IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forums


IronMagLabs - Bodybuilding Supplements
Pages: 1

Nuclear explosion video

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)




Posted by: god hand

http://thatvideosite.com/view/1471.html






Posted by: SuperFlex

Man those girls aren't from Indianapolis...



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
Damn that shit is sweet. I wish all chemistry was nothing but crazy destruction like that.



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by SuperFlex
Man those girls aren't from Indianapolis...
haha, they're from Columbia



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Damn that shit is sweet. I wish all chemistry was nothing but crazy destruction like that.
Bet you wont say that if(when) the US gets hit.

Its quite obvious how the worlds gonna end. That was just a preview.



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
Weak! It's not even strong enough to knock over the guy holding the camera...


Sweet clip no doubt...



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
Bet you wont say that if(when) the US gets hit.

Its quite obvious how the worlds gonna end. That was just a preview.
In a few decades, nuclear energy will be nothing more than an energy source. There will be much more destructive weapons that make nuclear weapons seem like cap guns.



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
In a few decades, nuclear energy will be nothing more than an energy source. There will be much more destructive weapons that make nuclear weapons seem like cap guns.
WTF?



Posted by: The Monkey Man

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
Nuclear explosion video
Yeah...

That pretty much sucks



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
WTF?
I bet they already have a few...



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
WTF?
When dynamite was invented, it was considered a powerful explosive. When nitroglycerin was synthesized it was also, and so was ammonium nitrate, but now, these can be assembled by any junior chemist in a matter of minutes. The atomic bomb Little Boy was 14 kilotons when it was dropped on Hiroshima, but the Tsar Bomb was 50 megatons, making it over 3500 times more powerful than Little Boy. It's only a matter of time before we find a source that emits more thermonuclear energy than plutonium.



Posted by: BigDyl

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
When dynamite was invented, it was considered a powerful explosive. When nitroglycerin was synthesized it was also, and so was ammonium nitrate, but now, these can be assembled by any junior chemist in a matter of minutes. The atomic bomb Little Boy was 14 kilotons when it was dropped on Hiroshima, but the Tsar Bomb was 50 megatons, making it over 3500 times more powerful than Little Boy. It's only a matter of time before we find a source that emits more thermonuclear energy than plutonium.
Like when matter collides with anti-matter.


Just think how normal the Anti-Foreman would be.



Posted by: DOMS

Quote Originally Posted by BigDyl
Like when matter collides with anti-matter.
Plutonium releases about 10% of it's matter to energy (if memory serves), while matter/anit-matter releases 100% of its energy.



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
When dynamite was invented, it was considered a powerful explosive. When nitroglycerin was synthesized it was also, and so was ammonium nitrate, but now, these can be assembled by any junior chemist in a matter of minutes. The atomic bomb Little Boy was 14 kilotons when it was dropped on Hiroshima, but the Tsar Bomb was 50 megatons, making it over 3500 times more powerful than Little Boy. It's only a matter of time before we find a source that emits more thermonuclear energy than plutonium.
The Tsar Bomb was a H-bomb not a plutonium bomb tho? I throught they stop using plutonium then started using uranium, and now is fusing the hydrogen atom which is the lightest atom of them all? Right?

I throught you were this site science guy! This is 2005 not 1944!







Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
The Tsar Bomb was a H-bomb not a plutonium bomb tho? I throught they stop using plutonium then started using uranium, and now is fusing the hydrogen atom which is the lightest atom of them all? Right?

I throught you were this site science guy! This is 2005 not 1944!



Well god hand, let science guy break it down for your feeble little mind. Hydrogen, plutonium, uranium and suckmydickium are all elements used to create atomic chain reactions, making them nuclear bombs. The kiloton system is a means of measuring an atomic bombs power, and 1 kiloton=1000 tons of TNT. A hydrogen bomb is a type of nuclear fusion where a small atomic bomb ignites the fusion process while nuclear weapons using uranium and plutonium work off of the prinicple of nuclar fission. I'm not sure what you're asking in that last part, but plutonium and uranium or used for fission and hydrogen for fusion.



Posted by: BigDyl

Anti Matter bombs will yield yottaton explosions.


