Quote:
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
I wish I knew how that rabbit did it.
He seems to catch me also.  |
| --> |
|
Originally Posted by Vieope
Remember when you ate everything and was happy and healthy?
|
|
Originally Posted by SPIKE1257
Well, at least happy..
|
|
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
Note to self...Whenever someone posts potential hazards of a substance and...
1)He is an organic nut and 2)Sites no credible source You can disregard anything he says. |
|
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
Note to self...Whenever someone posts potential hazards of a substance and...
1)He is an organic nut and 2)Sites no credible source You can disregard anything he says. |
|
Originally Posted by P-funk
I noticed that about Mercola also, He never sites any sources. What is up with that?? That guy is such an anal freak.
|
|
Originally Posted by Vieope
|
|
Originally Posted by P-funk
lmao....what the fuck?? Did you have that saved somewhere so that you could pull it out whenever you needed it? An ace up the sleeve if you will. How did you not only remeber that but search it out. You are a real freak!! LMAO. I am not as anal as Mercola though. that guy wins.
|
|
Originally Posted by P-funk
lmao....what the fuck?? Did you have that saved somewhere so that you could pull it out whenever you needed it? An ace up the sleeve if you will. How did you not only remeber that but search it out. You are a real freak!! LMAO.
|
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
I wish I knew how that rabbit did it.
He seems to catch me also. |
|
Originally Posted by BiggerNstronger
Eat splenda, eat the pink stuff or the blue stuff.....whatever is going to happen is going to happen.
|
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
I wonder if the blue bunny is pink on the inside?
|
|
Originally Posted by Vieope
I show you pink.
Wait a minute.. you just tricked me.. |
|
Originally Posted by SPIKE1257
|
|
Originally Posted by XcelKrush
If Emma eats splenda, Ill eat splenda.
|
|
Originally Posted by min0 lee
I've always been leery of splenda, just sounds too good to be true.
|
|
Originally Posted by Emma-Leigh
I made a personal choice to limit artificial sweeteners a long time ago. I particularly just try to stay away from the other sweeteners...
|
|
Originally Posted by SPIKE1257
|
|
Originally Posted by BigDyl
Steve tastes good.
|
And why are you coming out of the closet in my thread ? 
|
Originally Posted by BigDyl
Steve tastes good.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
That website sites one study from 1991. If it were a serious health issue and the study was considered sound, there would be hundreds of studies by now. There are not.
If a study is not published, there is a reason for it. If this were actually the case, most of the diet journals would be flooded with this information. On a side note, did you know that if you feed rats enough water, they will die? So now water is toxic. |
|
Originally Posted by Super Hulk
what brand do you use ? the kind i tried tastes like crap
|
|
Originally Posted by Super Hulk
yea to rats. will people die if they drink to much water ? no ? then animals arent a good test for us are they ? splenda is a CHEMICAL sweetener.
|
|
Overall Assessment of Toxicological Data Sucralose was poorly absorbed after oral administration in humans. The notified chemical was of very low acute oral toxicity in rats (LD50 > 16 000 mg/kg bw) and mice (LD50 > 10 000 mg/kg bw). The sucralose hydrolysis products, 4-CG and 1,6-DCF, when tested as an equimolar mixture were of low and very low acute oral toxicity in rats (LD50 = 1629 mg/kg bw) and mice (LD50 = 3499 mg/kg bw) respectively. Sucralose was non mutagenic in three Ames tests and non clastogenic in human lymphocytes and rat bone marrow cells. Sucralose was weakly mutagenic in a mouse lymphoma mutation assay. 4-CG was non mutagenic in an Ames test and a mouse lymphoma assay. 4-CG was non clastogenic as determined by a human lymphocyte assay and a rat bone marrow test. Although 1,6-DCF was found to be weakly mutagenic in 3/9 Ames tests and 2/5 mouse lymphoma assays, it was non clastogenic as determined by two rat bone marrow chromosomal aberration assay and a human lymphocyte test. 1,6-DCF did not induce sister chromatid exchanges or micronuclei in mouse bone marrow cells. A sex linked recessive lethal assay in Drosophilia melanogaster and a covalent DNA binding potential study in rats were negative. The sucralose hydrolysis products 4-CG and 1,6-DCF were not genotoxic as determined by a dominant lethal test in the mouse when tested as an equimolar mixture. There was no evidence of treatment related neoplasm in rats fed a diet containing up to 3% sucralose (equivalent to 3000 mg/kg bw/day) during the carcinogenicity phase of a combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study and during a 104 week carcinogenicity study. No evidence of treatment related neoplasia was detected in rats dosed with an equimolar mixture of the sucralose hydrolysis products, 4-CG and 1,6-DCF, at up to 2000 ppm in the diet for 104 weeks. Decreased bodyweight gain was observed in rats and mice fed diets containing 3% sucralose for 104 weeks. This effect was not observed in beagle dogs dosed with 3% sucralose (equivalent to 750 mg/kg bw/day) in the diet for 52 weeks. A minimal increase in the incidence of renal pelvic mineralisation and epithelial hyperplasia lesions were detected in rats, primarily females treated with 3% sucralose. A significant decrease in erythrocyte count was detected in female mice dosed with 3% sucralose. Decreased bodyweight gain and a small increase in the incidence of hepatocellular clear cell foci was observed in female rats treated dose with an equimolar mixture of 4-CG and 1,6-DCF at 2000 ppm in the diet for 104 weeks. A number of studies have been conducted examining the acceptability and palatability of sucralose as a cause of reduced bodyweight gain when administered in drinking water or diet. It was determined that reduced bodyweight resulted from reduced palatability of diets containing sucralose. The dietary NOEL for mice and rats was determined to be 30 000 ppm (equivalent to 1500 mg/kg bw/day). The dietary NOEL for the sucralose hydrolysis products was determined to be 600 ppm (equivalent to 30 mg/kg bw/day). The notified chemical was not teratogenic in rats and rabbits, was not neurotoxic in mice and monkeys, and had no effect on male and female reproduction in rats, or insulin secretion and carbohydrate metabolism in normal and diabetic human volunteers. Sucralose was found to induce a reduction in thymus weight in rats dosed orally with 3000 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for immunological endpoints was 750 mg/kg bw/day. The sucralose hydrolysis products, 4-CG and 1,6-DCF, when test as an equimolar mixture was not teratogenic, not neurotoxic, and had no effect on male and female reproduction. The notified chemical is not determined to be a hazardous substance according to the NOHSC Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances (NOHSC, 1999). |
|
Originally Posted by Super Hulk
that stuff is a lie.
|
|
Originally Posted by Super Hulk
that stuff is a lie.
|
|
within minutes of drinking soda with aspartame or sucralose i get a headache. Every time. |
| show me someone who consumes aspartame over a few years who has no health problems.i will bet money you cant do it. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.