Pages: 1

How much can you Military Press?

(CLICK HERE here to view the original thread with full colors/images)






Posted by: mike456

Military Press is a standing overhead press with a barbell, no half reps, I am talking about all the way down to your upper chest and all the way up.
It doesn't have to be 1rm either, mines sucks, but I just wanted to get an idea of what most people can press, my max is 85lbsx7

oh just wanted to add no using your legs to get the bar up lol



Posted by: kenwood

yeah, i'm in the same boat as u lol. my military press sucks ass. its 95lbs for 8reps



Posted by: mike456

Im surprised your bench is so much higher than your military press, thats weird, I only bench about 135 right now, I havent benched in about 3 months, but I tested my max about a week ago (I been doing push-ups')

lol thats funny, you bench 181 more pounds than you military press, and I only bench 31 more pounds than I bench (I used a calculator to test my/your max military (your max military= 119, your max bench is 300, right? My max military is 104, and my max becnh is 135) that is pretty weird. I must have an extremely weak chest, and you must have extremely weak front/side delts.



Posted by: kenwood

yeah ican only do lateal raises w/ freakin 5lb db's lmao. i can actually do 135lb military press once or twice lol but its freakin weak! i try everything to improve it but nothin at all. my freakin ez bar curls are better than that lmao



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
yeah ican only do lateal raises w/ freakin 5lb db's lmao. i can actually do 135lb military press once or twice lol but its freakin weak! i try everything to improve it but nothin at all. my freakin ez bar curls are better than that lmao
I think you should prioritze overhead presses, it might be holding you back from makin your bench explode, the front delt plays a big role in benching so I would work on strengthening them if I were you, dont do your military presses with a wide grip, do them so that when your pressing the elbows are in front of you, this makes the lift use more of the front delt and upper chest, and less lateral delt (lateral delt is not important for benching, but the front delt is)
also see how much weight you can do on this lift, if your weak on this lift it could also be another way to get your bench up alot, go test it out. go test it come back, and tell me how much you got on it



Posted by: kenwood

dude i can tell you right now that i can only do 5lbs for a couple reps and maybe 10lbs once lol . my incline bench is 240lbs last time i maxed on it



Posted by: PWGriffin

Kenwood doesn't bench 300lbs and he can't military press 135.



I don't military press in my workouts, I push press....so a little leg action, but it is all the down and up...I've done 160 for 5x5...I really feel like I could've done more but I was already up on that lift 15lbs so I didn't push it.



Posted by: kenwood

maybe my rear delt is weak too. whenever i go high on bench 260-270lbs i get a paininmy rear delts sometimes. my triceps are strong so that isnt a weakpoint really.



Posted by: fUnc17

the most i ever did was 165x8



Posted by: mike456

here read this article ( http://www.t-nation.com/findArticle.do?article=52balan ) you are supposed to be able to use 9% of the weight as you use on a close grip bench (14 inch between your hands), to have your bench at its max capacity, there was a hockey player that had a 240lbCG bench, but was weak as shit on that exercise, the trainer that wrote this article had him just train that exercise, with no benching at all, when he started he could only do 8lbs for 8 reps, after a couple of weeks he was doing around 30lbsx8 reps, guess what happened his CG bench went up about 50lbs. go read the article, and start training that movement, and prioritize Overhead Presses in your routine, and your looking at a way bigger bench, I was able to do way more than 9% of my CG Bench on that movement, and my overhead press is already proportionate to my bench, I think I just have a very weak chest, but I really dont care about that stuff right now, I have way bigger problems (posture problems, and the fact that I cant do a squat).
GL



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by fUnc17 View Post
the most i ever did was 165x8
WOW, good job



Posted by: kenwood

when you bench, where do you put your hands on the bar? my hands are usually 10" away from each other, even when i max out :S



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
when you bench, where do you put your hands on the bar? my hands are usually 10" away from each other, even when i max out :S
10" is more of a close grip...you need to remeasure dawg..