True Story.



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Well god hand, let science guy break it down for your feeble little mind. Hydrogen, plutonium, uranium and suckmydickium are all elements used to create atomic chain reactions, making them nuclear bombs. The kiloton system is a means of measuring an atomic bombs power, and 1 kiloton=1000 tons of TNT. A hydrogen bomb is a type of nuclear fusion where a small atomic bomb ignites the fusion process while nuclear weapons using uranium and plutonium work off of the prinicple of nuclar fission. I'm not sure what you're asking in that last part, but plutonium and uranium or used for fission and hydrogen for fusion.
I'm saying there cant be a more powerful bomb than the H-bomb. Because hydrogen is the lightest and most explosive atom. (Warning! I am not sure if I know what the hell I'm saying is true, so it might not make since)



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by DOMS
Plutonium releases about 10% of it's matter to energy (if memory serves), while matter/anit-matter releases 100% of its energy.
Supposedly matter/anti-matter collisions do release 100% of their energy, but it's impossible for that to be the case in every collision because there would be no matter, or anti-matter for that fact, at all if 100% was lost as energy with each collision. There has to be some collisions where not all the matter is destroyed and after billions and billions of years, the left over matter would build up into everything in existence today.



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
I'm saying there cant be a more powerful bomb than the H-bomb. Because hydrogen is the lightest and most explosive atom. (Warning! I am not sure if I know what the hell I'm saying is true, so it might not make since)
Well, im not sure, but hydrogen is used because it is positively charged and because it's so light, not because it's light weight releases the most energy. See what i'm saying? One mole of hydrogen has a mass of only 1.008 grams while one mole of another cation like sodium has a mass of 22.99 grams. This is good because the ignition of fusion has to take place at very very high temperatures, in the millions of degrees I think, and this has to take place in a very confined space so that the ignition energy isn't lost. E=mc^2 shows that the more mass you have, the more energy you need to increase the temperature, so it would take less energy to heat 50 moles of hydrogen to the fusion temperature than 50 moles of sodium. Once the fusion temperature is reached, two positively charged hydrogen nuclei fuse together and form a helium nucleus. The mass of the helium nucleus that forms is less than the two hydrogen, and the difference is released as energy, and that's thermonuclear energy.



Posted by: bio-chem

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Well, im not sure, but hydrogen is used because it is positively charged and because it's so light, not because it's light weight releases the most energy. See what i'm saying? One mole of hydrogen has a mass of only 1.008 grams while one mole of another cation like sodium has a mass of 22.99 grams. This is good because the ignition of fusion has to take place at very very high temperatures, in the millions of degrees I think, and this has to take place in a very confined space so that the ignition energy isn't lost. E=mc^2 shows that the more mass you have, the more energy you need to increase the temperature, so it would take less energy to heat 50 moles of hydrogen to the fusion temperature than 50 moles of sodium. Once the fusion temperature is reached, two positively charged hydrogen nuclei fuse together and form a helium nucleus. The mass of the helium nucleus that forms is less than the two hydrogen, and the difference is released as energy, and that's thermonuclear energy.
the reason hydrogen is used is because it can sustain a chain reaction not because it can be positively charged. duterium or tritium is what is used to make the thermonuclear warhead (more specifically lithium6, because it decays into duterium or tritium). the reason this is important is because you need the extra neutrons in the nucleus to sustain the reaction. without the lithium the bomb would be too big. (the first thermonuclear weapon detonated used liquid hydrogen and was the size of a large house). everything else gococks wrote is spot on from what i can remember from what i studied of this. The book the making of the atomic bomb by richard rhodes explains this subject in great detail and can be understood even if one is not a nuclear physics guru



