Originally Posted by Andy_Massaro

What is the difference?

is it just that when doing a bent row, your body is kept closer to parallel to the ground?

Originally Posted by PWGriffin

gotta love the chalked up hands when handling such ferocious weights...

Originally Posted by PWGriffin

gotta love the chalked up hands when handling such ferocious weights...

Originally Posted by Ironandsteel

I can't see on being more superior then the other in my humble opinion. I would suggest alternating them week to week. Reason being, you're chaning angles and hand postion. Ultimately hitting the target muscles slightly different and adds a little change to the routine. Change is good. Keep your routine fresh. Alternate weekly or bi weekly for example. You will get good muscle growth from both or either one if you choose only one. you can't go wrong with either form of bentover row.

Originally Posted by Triple Threat

Is she using the curling rack for rows?

Originally Posted by Gordo

Originally Posted by Triple Threat

Is she using the curling rack for rows?

Originally Posted by PWGriffin

gotta love the chalked up hands when handling such ferocious weights...

Originally Posted by Mudge

I'd train with her.

Originally Posted by Mudge

That is a joke right, the 'curling' rack?

Originally Posted by Mudge

Bent knees and all, looks good. That is right about how I like to do them, not kissing the floor bending your back like a jackinape.

Originally Posted by Gordo

Originally Posted by juggernaut

is this a chick?

Originally Posted by CowPimp

What's wrong with bending over more? I like to bend over pretty far, otherwise you are just reducing the resistance.

Originally Posted by FatCatMC

Agreed. I like to go a little lower than the chick in the picture.

Originally Posted by juggernaut

yeah but the yates seems as if its better on the back. Correct?

Originally Posted by juggernaut

well i would imagine hitting the muscles would best be suited for regular rows, and for the yates-safety.