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
10" is more of a close grip...you need to remeasure dawg..
true



Posted by: mike456

thats why your overhead press is so weak, Closer the grip the less delts and the more tris



Posted by: kenwood

well thats what my grip is :\



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
well thats what my grip is :\
yes if you have strong tris/weakdelts, it is better to use a Closer grip ofcourse, because youll lift alot more weight that way



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
yes if you have strong tris/weakdelts, it is better to use a Closer grip ofcourse, because youll lift alot more weight that way
hmmm prolly...i've switched from bench to db presses and incline presses with db's. for some change . i've gotten stronger on incline and flat db presses



Posted by: kenwood

my seated military db presses (if thats correct). my best was 50lbs for 6reps :\



Posted by: TJ Cline

I military about 2x what kenwood says he can do...
And about 3x what he can do in reality.



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
if a particular athlete's personal best on the close-grip bench press is 225, but he has to ask the bag boy at the local Piggly-Wiggly to heft the one-gallon jugs of milk into his trunk, something is terribly, terribly wrong.
lol..from the article



Posted by: kenwood

ok i will start doing them in my workout. which workout tho? push or pull?. is this the reason i also suck at arm wrestling? lol



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
ok i will start doing them in my workout. which workout tho? push or pull?. is this the reason i also suck at arm wrestling? lol
your still doing that crappy push-pull shyt



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
your still doing that crappy push-pull shyt
lol fullbody push/pull . why is it crappy?



Posted by: CowPimp

Take the speed of light in meters per second, divide that by the population of Calcutta, India, multiply that by the percentage of US households without more than one television, multiply once more by the amount of wood a woodchuck can chuck in pounds per hour, and then add the number of democrats in the house of representatives.

That's how much I can military press for 3 repetitions.



Posted by: Spud

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp View Post
Take the speed of light in meters per second, divide that by the population of Calcutta, India, multiply that by the percentage of US households without more than one television, multiply once more by the amount of wood a woodchuck can chuck in pounds per hour, and then add the number of democrats in the house of representatives.

That's how much I can military press for 3 repetitions.
e^pi lbs eh?



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
lol fullbody push/pull . why is it crappy?
havent you learned yet that higher frequency programs (upper/lower twice a week, or TBW 2-3xs a week) are more superior.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp View Post
Take the speed of light in meters per second, divide that by the population of Calcutta, India, multiply that by the percentage of US households without more than one television, multiply once more by the amount of wood a woodchuck can chuck in pounds per hour, and then add the number of democrats in the house of representatives.

That's how much I can military press for 3 repetitions.




Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
havent you learned yet that higher frequency programs (upper/lower twice a week, or TBW 2-3xs a week) are more superior.
well its a fullbody workout 2x's a week



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
well its a fullbody workout 2x's a week
you just proved your a retard



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
you just proved your a retard
lol i mean each bodypart is worked 2x's aweek. so its more frequent



Posted by: kenwood

now your gonna call me a retard for still training bodyparts huh? . well i dont train bp i was just using that as an example. i just fucking confused myself



Posted by: mike456

do you know what higher frequency means?



Posted by: kenwood

yes...for example: like instead of training chest one time aweek you train it 2-3x's aweek.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
yes...for example: like instead of training chest one time aweek you train it 2-3x's aweek.


first you said "lol fullbody push/pull . why is it crappy?"
than you said "well its a fullbody workout 2x's a week"

so that means you are training 2xs a week? or do you just have a hard time expressing your self?