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem
the reason hydrogen is used is because it can sustain a chain reaction not because it can be positively charged. duterium or tritium is what is used to make the thermonuclear warhead (more specifically lithium6, because it decays into duterium or tritium). the reason this is important is because you need the extra neutrons in the nucleus to sustain the reaction. without the lithium the bomb would be too big. (the first thermonuclear weapon detonated used liquid hydrogen and was the size of a large house). everything else gococks wrote is spot on from what i can remember from what i studied of this. The book the making of the atomic bomb by richard rhodes explains this subject in great detail and can be understood even if one is not a nuclear physics guru
I see what you are saying about hydrogen sustaining the chain reaction, but I think the fact that hydrogen is a cation with a +1 charge is one of the main reasons why it works so well. The two positively charged atoms will repel each other, unless you expose them to extremely high temperatures, so their nuclear strong force can overcome their charge repulsion and force them to fuse together. The formula of Coulombs Barrier of fusion is U=ke^2/r, e is the proton charge, k is Coulombs constant and r is the radius when nuclear attractive forces become stronger than the electron repulsion, meaning as charge increased, so would the required temperature. But i'm not sure if this is correct.



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
nuclar
nuclear... How do you ever expect to shed those gills if you can't spell "nuclear" correctly?



Posted by: SuperFlex

The SuperFlex bomb... It's going to work on a whole new level of genius. Of course I will be the lead scientist... This is how it works... I've concocted a new means for the superior bomb. It doesn't feed on any internal fuel source but rather external. It still feeds off hydrogen but that which is airborn. The revolutionary thinking that's been put into my smart bomb is unparrelled. Albert Einstein , what a jackass...

It literally ignites the hydrogen in the air. The current prototype is the size of a pen and packs enough explosive power, do to the remarkable engineering, to blow up the world 6,423 times over! We plan to test it this Friday just off the coast of California. Hopefully it works. Everybody say their prayers...



Posted by: BigDyl

You idiots don't realize the power of the Flux Capacitor.



Posted by: MyK

Quote Originally Posted by SuperFlex
Man those girls aren't from Indianapolis...



I hope you kidding, dumbass!



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by BigDyl
You idiots don't realize the power of the Flux Capacitor.
Marty McFly does, and that's all that matters, because he and Doc have gay time travel sex, where do you think the "wormhole" came from? It's vast, it's a tunnel through time, it can only be McFly's sphincter, or as the scientific community likes to call it, McSphincter. What are you looking at butthead?



Posted by: Dale Mabry

Quote Originally Posted by SuperFlex
The SuperFlex bomb... It's going to work on a whole new level of genius. Of course I will be the lead scientist... This is how it works... I've concocted a new means for the superior bomb. It doesn't feed on any internal fuel source but rather external. It still feeds off hydrogen but that which is airborn. The revolutionary thinking that's been put into my smart bomb is unparrelled. Albert Einstein , what a jackass...

It literally ignites the hydrogen in the air. The current prototype is the size of a pen and packs enough explosive power, do to the remarkable engineering, to blow up the world 6,423 times over! We plan to test it this Friday just off the coast of California. Hopefully it works. Everybody say their prayers...
Oh, I figured it just brow-beat you until you convert to Christianity.



Posted by: PreMier

Amazing..



Posted by: maniclion

You know I'm a mushroom cloud laying motherfucker, especially on chili day.



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Well, im not sure, but hydrogen is used because it is positively charged and because it's so light, not because it's light weight releases the most energy. See what i'm saying? One mole of hydrogen has a mass of only 1.008 grams while one mole of another cation like sodium has a mass of 22.99 grams. This is good because the ignition of fusion has to take place at very very high temperatures, in the millions of degrees I think, and this has to take place in a very confined space so that the ignition energy isn't lost. E=mc^2 shows that the more mass you have, the more energy you need to increase the temperature, so it would take less energy to heat 50 moles of hydrogen to the fusion temperature than 50 moles of sodium. Once the fusion temperature is reached, two positively charged hydrogen nuclei fuse together and form a helium nucleus. The mass of the helium nucleus that forms is less than the two hydrogen, and the difference is released as energy, and that's thermonuclear energy.
From what I remember, the H-bomb has an atomic bomb inside of it. Why? Because when the Atomic bomb goes off, the incrediable amounts of heat energy released sets off a chain reaction you know where I'm going.



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by MyK


I hope you kidding, dumbass!
Of course I was kidding dipsiznit. And I mean that in the gayest of ways...



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
Oh, I figured it just brow-beat you until you convert to Christianity.
Testing has been put off until July 4th. Bush contacted me and what's to do the testing in Iran...



