneficial because more often than not people are working on that lock out power.

you can't find one studt in a peer reveiwed journal that will back up what you said about the patella tendon. Quite the opposite actually. Most studies will say that squating below parallel can lead to a strengthening of the patella tendon through that ROM.
I disagree. I have seen to many young men end their career as football players trying to do deep squats. As a result, since I have become the head coach I won't allow my athletes to do low squats. Maybe I am just lucky but I haven't lost one player to a knee injury. By the way we played for the state championship last year and in the semifinals the year before.



Posted by: Deeznuts

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Deep squats are way overrated! Anything past parrallel do more damage than good!

I strongly disagree. My strength on squats went through the roof when I began training "ass to the floor". It burns my hams and glutes in a way I didn't think was possible.

As far as safety goes, wear a belt on real heavy weight to protect your back. And, if you're doing reps with weight you're unsure of make sure you have a spot. Heavy squats will take a tole on your body no matter what as time goes on. Below parallel squats may speed up this process, but it may not. If you're looking for the best way to build muslce and strength I say below parallel is the way to go (just my opinion). Maybe not for all your sets, but some at least. Vary things up a little and see what happens.

Good luck.



Posted by: KarlW

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
. I have seen to many young men end their career as football players trying to do deep squats.
Surely there's a lot of assumption in this statement. Are you saying they injured their knees WHILE deep squatting? If that is the case then I would agree it's a bad idea, but maybe they had bad form as well. Or are you saying they performed deep squats then injured their knees playing football?



Posted by: CRASHMAN

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk

b) squatting and snowbaording are tow ocmpletely differnet things. I mean, squatting for one is a stationary exercise. Snowbaording there is a lot of enrgy transfer, body movement and hip movement. One wuick turn and you can tear and acl or if you come of a jump really hard you can blow something out, the force of gravity can really put some pressure on your meniscus if you lock out and then twist even slightly. Snowbaording is much more dynamic.


I wasn't comparing the two. i was just saying i dont want to end up all gimpy like him not by doing the same thing



Posted by: Jay334

Acording to this page full squats place greater stress on the knees.



Posted by: P-funk

myth #1



Posted by: KarlW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay334
Acording to this page full squats place greater stress on the knees.
It doesn't really say that. It says, which is well known, that you shouldn't bounce off the bottom.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
It doesn't really say that. It says, which is well known, that you shouldn't bounce off the bottom.

lol, if anything it says this:

Quote:
Kreighbaum conclude the deep squat is of little danger to the knees unless these variables and factors are disregarded




Posted by: Deeznuts

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
Nice site P



Posted by: vegman

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
Thanks for the link, that's good stuff



Posted by: Jay334

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
It doesn't really say that. It says, which is well known, that you shouldn't bounce off the bottom.
Maybe you missed this part:
Quote:
Simply by not squatting down all the way (e.g. 90°) both the knees and hip do not experience as great of torque forces.




Posted by: KarlW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay334
Maybe you missed this part:
In context:

"It is not necessary to avoid the torque force if the muscles and joint structures can adapt.Certainly, if an individual has had a history of knee pain associated with these types of movements, the squat can be modified to to place more torque on the hip and consequently less on the knee joint. Based on the above analysis, this can be accomplished two ways. Simply by not squatting down all the way (e.g. 90°) both the knees and hip do not experience as great of torque forces."

Of course, if one experiences pain in any exercise one should stop and examine things.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
In context:

"It is not necessary to avoid the torque force if the muscles and joint structures can adapt.Certainly, if an individual has had a history of knee pain associated with these types of movements, the squat can be modified to to place more torque on the hip and consequently less on the knee joint. Based on the above analysis, this can be accomplished two ways. Simply by not squatting down all the way (e.g. 90°) both the knees and hip do not experience as great of torque forces."

Of course, if one experiences pain in any exercise one should stop and examine things.

exactly. It even says a HISTORY of knee pain. No one advocates full ROM squats for someone with an injury.