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post


first you said "lol fullbody push/pull . why is it crappy?"
than you said "well its a fullbody workout 2x's a week"

so that means you are training 2xs a week? or do you just have a hard time expressing your self?
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!


lol i just get confused and just type shit lol. i mean here

mon: fb push
tues. fb pull
wed- off
thurs- mondays
fri- tuesdays-sat&sun- off





Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!


lol i just get confused and just type shit lol. i mean here

mon: fb push
tues. fb pull
wed- off
thurs- mondays
fri- tuesdays-sat&sun- off

School will help you with that



Posted by: camarosuper6

Seated Military Press 265 for 8 solid reps.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by camarosuper6 View Post
Seated Military Press 265 for 8 solid reps.
WOW, hard work payed off



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by camarosuper6 View Post
Seated Military Press 265 for 8 solid reps.
holy shit! . do you have any pics? not of you doing it just body pics, etc.



Posted by: AKIRA

He said SEATED. Seated I did around 225lbs. Then months later I did Standing...got it up to 185lbs.

Different story when you stand and press.



Posted by: mike456

I find it easier to press when standing, I guess because that is how I train the movement the most... I very, very rarely do seated overhead presses.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwood View Post
holy shit! . do you have any pics? not of you doing it just body pics, etc.
try his gallery



Posted by: kenwood

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
try his gallery
lol just did.



Posted by: TJ Cline

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKIRA View Post
He said SEATED. Seated I did around 225lbs. Then months later I did Standing...got it up to 185lbs.

Different story when you stand and press.
I agree 100%, at my best I could press 275x10 seated but when I did it standing I could only train with 225 for the same reps....Standing military is way harder.



Posted by: mike456

the only reason it could be harder is because you have to use your stabilizers(mostly your core) more, therefore making it a better lift to do, maybe why I find seated harder is because when I did them I do them on a bench that has no back, just a regular bench.



Posted by: CowPimp

I tried a barbell seated military press when I was 14, one time. Never again. I think it feels terribly akward. You can't move out of the way for a natural bar path properly. I don't mind doing seated overhead pressing with dumbbells though.



Posted by: fUnc17

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp View Post
I tried a barbell seated military press when I was 14, one time. Never again. I think it feels terribly akward. You can't move out of the way for a natural bar path properly. I don't mind doing seated overhead pressing with dumbbells though.
I dont like the idea of compressing your spine against the bar and seat. one slip and you can really fuck yourself up



Posted by: PWGriffin

The aparatus for seated presses at my gym has a slight lean back....feels pretty natural. I do standing now however....no need for a spotter and I like push pressing.



Posted by: mike456

standing is better, you don't put pressure on your spine, and it requires core stabilization.



Posted by: AKIRA

I thought any overhead press will put load on the spine.



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
standing is better, you don't put pressure on your spine, and it requires core stabilization.
You can potentially put a ton of pressure on ur spine (lock ur knees)...And you don't think you put pressure on ur spine everytime u put a barbell on ur back or deadlift?? You are thinking too much in terms of absolutes.

Better is relative to the person's goals. Not everyone cares about core stabilization when they think of military pressing. Some people just want bigger, stronger delts...then get their core work in somewhere else.

Although I'm sure it's happened...I've never heard of anyone hurting their back doing seated military presses. My friend (chiro) did tell me however, that sitting down is the worst position for a person's back and it's actually not natural lol.



Posted by: ReproMan

Standing - 160x5



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatCatMC View Post
Standing - 160x5
niiice, niiice



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
You can potentially put a ton of pressure on ur spine (lock ur knees)...And you don't think you put pressure on ur spine everytime u put a barbell on ur back or deadlift?? You are thinking too much in terms of absolutes.
No you do not put nearly as much pressure on your spine when squatting or deadlifting than doing seated military presses with heavyweights, when your standing you have your legs to support you, when your seated... your screwed
Better is relative to the person's goals. Not everyone cares about core stabilization when they think of military pressing. Some people just want bigger, stronger delts...then get their core work in somewhere else.
well those people are stupid, they might as well use machines for every exercise, and than get there shoulder/knee/core stabilization work in somewere else
Although I'm sure it's happened...I've never heard of anyone hurting their back doing seated military presses. My friend (chiro) did tell me however, that sitting down is the worst position for a person's back and it's actually not natural lol.
whats your point? what is the advantage of doing it seated? and whats the disadvantages of doing it standing




Posted by: ReproMan

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
niiice, niiice
Thanks!