Posted by: MyK

Quote Originally Posted by SuperFlex
Of course I was kidding dipsiznit. And I mean that in the gayest of ways...




Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
From what I remember, the H-bomb has an atomic bomb inside of it. Why? Because when the Atomic bomb goes off, the incrediable amounts of heat energy released sets off a chain reaction you know where I'm going.
You're correct. There is an atomic device inside hydrogen bombs, which is used to generate enough heat to begin the fusion reaction. So the fission reaction initiates the fusion reaction.



Posted by: god hand

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
You're correct. There is an atomic device inside hydrogen bombs, which is used to generate enough heat to begin the fusion reaction. So the fission reaction initiates the fusion reaction.




Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by god hand
Einstein actually never had a thing to do with inventing the nuclear bomb. His equation E=mc^2 only proved that breaking atomic bonds would yield massive amounts of energy. He volunteered to help with the Manhattan Project after writing a letter to Roosevelt about the Germans being capable of harnessing nuclear energy, but Roosevelt deemed him a security threat. They were afraid he would pass secrets to other scientists in Germany who would then "sell" them to the Nazi's so he had absolutely nothing to do with it.



Posted by: god hand




Okay I'm just havin fun now



Posted by: BigDyl

Quote Originally Posted by god hand



Okay I'm just havin fun now
String theory is outdated. Replaced and accepted by MOST by brane theory, or membrane theory.



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by BigDyl
String theory is outdated. Replaced and accepted by MOST by brane theory, or membrane theory.
Brane theory is just a more advanced String theory, or M Theory, which basically says strings, that previously existed in 10 dimensions, are the intersection of Manifolds (M) in eleven dimension space, which correspond with M-Branes in 4 dimensional space. But Brane theory is already beginning to evolve, the newest is D-Brane Theory



Posted by: BigDyl

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Brane theory is just a more advanced String theory, or M Theory, which basically says strings, that previously existed in 10 dimensions, are the intersection of Manifolds (M) in eleven dimension space, which correspond with M-Branes in 4 dimensional space. But Brane theory is already beginning to evolve, the newest is D-Brane Theory

GoCock's mom gives good "brane" theory, or GCMGG-Brane Theory. That's a pretty popular one too.



Posted by: bio-chem

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
I see what you are saying about hydrogen sustaining the chain reaction, but I think the fact that hydrogen is a cation with a +1 charge is one of the main reasons why it works so well. The two positively charged atoms will repel each other, unless you expose them to extremely high temperatures, so their nuclear strong force can overcome their charge repulsion and force them to fuse together. The formula of Coulombs Barrier of fusion is U=ke^2/r, e is the proton charge, k is Coulombs constant and r is the radius when nuclear attractive forces become stronger than the electron repulsion, meaning as charge increased, so would the required temperature. But i'm not sure if this is correct.

charge never comes into play in a nuclear reaction. heat is a huge factor in this reaction, but so is pressure. many atoms can have a positive charge and a cation, but only with hydrogens isotopes under the correct circumstances do you get a h-bomb. its the same reason u-235 or pu-239 are used in a fission bomb. they give off nutrons to sustain the reaction. plenty of other atomic isotopes are radioactive, but that does not mean they can support a reaction.

these are the steps involved in a thermonuclear weapon.


The fission bomb imploded, giving off X-rays.
These X-rays heated the interior of the bomb and the tamper; the shield prevented premature detonation of the fuel.
The heat caused the tamper to expand and burn away, exerting pressure inward against the lithium deuterate.
The lithium deuterate was squeezed by about 30-fold.
The compression shock waves initiated fission in the plutonium rod.
The fissioning rod gave off radiation, heat and neutrons.
The neutrons went into the lithium deuterate, combined with the lithium and made tritium.
The combination of high temperature and pressure were sufficient for tritium-deuterium and deuterium-deuterium fusion reactions to occur, producing more heat, radiation and neutrons.
The neutrons from the fusion reactions induced fission in the uranium-238 pieces from the tamper and shield.
Fission of the tamper and shield pieces produced even more radiation and heat.
The bomb exploded.



