|
Originally Posted by ChrisROCK
SLDLs, if done correctly are to target the hams...
|
|
Originally Posted by du510
http://www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/...gDeadlift.html
Erector spinae are synergests, though. IMO, you can get a good low back WO from these. Almost as good as GM's. |
|
Originally Posted by Rocco32
Most definately. I do SLDL for Hams AND back
|
|
Originally Posted by ChrisROCK
SLDLs, if done correctly are to target the hams...
|
|
Originally Posted by CowPimp
Eh, SLDLs if done correctly tear up your entire posterior chain. .
|
|
Originally Posted by P-funk
I still don't understand why people still insist on looking at exercises (especially something like a deadlift which encompasses so many things) as "back" or "legs" or "hamstrings". I just say look at it as a posterior chain exercise. Train movements not body parts.
just my opinion. |
|
Originally Posted by P-funk
I still don't understand why people still insist on looking at exercises (especially something like a deadlift which encompasses so many things) as "back" or "legs" or "hamstrings". I just say look at it as a posterior chain exercise. Train movements not body parts.
just my opinion. |
|
Originally Posted by Rocco32
It is a posterior chain exercise! Are you going to tell me now that squats are for quads?!?
|
|
Originally Posted by Sam40
Nope! squats are not just for quads, although that is one of the primary muscle worked. But stiff leg dead-lifts, are more of a posterior killer than anything else. Anyone with the slightest sign of back trouble, should not do them. In the beginning, it was never used as a full range exercise. You only lifted until your back was just above parallel to the floor, no higher. This minimizes the lower back involvement, and places the work where it is supposed to go (hams & glutes).
|
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.