Posted by: AKIRA

..Taught him everything he knows. (Still at work, its 11pm!!!)



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
Quote:
No you do not put nearly as much pressure on your spine when squatting or deadlifting than doing seated military presses with heavyweights, when your standing you have your legs to support you, when your seated... your screwed
?? Are you serious?? When you say things like that, you better be able to back it up with facts. The FACT is that more people hurt their backs when squatting or deadlifting. Don't misunderstand...say ur military pressing/squatting/deadlifting 100 lbs..that doesn't mean in each scenario that 100lbs of pressure is being placed on ur spine. I want to say that depending on form and angle of pull and other compressive forces (intra-abdominal pressure)...pressure on the spine increases or sometimes multiplies...(e.g. rounding the back) You also typically USE a lot more weight when squatting and deadlifting...

When your standing ur legs support you and when ur seated ....the seat supports you lol.

Quote:
well those people are stupid, they might as well use machines for every exercise, and than get there shoulder/knee/core stabilization work in somewere else
That's a stupid statement. You are speaking in absolutes again. So I'm an idiot when I do seated dumbell OH presses on monday?? I do use a chair every so often for a couple exercises and I ASSURE you my core is plenty strong (I've held planks with 125lbs on my back)]

Quote:
whats your point? what is the advantage of doing it seated? and whats the disadvantages of doing it standing
I'm not saying there IS an advantage. But ur not a fuck up if you want to sit down and focus on the actual OH press.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
?? Are you serious?? When you say things like that, you better be able to back it up with facts. The FACT is that more people hurt their backs when squatting or deadlifting. Don't misunderstand...say ur military pressing/squatting/deadlifting 100 lbs..that doesn't mean in each scenario that 100lbs of pressure is being placed on ur spine. I want to say that depending on form and angle of pull and other compressive forces (intra-abdominal pressure)...pressure on the spine increases or sometimes multiplies...(e.g. rounding the back) You also typically USE a lot more weight when squatting and deadlifting...

More People hurt there backs when squatting or deadlifting because of bad form, not because of pressure being put on there spine. What the hell does that have to do with the fact that doing a seated press puts pressure on your back, I am sorry, but you are making no point

When your standing ur legs support you and when ur seated ....the seat supports you lol.

That is a stupid statement. How the hell is the seat supporting your spine!?!? say you are doing a seated press with 200lbs, you have 200lbs over you and nothing under your butt, except a freakin seat- how the hell is a seat going to take pressure of your spine?!? If your standing up you have your legs under you to take some of the pressure of your spine!

That's a stupid statement. You are speaking in absolutes again. So I'm an idiot when I do seated dumbell OH presses on monday?? I do use a chair every so often for a couple exercises and I ASSURE you my core is plenty strong (I've held planks with 125lbs on my back)

I made a good fucking point, you said they do a seated overhead press, and do core work elsewere, if there gonna do that they might as well use machines for every exercise and work on there stabilizers elsewere. The machine doesnt have any advantages on freeweights, but freeweights do have advantges on the machine, just as the seated press has no advantages on the standing press, but the standing press has advantages on the seated. Get it! I dont give a shit how much you can do a plank with on your back, if you did standing military press, your core would be stronger, and you will have a healthier spine

I'm not saying there IS an advantage. But ur not a fuck up if you want to sit down and focus on the actual OH press.

If there is no fucking advantage than why the hell would you do it! Just as there is no advantage to machines, thats why most smart people dont use them! Especially when there are good advantages to standing press, and good advantages to freeweights!
Do you get it now!



Posted by: TJ Cline

My Brain Just Exploded



Posted by: mike456

here you don't believe me? how about mr. p-funk:

http://ironmagazineforums.com/showpo...98&postcount=2



Posted by: viet_jon

lol.,,...so did mine.