Posted by: SuperFlex

Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem
charge never comes into play in a nuclear reaction. heat is a huge factor in this reaction, but so is pressure. many atoms can have a positive charge and a cation, but only with hydrogens isotopes under the correct circumstances do you get a h-bomb. its the same reason u-235 or pu-239 are used in a fission bomb. they give off nutrons to sustain the reaction. plenty of other atomic isotopes are radioactive, but that does not mean they can support a reaction.

these are the steps involved in a thermonuclear weapon.


The fission bomb imploded, giving off X-rays.
These X-rays heated the interior of the bomb and the tamper; the shield prevented premature detonation of the fuel.
The heat caused the tamper to expand and burn away, exerting pressure inward against the lithium deuterate.
The lithium deuterate was squeezed by about 30-fold.
The compression shock waves initiated fission in the plutonium rod.
The fissioning rod gave off radiation, heat and neutrons.
The neutrons went into the lithium deuterate, combined with the lithium and made tritium.
The combination of high temperature and pressure were sufficient for tritium-deuterium and deuterium-deuterium fusion reactions to occur, producing more heat, radiation and neutrons.
The neutrons from the fusion reactions induced fission in the uranium-238 pieces from the tamper and shield.
Fission of the tamper and shield pieces produced even more radiation and heat.
The bomb exploded.
That's similar to what I was going to say but with less detail...



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem
charge never comes into play in a nuclear reaction. heat is a huge factor in this reaction, but so is pressure. many atoms can have a positive charge and a cation, but only with hydrogens isotopes under the correct circumstances do you get a h-bomb. its the same reason u-235 or pu-239 are used in a fission bomb. they give off nutrons to sustain the reaction. plenty of other atomic isotopes are radioactive, but that does not mean they can support a reaction.

these are the steps involved in a thermonuclear weapon.


The fission bomb imploded, giving off X-rays.
These X-rays heated the interior of the bomb and the tamper; the shield prevented premature detonation of the fuel.
The heat caused the tamper to expand and burn away, exerting pressure inward against the lithium deuterate.
The lithium deuterate was squeezed by about 30-fold.
The compression shock waves initiated fission in the plutonium rod.
The fissioning rod gave off radiation, heat and neutrons.
The neutrons went into the lithium deuterate, combined with the lithium and made tritium.
The combination of high temperature and pressure were sufficient for tritium-deuterium and deuterium-deuterium fusion reactions to occur, producing more heat, radiation and neutrons.
The neutrons from the fusion reactions induced fission in the uranium-238 pieces from the tamper and shield.
Fission of the tamper and shield pieces produced even more radiation and heat.
The bomb exploded.
Charge is a very big factor in nuclear fusion, which is what a hydrogen bomb is. There is a substantial energy barrier opposing nuclear fusion, and there are two basic forces that together make nuclear reactions as powerful as they are, which are electrostatic force and strong nuclear force.


Hydrogen is beneficial because it has the smallest nuclear charge so it reacts at the lowest temperature. Helium's mass per nucleon is very low, which is why it's favored as a fusion product from an energy standpoint. That's why hydrogen bombs combine hydrogen isotopes to form helium isotopes. The entire fusion reaction is completely dependent upon the fact that the two hydrogen nuclei are repelling each other due to the fact that they are like charges, both being +1. The extreme heat is needed to accelerate the rate of the reaction, because the hydrogen nuclei need to be pushed together close enough to the point where strong nuclear force overcomes electrostatic repulsion. When strong nuclear force takes over, they will fuse, forming a helium isotope and releasing energy, and the destructiveness of the bomb is dependent upon this reaction occuring again and again in a very quick period of time. It's basic nuclear physics.



Posted by: BigDyl

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Charge is a very big factor in nuclear fusion, which is what a hydrogen bomb is. There is a substantial energy barrier opposing nuclear fusion, and there are two basic forces that together make nuclear reactions as powerful as they are, which are electrostatic force and strong nuclear force.


