|
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
I wonder how many AAS users concede that they have low self-esteem? That would be an interesting question. If it's not for hypogonadism, and not for competitive sport, then it must be for cosmetic reasons.
|
|
Originally Posted by Flex
Bodybuilding in general is typically for cosmetic reasons in the first place.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
I wonder how many AAS users concede that they have low self-esteem? That would be an interesting question. If it's not for hypogonadism, and not for competitive sport, then it must be for cosmetic reasons.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Your regular Joe Schmoe who simply lifts for a hobby and juices probably has low self esteem.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
If it's not for hypogonadism, and not for competitive sport, then it must be for cosmetic reasons.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mudge
Do you consider body dismorphia low self esteem? Yes, thats an honest question. I think it can go either way.
|
|
Originally Posted by gococksDJS
How did you arrive at this assumption? Im curious, have you talked to experienced steroid users or is this based solely on ignorance?
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Myself, and those who I've known to use, did it for athletic competition. So it was for performance, not cosmetics. If I wasn't competing in anything I wouldn't have used. Maybe in my mid 30s I'll go on HRT, but then it's only to bring me back to normal ranges if needed.
There are a number of balanced editorials about AAS use. Heck, I think Bill Lewellyn was the author of one of the articles who said that those who do it purely for cosmetics (and do not compete in anything) have low self esteem. Many others would agree. Lewellyn himself used AAS for 10 years purely for cosmetics, and I think deep down he admits he had low self esteem before. It's an interesting issue that requires self-reflection, which is good every now and them IMO. |
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Myself, and those who I've known to use, did it for athletic competition. So it was for performance, not cosmetics. If I wasn't competing in anything I wouldn't have used. Maybe in my mid 30s I'll go on HRT, but then it's only to bring me back to normal ranges if needed.
There are a number of balanced editorials about AAS use. Heck, I think Bill Lewellyn was the author of one of the articles who said that those who do it purely for cosmetics (and do not compete in anything) have low self esteem. Many others would agree. Lewellyn himself used AAS for 10 years purely for cosmetics, and I think deep down he admits he had low self esteem before. It's an interesting issue that requires self-reflection, which is good every now and them IMO. |
|
Originally Posted by gococksDJS
You still didn't answer my question. How did you arrive at the assumption that all of those who use steroids for reasons other than competitive have a low self esteem? You say that Bill Lewellyn admits to using purely for cosmetic reasons but then go on to say you think that deep down he admits to a low self esteem, meaning you just assume this? To me it sounds like although you claim you were using for competitive reasons, they did in fact boost your possibly low self-esteem yet you still have the "competitive" excuse to fall back on.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
I also do not believe that competitive BBers have low self esteem. It's their career and a way to put food on the table. Same with police officers. Taking the risk for your career (i.e. money) is different than taking the risk so that you can wake up in the morning and simply be happy with your appearance.
|
|
Originally Posted by Flex
You make it sound like pro BB'ers woke up one morning and were like "i wanna be a pro BB". Sorry, doesn't work like that.
I still do not see the correlation b/w AAS users and low self esteem. But, while you're at it, you mine as well generalize it to all people who lift weights for cosmetic purposes. AAS is merely another means to an end and quickens the process of getting bigger/leaner. Do some who life weights and/or juice have low self esteem? Sure. But no one can say the majority lifts and/or juices due to low self esteem. That's ridiculous. |
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Sounds like you're missing my point. Exercising and wanting to look and feel better in and of itself isn't evidence of low self esteem (although it is in a few cases). I'm referring to the taking of legal and medical risks (essentially going to extreme measures like drug usage) simply so that one can feel more satisfied with their appearance. Basically, it's the mentality of "it's worth the risks so that I can look better." That mentality also applies to plastic surgery patients who otherwise do not have any defect in their appearance. It is not an insult to say that someone has low self-esteem. But since most men are proud it's rare to find someone who admits it apparently.
I hope I've made it more clear on how the cosmetic motivation has a different basis than the money and professional accomplishment motivation. But it's only an opinion. |
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Your regular Joe Schmoe who simply lifts for a hobby and juices probably has low self esteem.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
Sounds like you're missing my point. Exercising and wanting to look and feel better in and of itself isn't evidence of low self esteem (although it is in a few cases). I'm referring to the taking of legal and medical risks (essentially going to extreme measures like drug usage) simply so that one can feel more satisfied with their appearance. Basically, it's the mentality of "it's worth the risks so that I can look better." That mentality also applies to plastic surgery patients who otherwise do not have any defect in their appearance.
|
|
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
I see no difference between taking steroids for sports or just to be bigger or look better. But what I have heard too many times are athletes trying to make themselves look and feel better by trying to distance themselves from recreational steroid users.
In all honesty I feel that an Athlete using steroids is easily the most insecure of the two. To cheat at sports, break the law and to take the health risks is a clear indication of someone who might have little or no confidence in their abilities. But to label either group is just foolish, everybody is different. |
|
Originally Posted by young d
thats a very narrow-minded statement, and if you are going to call that out on juicers, you may as well say everyone that diets, works out, lifts weights, and takes general pride in there appearance for personal reasons has low self esteem... i find that statement pretty ridiculous
|
|
Originally Posted by young d
sorry but that is bullshit
i do this because it gives me a buzz, the next man might get a kick out of driving a car 0-60 in 7 seconds, i get a buzz out of lifting big weight, the strength i get is useful for the sports i play, and it is also a social thing as you meet plenty of cool guys down the gym that share the same interests... how the hell can you compare all that pain, sweat, adrenalin and sense of achievement to someone getting cosmetic surgery? |
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
I'm talking about the taking of risks for social rewards and self-satisfaction. That is a self-esteem issue. Taking risks to make money is, at the very core, based on the desire for survival. You need money to eat and take care of those you love, and within that context, many find that the risks of AAS are worth the reward.
|
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
B
Your regular Joe Schmoe who simply lifts for a hobby and juices probably has low self esteem. |
|
Originally Posted by SubliminalX
I can see your point somewhat. But I disagree about your take on "the lack of confidence in one's athletic abilities." You've taken out the money aspect to make your argument, Taking steroids to play in the N.F.L is ok but to take them just to play college ball is pathetic, most people juice up way before money is an issue......but if you were a division one starter and juiced up your Senior year in hopes to turn prow then ok that is probably a good idea which was what my argument was based on. I would completely agree with you if it was recreational sport without financial implications.
It's the risk vs. reward that is the issue, not the desire for self-improvement. Bottom line is, recreational juicer = social reward. Athlete or professional juicer = financial reward. But yeah, everyone is different like you said. And I maybe I didn't make it clear in my first post that I wasn't trying to make a blanket label. But I still stand by my argument that you're more likely to find self-esteem issues among the recreational juicers than you are among people who do it for their careers. How many would admit it, or realize it, is really my original inquiry. |