Posted by: mike456

how about Cow Pimp?

http://ironmagazineforums.com/showpo...5&postcount=12



Posted by: mike456

how about yourself?
http://ironmagazineforums.com/showpo...12&postcount=5



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKIRA View Post
I thought any overhead press will put load on the spine.
yea but standing puts alot less pressure than seated



Posted by: PWGriffin

Hey mike, Cowpimp also said this...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp View Post
I don't mind doing seated overhead pressing with dumbbells though.


And p funk trains for olympic weightlifting....so why the hell would he do seated military press?? I don't think he bench presses either. What's ur point??



And yes, I push press too, big fucking deal, I like the exercise...I also like seated OH presses too.

THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT IS LOTS OF EXERCISES HAVE THEIR PLACE.

In your never ending quest for internet knowledge you have lost an OPEN MIND and have NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE. Can you even squat yet?? STFU. Didn't you fuckin fall down doin Standing military presses once?? How the fuck is that safe?? LMAO.



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
Hey mike, Cowpimp also said this...





And p funk trains for olympic weightlifting....so why the hell would he do seated military press?? I don't think he bench presses either. What's ur point??



And yes, I push press too, big fucking deal, I like the exercise...I also like seated OH presses too.

THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT IS LOTS OF EXERCISES HAVE THEIR PLACE.

In your never ending quest for internet knowledge you have lost an OPEN MIND and have NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE. Can you even squat yet?? STFU. Didn't you fuckin fall down doin Standing military presses once?? How the fuck is that safe?? LMAO.
you are such douche, you are backed up in the corner and had nothing else to say to back up your point, so you start makin fun of me, LMAO

P-funk said clearly it puts less pressure on your spine.

No I can't squat and I fell over because I had very bad core stability, I can now do Military Presses (that happened when I first started training), after that I didnt do any core work, just compounds and know I can do them with no balance problems.

There is no fucking reason to do seated military press unless you have a very weak core like I did and would fall over if you did them standing! you are a jack ass, and I lost all respect for you. Standing Military Press works your core stability more, and puts less pressure on your spine, end ofstory jackass.



Posted by: Tough Old Man

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
Military Press is a standing overhead press with a barbell, no half reps, I am talking about all the way down to your upper chest and all the way up.
It doesn't have to be 1rm either, mines sucks, but I just wanted to get an idea of what most people can press, my max is 85lbsx7

oh just wanted to add no using your legs to get the bar up lol
The last time i check was the last time a dude pissed me off in a bar...Works for me



Posted by: mike456

P-funk- "standing....feels more natural and puts less pressure on the spine then when seated."
say something now douche bag.



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
you are such douche, you are backed up in the corner and had nothing else to say to back up your point, so you start makin fun of me, LMAO

P-funk said clearly it puts less pressure on your spine.

No I can't squat and I fell over because I had very bad core stability, I can now do Military Presses (that happened when I first started training), after that I didnt do any core work, just compounds and know I can do them with no balance problems.

There is no fucking reason to do seated military press unless you have a very weak core like I did and would fall over if you did them standing! you are a jack ass, and I lost all respect for you. Standing Military Press works your core stability more, and puts less pressure on your spine, end ofstory jackass.

not EVERYONE has the same goals as you mike!! The only point I was EVER trying to make is that seated presses aren't bad and they serve a purpose as well!!



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
not EVERYONE has the same goals as you mike!! The only point I was EVER trying to make is that seated presses aren't bad and they serve a purpose as well!!
yes they are bad, they are bad for your spine, what purpose do they serve?



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
standing is better, you don't put pressure on your spine, and it requires core stabilization.
This was your original statement...that you don't put pressure on your spine. The fact is that you do. If someone (like you) has a weak core or a harder time balancing with weights overhead...or someone is more concerned with strength and size and less concerned with core stability (most bodybuilders) and wants to move more weight and feel the brunt of the exercise on their shoulders they might do a seated press!! It's not that difficult to understand!!