Posted by: Prince

Full (Deep) Squat

Kreighbaum (1996) illustrate the safe position of a deep squat with the knees extending beyond the toes. Kreighbaum explains how a deep squat can be performed little chance of injury to the knee. The variables of concern:

speed of descent
size of calves and thighs
strength of the controlling muscles

The primary danger to the knee occurs when the tissues of the calf and thigh press together altering the center of rotation back to the contact area creating a dislocation effect. The danger of knee injury in this situation may be prevented if either of the following factor are present:

Center of gravity of the body system is keep forward of the altered center of rotation
muscles of the thigh are strong enough to prevent the body from resting or bouncing on the calves.

Kreighbaum conclude the deep squat is of little danger to the knees unless these variables and factors are disregarded. Certainly only a limit type of athletes may have a sports specific need to perform a full squat. Olympic weightlifters commonly bounce out of a full front squat with near maximum resistances during both the Clean & Jerk and Snatch. Incidentally, the wide stance during an Olympic style squat further reduces knee torque forces.

http://www.exrx.net/ExInfo/Squats.html



Posted by: devildog88

Perhaps it was just that I work with mainly highschool age kids. In my earlier statement I said that I have seen too many careers end with deep squats. Let me clarify: I have had kids that end their time with an ACL or MCL injury. This is a pretty typical injury, but since I have been a head coach we have had none. Now, I will not let my kids do full squats because it is not a sport specific. Is this the reason that we haven't had any knee injuries?????????? probably not! But I am staying with what has worked for us to this point. Very rarely in football are you sitting on your haunches, if you are then you got your ass kicked. A deep squat may have a place in Body Building.........I will openly admit that I don't have the expertise to tell people not to do them.



Posted by: Jay334

I didnt say deep squat isn't safe, I said it puts more stress on the knees, i.e exposes the knees and hips to greater troque forces. That's what the article says too (and it's an article defending squats as safe). It says it's safe if your joints are healthy and you use proper form. But if your knees are not healthy or you want less risk of injury not going below 90º is a good idea. Personally, I think squats in general are tough on the knees so I'd rather keep that stress to a minimum.



Posted by: Dale Mabry

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Now, I will not let my kids do full squats because it is not a sport specific.

Well this is certainly true, but the overall adaptations found in a full ROM squat are definitely of benefit. All the stuff mentioned before re: strengthening of tendons/ligaments and such. I would more likely do deep squats in the preseason and then switch to box squat/partial ROM squat during the season.



Posted by: Prince

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay334
I didnt say deep squat isn't safe, I said it puts more stress on the knees, i.e exposes the knees and hips to greater troque forces. That's what the article says too (and it's an article defending squats as safe). It says it's safe if your joints are healthy and you use proper form. But if your knees are not healthy or you want less risk of injury not going below 90º is a good idea. Personally, I think squats in general are tough on the knees so I'd rather keep that stress to a minimum.
all weight training is stressful on your joints.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
Perhaps it was just that I work with mainly highschool age kids. In my earlier statement I said that I have seen too many careers end with deep squats. Let me clarify: I have had kids that end their time with an ACL or MCL injury. This is a pretty typical injury, but since I have been a head coach we have had none. Now, I will not let my kids do full squats because it is not a sport specific. Is this the reason that we haven't had any knee injuries?????????? probably not! But I am staying with what has worked for us to this point. Very rarely in football are you sitting on your haunches, if you are then you got your ass kicked. A deep squat may have a place in Body Building.........I will openly admit that I don't have the expertise to tell people not to do them.

I understand what you are saying about working with kids. I think squating to parallel is fine but I am just saying that squatting past it activates more muscles as there is an increase of torque around the joint. Also, it is not as dangerous as some believe.

the only other thing I ahve to say about the injuries you are referring to is that they will not occur during a squat unless proper form is not being observed. Why?? Because for a tear like you are reffering to to happen you would need something more than jsut the up and down motion that hapens in a squat. Also, jsut because you aren't going past parallel, if you are not using solid form, those same injuries can occur if you get any other motion than the up and down motino of the squat. The tears you are reffering to are more likely to happen on the filed then in the weight room.

for example:

1) ACL tear- the ACL prevents anteroir displacement of the tibia and runs in similiar fashion as the hamstring (anterior cruciate ligament). The way you would injure that would be if you hyper extended the knee or made a quick stop and pivot. Both things that happen on the field and not when squatting (with good form)

