Originally Posted by Malley

You would have Ben over a Peyton or Brady?

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

I saw this show called "Sports Science" on one of those nerd channels and they wanted to see who threw a ball faster: An NFL quarterback or an MLB pitcher. They had Rothlissberger for the QB (can't remember who the pitcher was). Turns out Big Ben actually generates more arm speed and power than the pitcher, but given the dynamics of a football, the football travels slower than a baseball.

Pretty interesting stuff.

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

Wouldn't that be relative to the resistance of the ball and weight of the ball, that a QB needs to generate more force to move it.

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

I like tacos.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Who says us musicians aren't thinkers! S. alexander huh? interesting? Yeah, he would look good in black and gold!

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Don't be a hater? Ben won the super bowl faster than those guys! He doesn't have to throw the rock 40 times a game to get the job done. Although, he may have to now, due to the running game. They always make good moves, and this shouldn't be any different.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Don't be a hater? Ben won the super bowl faster than those guys!

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer won Super Bowls, too.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Damn! I guess the score board doesn't matter. But, oh well. To each his own, the woman said, as she kissed the cow.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

If your only going by scoreboard there are 3 undefeated teams this year left. and ben isn't quarterbacking any of them.

sure the scoreboard matters, in a team sport. But this is about ben at the moment. and at the moment he is not the reigning super bowl champion. If I were building a team right now around a quarterback Ben would be down the list.


As far as kissing cows go. If you have some animal fetish please keep it to the sexual health forum.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Originally Posted by bio-chem

thank you.

any update on the pics for the most beautiful woman ill ever see?

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Apples and handgrenades!

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

You're implying he's this awesome quarterback because he won a Super Bowl and my point is that even below average quarterbacks can win a Super Bowl.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

I in no way ever said Ben was the best QB! This was a Steeler thread, not a Ben thread. But, there it is again, being gregarious!

Originally Posted by IronAddict

That 70's team was the best ever! Big Ben is argueably the best QB, if I was coach he would def. b my QB! How U win has a lot to do with why U win....

Originally Posted by Bradicallyman

I think the Steelers are a good team, especially their defense. And I think Ben is a good QB.

Here is my top ten in order

1.Brady
2.Favre
3.P Manning
4. Rivers
5. Romo
6. Brees
7. Cutler
8. Ben
9. McNabb
10. E Manning

I had difficulty with 4-7

Originally Posted by IronAddict

I in no way ever said Ben was the best QB! This was a Steeler thread, not a Ben thread. But, there it is again, being gregarious!

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

When discussing how good a football team is, the subject of QUARTERBACK comes up from time to time.

Originally Posted by Bradicallyman

I think the Steelers are a good team, especially their defense. And I think Ben is a good QB.

Here is my top ten in order

1.Brady
2.Favre
3.P Manning
4. Rivers
5. Romo
6. Brees
7. Cutler
8. Ben
9. McNabb
10. E Manning

I had difficulty with 4-7

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Argueably Bio, Argueably. I know you want to be cantankerous, but I will not be abraded! Nice try though.

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

Ah, well. You've got to like the newbie's enthusiasm.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

I'll give him that. things have been a slight bit more interesting with fresh blood this last week

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Again bio, ARGUEABLY! Don't be so bellicose.

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

Still a big difference between arguably the best and good.

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

No kidding. Bio-chem is always being bellicose, acting all bellicosey and shit with his bellicosish self.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Yeah! there is.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

still a long way to go in the season. they may win there division, but if they don't improve in some areas then it will be a first round loss in the playoffs

Originally Posted by IronAddict

I do have to agree again with you Bio. There is def. a whole lot to improve on. But, some good points as well.