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
yes they are bad, they are bad for your spine, what purpose do they serve?
Oh god shut up with that shit...Do you squat?? Deadlift maybe??



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
This was your original statement...that you don't put pressure on your spine. The fact is that you do. If someone (like you) has a weak core or a harder time balancing with weights overhead...or someone is more concerned with strength and size and less concerned with core stability (most bodybuilders) and wants to move more weight and feel the brunt of the exercise on their shoulders they might do a seated press!! It's not that difficult to understand!!
I'll say this one last time.
Seated Press puts more pressure on the spine, and takes out core stabilization. And has no advantages. It is never a good idea to do seated press, even if the person had an incredibly weak core (like me), and would fall over, I would have them do incline presses, because SEATED PRESS PUTS TOO MUCH PRESSURE ON THE SPINE and there is no advantage of seated press. Even if someone is just concerned with strength and size, and could care less about core stabilization (wich would be stupid), there is still no reason to do seated press over standing press, but there is a reason to do standing over seated (A HEALTHIER SPINE!)



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
Oh god shut up with that shit...Do you squat?? Deadlift maybe??
Yes I do BW squats, but I am still working on my form on both, so I dont get injured, such as a dumbass like you would.



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
I'll say this one last time.
Seated Press puts more pressure on the spine, and takes out core stabilization. And has no advantages. It is never a good idea to do seated press, even if the person had an incredibly weak core (like me), and would fall over, I would have them do incline presses, because SEATED PRESS PUTS TOO MUCH PRESSURE ON THE SPINE and there is no advantage of seated press. Even if someone is just concerned with strength and size, and could care less about core stabilization (wich would be stupid), there is still no reason to do seated press over standing press, but there is a reason to do standing over seated (A HEALTHIER SPINE!)
Sigh, there is no talking to you....you are hardheaded and stubborn...everything is right or wrong...good or bad. I will just have to learn to live with my inferior philosophy that lots of different exercises have their place...I hope that my spine will continue to flourish under such harsh circumstances as 3 sets of seated OH presses a week....



Posted by: assassin

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules View Post
My Brain Just Exploded
mine blew up too



Posted by: assassin

my military press is so weak... maybe one of the reasons that i do them right after benching..but i still think i have a big problem with my shoulders ... my best was 135 for 5-6 reps ..... any suggestions to increase my military ??? shall i work overheads and military before benching instead after and alternate?



Posted by: Valias

100x8.



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by assassin View Post
my military press is so weak... maybe one of the reasons that i do them right after benching..but i still think i have a big problem with my shoulders ... my best was 135 for 5-6 reps ..... any suggestions to increase my military ??? shall i work overheads and military before benching instead after and alternate?
That's not bad. MP is hard. Are you not seeing any improvements right now?? Or is it just slow?



Posted by: assassin

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
That's not bad. MP is hard. Are you not seeing any improvements right now?? Or is it just slow?
when i was able to do 115 x 10 for seated military i was able to bench press more than 210 x 10reps ....that not ordinary...i'm sure my shoulders are weak and they don't improve.



Posted by: CowPimp

Mike, I really doubt that a seated military press puts more compressive force on your spine than a deadlift. The moment arm from your lower back to the weight is much larger (When lifting loads, this appears to be the most important factor in terms of compressive force on the spine), and the loads you are dealing with are far greater. You also have to consider anterior and posterior shearing forces on the vertebrae, which can vary a lot depending on the vector from the load to your spine and the posture you use while moving the weight.

Also, there are reasons to do the overhead press seated. Some of the top benchers out there use a seated military press lockout for a maximal effort lift to help their lockout on the bench press.



Posted by: viet_jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by assassin View Post
my military press is so weak... maybe one of the reasons that i do them right after benching..but i still think i have a big problem with my shoulders ... my best was 135 for 5-6 reps ..... any suggestions to increase my military ??? shall i work overheads and military before benching instead after and alternate?
same here.