2) MCL- also providing stability to the knee joint (medial collateral ligament). In order to injure this muscle you would need some sort of external blow from the lateral side on the knee. think getting tackled, not squatting.

and for shits:

3) PCL- (posteroir cruciate ligament). this would be torn from a blow to the shins from a direct front hit making the shins go back behind the knee. thick chop block (no wonder it is banned)

4)mensicus- to tear this you woul dneed some sort of load and then rotation at the knee. this could happen when squatting, more commonly than the others. However, it matter not to what depth you squat to. You could be quarter squatting with to much weight and sloppy form and rotate accideently with that load.




not trying to be a jerk here. just helping people to understand these structures and their purposes.



Posted by: KarlW

typing fast huh?



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
typing fast huh?




why, did I mispell a lot of things? I was typing pretty fast, I guess.



Posted by: KarlW

Still, you'd have to be pretty bloody sloppy to sustain these injuries WHILE squatting, I think a back injury is more likely. My guess is the anti-deep squatters are more worried about the long term effects on the knees.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
Still, you'd have to be pretty bloody sloppy to sustain these injuries WHILE squatting, I think a back injury is more likely. My guess is the anti-deep squatters are more worried about the long term effects on the knees.

I thought that is what I was pointing out?? what are you trying to say? I am agreeing with you.



Posted by: KarlW

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
I thought that is what I was pointing out?? what are you trying to say? I am agreeing with you.
I'm trying to say that................................I'm tired and need to go to bed.



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
I'm trying to say that................................I'm tired and need to go to bed.

no, i am tired and need to go to bed. You too??



Posted by: PreMier

ATG here.



Posted by: jram

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlW
Still, you'd have to be pretty bloody sloppy to sustain these injuries WHILE squatting, I think a back injury is more likely. My guess is the anti-deep squatters are more worried about the long term effects on the knees.
I've posted my comments before on this subject. I'm 67 years young and w/o alone at home. My knees are not the greatest but I do my routines not to break any personal records but, just to try and stay in half way decent shape. I use wraps and squat (5X2's twice-total of 10 reps) ATG up to 200 lbs. Anything over 200 lbs., I do (5X2's twice) just below parallel. Presently, I am at 270. I do sets of two simply because it allows me to concentrate more on form and recovery. It seems at times I tend to lose strict form after 3+ reps and if I lose the form that's when I'm afraid I'll just hurt myself.

I'm a firm believer that strict form is the key to injury free squats and so far I've had no injuries as a result of using this method of squatting. Just my 9 cents.

Peace



Posted by: P-funk

wraps can be dangerous as the lock the patella down so hard into the socket causing a greater amount of sheer force at the knee.



Posted by: jram

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-funk
wraps can be dangerous as the lock the patella down so hard into the socket causing a greater amount of sheer force at the knee.
Good point PF but, my applied wraps are such that they are comfortable and as tight as not to prohibit an ATG squat with distress.

Peace



Posted by: Uzi9

I fucked my knee ligament up from squating to deep, wasnt heavy and form wasnt bad, also i didnt go any where near faliure..



Posted by: P-funk

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uzi9
I fucked my knee ligament up from squating to deep, wasnt heavy and form wasnt bad, also i didnt go any where near faliure..

did you twist coming out of the hole or something?? You the ligaments of your knee don't just "fuck up" unless you do something strange to them.



Posted by: Dale Mabry

CRASHMAN

Aren't you into MMA? If so, deep squatting is a must.



Posted by: CRASHMAN

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
CRASHMAN

Aren't you into MMA? If so, deep squatting is a must.

i've been doing them and people keep getting on my case that i'm going to blow my knees out. i keep telling them to shut up, but the bastards made me paranoid



Posted by: devildog88

Did Ass to the Ground Squats last night and man is my ass killing me!!! I had to back off on the weight a bit but it feels like it was worth it. Knees held up just fine!



Posted by: Flex

Quote:
Originally Posted by devildog88
I disagree. I have seen to many young men end their career as football players trying to do deep squats.
That's because they were idiots and squat with way too much weight than they can handle with proper form, just like 95% of all people in any given gym



Posted by: devildog88

Obviously the weight is the key here. If you back off and stay in control I think deep squats can work.




(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)





vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38