Hydrogen is beneficial because it has the smallest nuclear charge so it reacts at the lowest temperature. Helium's mass per nucleon is very low, which is why it's favored as a fusion product from an energy standpoint. That's why hydrogen bombs combine hydrogen isotopes to form helium isotopes. The entire fusion reaction is completely dependent upon the fact that the two hydrogen nuclei are repelling each other due to the fact that they are like charges, both being +1. The extreme heat is needed to accelerate the rate of the reaction, because the hydrogen nuclei need to be pushed together close enough to the point where strong nuclear force overcomes electrostatic repulsion. When strong nuclear force takes over, they will fuse, forming a helium isotope and releasing energy, and the destructiveness of the bomb is dependent upon this reaction occuring again and again in a very quick period of time. It's basic nuclear physics.


Very good, my student. You have learned much in my introduction to atomic particles and stuff 101 course.



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by BigDyl
Very good, my student. You have learned much in my introduction to atomic particles and stuff 101 course.
nucleowned?



Posted by: BigDyl

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
nucleowned?

Neutrinowned.



Posted by: myCATpowerlifts

Who was the artist of the song on that vid?
Megadeath ?



Posted by: bio-chem

Quote Originally Posted by gococksDJS
Charge is a very big factor in nuclear fusion, which is what a hydrogen bomb is. There is a substantial energy barrier opposing nuclear fusion, and there are two basic forces that together make nuclear reactions as powerful as they are, which are electrostatic force and strong nuclear force.


Hydrogen is beneficial because it has the smallest nuclear charge so it reacts at the lowest temperature. Helium's mass per nucleon is very low, which is why it's favored as a fusion product from an energy standpoint. That's why hydrogen bombs combine hydrogen isotopes to form helium isotopes. The entire fusion reaction is completely dependent upon the fact that the two hydrogen nuclei are repelling each other due to the fact that they are like charges, both being +1. The extreme heat is needed to accelerate the rate of the reaction, because the hydrogen nuclei need to be pushed together close enough to the point where strong nuclear force overcomes electrostatic repulsion. When strong nuclear force takes over, they will fuse, forming a helium isotope and releasing energy, and the destructiveness of the bomb is dependent upon this reaction occuring again and again in a very quick period of time. It's basic nuclear physics.
strong and weak nuclear forces are acting upon atoms regardless of wheather they are charged particles or not. they deal with the forces present in an atom at the nucleus. for instance in the nucleus of a helium atom you have two protons or two positively charged particles which should repel each other. the fact they are held together is because of strong and weak nuclear forces. nothing in the literature ive read indicates the electron must be stripped off of the hydrogen atom before a thermonuclear reaction will occur. the energy released is due to the fact that you have a loss of mass in a fission or fusion reaction. the duterium or tritium are not charged particles.



Posted by: gococksDJS

Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem
strong and weak nuclear forces are acting upon atoms regardless of wheather they are charged particles or not. they deal with the forces present in an atom at the nucleus. for instance in the nucleus of a helium atom you have two protons or two positively charged particles which should repel each other. the fact they are held together is because of strong and weak nuclear forces. nothing in the literature ive read indicates the electron must be stripped off of the hydrogen atom before a thermonuclear reaction will occur. the energy released is due to the fact that you have a loss of mass in a fission or fusion reaction. the duterium or tritium are not charged particles.
Do you think i'm talking about ionic charge when I say +1? I think you might be, because I referred to hydrogen as a cation in an earlier post, which I shouldn't have because we're talking about the nucleus, not the electron cloud surrounding the nucleus. I think the confusion comes from me referring to it as an ion, because the ionic charge of hydrogen is +1 but the formal charge of the nucleus is +1 because it only has one proton. What I meant earlier was that the nucleus of hydrogen has a formal charge of +1, which is what causes the electrostatic repulsion between the two atoms, and because the charge is +1, it's Coulomb barrier is the smallest of any other element. Electrostatic force increases as the number of protons increase, so the +1 on a hydrogen atom means that it's easier to break the electrostatic force between two hydrogen atoms than any other element on the periodic table. So it requires the least amount of energy for the strong nuclear force to overcome the electrostatic force meaning it requires the least amount of heat, compared to the other elements, to initiate fusion. Hopefully this clears things up.



(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Nuclear explosion video


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34