I'm at 100x5 OH press, while my dead is 2xBW and squat 1.6xBW squat.


MY shoulders suk ass.



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowPimp View Post
Mike, I really doubt that a seated military press puts more compressive force on your spine than a deadlift. The moment arm from your lower back to the weight is much larger (When lifting loads, this appears to be the most important factor in terms of compressive force on the spine), and the loads you are dealing with are far greater. You also have to consider anterior and posterior shearing forces on the vertebrae, which can vary a lot depending on the vector from the load to your spine and the posture you use while moving the weight.

Also, there are reasons to do the overhead press seated. Some of the top benchers out there use a seated military press lockout for a maximal effort lift to help their lockout on the bench press.
Where were you 3 pages ago!?!?

Quote:
when i was able to do 115 x 10 for seated military i was able to bench press more than 210 x 10reps ....that not ordinary...i'm sure my shoulders are weak and they don't improve.
There are lots of factors to consider. When I started my new program about a little over 3 months ago my push press was UBER weak, and I get to use my legs a little even...I was also benching over 225...my last big push press was 160x5 and I'm benching about a hundred pounds more still. (1rm)

Do you periodize?? I do, and I also prioritize vertical movements on my 2nd upper body day too, I think that may help a little too.



Posted by: AKIRA

I dont understand mike's hard on for this. I understood what PW was responding to and hes already quoted what you said mike. It seemed (at the time) you were talking in absolutes and that standing pressesd ont put ANY load on the spine, he was responding to that...as did I.

I can lift more weight when I sit, therefore I would sit to increase strength in my deltoids/triceps. Does it put load on my spine? Well, lets just say, since I decided to sit, I dont really care for those kind of worries.

Not that this has anything to do with my injury, but when it did occur, when I was doing any shoulder dominant movements back then, I was always standing. When I was lifting sitting down, I never had any back worries. Again, thats not what happened to my back though.

I think mike is referring to seated OH presses as being risky such as upright rows are risky. I dont agree.



Posted by: mike456

yea akira, your right I think it is a risky movement, such as Behind the neck presses, or behind the neck pull-downs, I don't understand why anyone would take that risk if you dont benefit from it.

The whole argument was started when I said, standing is better than seated presses, I should have said: IMO standing presses are better, and I would never do seated.



Posted by: AKIRA

Yeah, you shouldve but you DIDNT!



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKIRA View Post
Yeah, you shouldve but you DIDNT!
lol



Posted by: PWGriffin

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike456 View Post
lol
am I still a douche that merits no respect??



Posted by: mike456

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWGriffin View Post
am I still a douche that merits no respect??
no, I still love you



Posted by: BigDyl

315 x 25



Posted by: The Monkey Man





Posted by: assassin

Quote:
Originally Posted by viet_jon View Post
same here.

I'm at 100x5 OH press, while my dead is 2xBW and squat 1.6xBW squat.


MY shoulders suk ass.
I'LL try prioritizing my shoulder lifts and do some rotator cuff and stuff work ,and see how it goes..



Posted by: StanUk

Im military pressing 105lbs for 8 reps. Which is good for me, as my bench sucks pretty hard at around 165lbs for 8 reps.



Posted by: DbLPLatinum89

i normally overhead press seated (1rm was 235) but standing the most ive done is 175x10.



Posted by: viet_jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by assassin View Post
I'LL try prioritizing my shoulder lifts and do some rotator cuff and stuff work ,and see how it goes..
I just tried OH pressing as my first movement today. Got up 105x8 easily. Also hit 125x3.


Since my shoulders are lagging, I'll be using that movement first for push days now.



Posted by: RockSolid

145 X 4-6








bodybuilding diet | bodybuilding workouts | bodybuilding supplements | muscle building | burn body fat | build muscle




vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36