|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by nicsta05
Hi everyone I just had a general question to ask?
My friend who has been pretty cleen all his life (no big drugs and not too much alcohol) did one m1t cycle followed by a sustanon 250 cycle last summer all with post cycle and everything. He then did a cut cycle starting in december and last week was diagnosed with advanced leukemia!! I was wondering if steroids could of helped accelerate the development of cancer or if it was just his time. Thanx |
|
Originally Posted by musclepump
There has never been a single conclusive study that steroids cause, or accelerate, cancer growth.
HGH on the other hand, has. |
|
Originally Posted by NordicNacho
Its proven that estrogen can increase breat cancer in women
|
|
Originally Posted by kicka19
i think its foolish to not believe steroids will drasticaly increase cancers growth, if you believe it has no effect your just telling yourself what you want to hear
|
|
Originally Posted by musclepump
I've seen numerous scientific studies that say otherwise.
But, I guess they're just telling me what I want to hear, too, right? |
|
Originally Posted by kicka19
yes u r hearing exactly what u want, give a person who has cancer steroids and the steroids will make it grow faster, im not saying it causes cancer but sure as hell doesnt help it. post ur numerous scientific studies
|
|
Originally Posted by kicka19
i think its foolish to not believe steroids will drasticaly increase cancers growth, if you believe it has no effect your just telling yourself what you want to hear
|
|
Originally Posted by brogers
You do realize they prescribe steroids such as prednisone to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, right?
|
|
Originally Posted by blueboy75
prednisone is not an anabolic steriod, it is an systemic immune-suppresive corticosteriod.
it is also commonly used for extreme cases of psoriasis type skin conditions. Interestingly, corticosteroids applied topically such as clobetasol can actually exaccerbate skin conditions such as fungal infections. I think your argument is weak. |
|
Originally Posted by musclepump
When you can't prove your point, try and pass the buck
|
|
Originally Posted by brogers
Just as the poster I quoted, I did not distinguish between "steroids." The point of my post was to show that steroids are a huge class of drugs with many different kinds that have vastly different actions. Generalizing all "steroids" is foolish.
It isn't an argument, so I'm not sure what's weak about it. It's a statement about medical treatments. I think your reading comprehension is weak. |
|
Originally Posted by kicka19
this is an ANABOLIC steroid forum, when steroids are brought up we assume they are anabolic and not for another purpose
|
|
Originally Posted by brogers
Just as the poster I quoted, I did not distinguish between "steroids." The point of my post was to show that steroids are a huge class of drugs with many different kinds that have vastly different actions. Generalizing all "steroids" is foolish.
It isn't an argument, so I'm not sure what's weak about it. It's a statement about medical treatments. I think your reading comprehension is weak. |
|
Originally Posted by blueboy75
The original post in this thread quoted 2 specific anabolics. And as others have already mentioned, this is an anabolic forum.
Using an example of corticosteriod in not relevant to any of the discussions/points here. I think my reading comprehension is fine, sufficient enough to comprehend irrelevant posts. |
|
Originally Posted by brogers
Actually it is relevant, the point is that it is not a good idea to make broad generalizations.
I suppose we can nail down that all anabolic steroids are totally alike. I'll keep this in mind as I start my cycle of 500mg halotestin/wk for 10wks. |
|
Originally Posted by brogers
Actually it is relevant, the point is that it is not a good idea to make broad generalizations.
I suppose we can nail down that all anabolic steroids are totally alike. I'll keep this in mind as I start my cycle of 500mg halotestin/wk for 10wks. |