|
|


I'm and endomorph-mezomorph so a bit of muscle mass comes naturally 

|
Hey!
I am 17 years old,about 18% bf and wanna get down to about 10%,with min. mass loss. I've been training for almost 8 months and I've lost quite a lot of weight but these last layers of fat just won't go away! Here's my diet: 7am: cottage cheese+bread+tomatoes 10am(at school) : sandwich made of {chicken breast+bread} + almonds 12am(at school): sandwich made of {chicken breast+bread} + banana 3pm: chicken breast+cheese+veggies 6pm(pre-workout): omlette+almonds 8pm(post-workout): protein shake --- total: aprox. 2200calories, 207g protein, 122g fat,100g carb, 15g fiber How does it look?THanks! |
|
There's no way he saving muscle on 100 carb a day and no carbs after workout, he has to up his carbs if he wants to build muscle. Do the math. Anaerobic and cardio workout is only about 400 - 500 cal per workout. It's a go hard, and go home workout to raise metabolism and target fat. And since he's been eating 2200 calories a day, but not loisng fat, I'm willing to bet his metabolism is slow right now.
|


yummy...
|
I save muscle just fine on less than 100g carb a day and no carb post workout, and I've got a LOT less test than you two.
|
|
Cardio won't raise metabolism once you're done - but you're right it WILL burn fat. Unfortunately, it will also burn muscle. He needs something to maintain muscle to go along with this, and the way you're suggesting, there's catabolism without anabolism.
|
|
Seriously, you're better off dieting the weight off, and training short and heavy to maintain muscle while you ride out the deficit.
|
|
OK.....
I think you're a bad comparison to him. But regardless of the carb debate, aren't we really talking calories here. In the grand scheme of things thats what matters. Sufficient protein, carb, and fat can effect diets in their own specific ways, but calorie surplus when bulking or deficit when cutting is the main goal. I chose to up them for available energy during the day. |
|
Semantics. It's pretty common knowledge that without the use of anabolics, it's almost impossible to gain muscle mass while dropping body fat at the same time, unless you are an obese beginner. I wasn't suggesting he was on a bulk. |
|
Originally Posted by the nut
he has to up his carbs if he wants to build muscle.
|
|
From the studies I've read about, you couldn't be more wrong. There plenty of studies cited here. I have never read that HIIT is any more catabolic than moderate cardio. And there are a lot of articles suggest anabolic properties of HIIT, however I have not seen specific studies done. I can tell you my legs and abs have never looked better, since I started HIIT. This is why I would suggested more slow digesting carbs and fat, which research shows, will cause him to burn carbohydrate and fat for fuel, while "saving" as much muscle as possible.
|
|
I calculated his maintenance at 2400 calories, medium level BMR plus activity for his weight. But I think when you look what I suggested compared to your suggestions, they're not that different. |
|
He's at 2200 cal / day. Go with 4 workouts / week followed by 20 mins moderate cardio. I'm put the energy output at about 200 cal/ workout, 40 - 45 mins. So that's 15,400 calories in and 800 calories out via exercise, every week. Not counting BMR thats 14,600 calories / week.
I suggested 2400 cal / day. Go with 4 circuits / week followed by 15 mins HIIT. Let's say 250 cal / workout, 30-35 mins. With the 2 one hour walks that would be approx 700 calories. That's 16,800 calories in and 1,700 calories out. Grand total of about 15,100. Our suggestions were off by 70 calories a day, and with the energy expenditure in mine, that extra won't go to waste. I do believe once he gets going on this program he would need to up the calories to 2800 - 3000 calories, due to an increase in BMR. |
|
We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one. There are certainly more people who cut the way you're stating, but I'm not fan. I personally worry about a decrease in metabolism when using big calorie deficits. I prefer a moderate, if any calorie deficit and intense, metabolism increasing workouts. Reason being, when I come of diets I easily keep gains and results. I assumed he'd been doing this diet while losing the weight he mentioned. I was looking to give him a kick start geared to attack belly fat. If that's not the case and you're just starting your original plan, then give it a shot. It's definitely one way of going about things. Whichever way you chose, I wouldn't worry about a minimal loss of muscle. Your main goal is to lose the gut. So cut now, and clean bulk in the winter, as built suggested. Train well! |
| Eat fewer calories than you require, you will lose weight. |
|
My sweet, save it for the choir - I just published an article, "Daredevils are Shredded", that goes into excruciating detail on the benefits of HIIT. .
|
|
The studies cited aren't mentioned in the context of running a significant caloric deficit.
THAT was what I meant. You had him doing circuits and HIIT, which is great, but won't preserve muscle mass under the deficit he's running. |
|
I don't calculate maintenance, I track it. But MY maintenance is 2200 and I'm a middle-aged woman who weighs a buck forty soaking wet. 2400 seems low.
|
|
How about he just eats less, keeps the protein high, keeps the fats as high and the carbs as low as he needs for satiety, trains low-rep and heavy and sees how his losses come along before we toss the whole shooting match at him, hey?
|
|
I assumed he'd been doing this diet while losing the weight he mentioned. I was looking to give him a kick start geared to attack belly fat. If that's not the case and you're just starting your original plan, then give it a shot. It's definitely one way of going about things. Whichever way you chose, I wouldn't worry about a minimal loss of muscle. Your main goal is to lose the gut. So cut now, and clean bulk in the winter, as built suggested.
|
|
I never consider the caloric deficit due to exercise. I honestly pretend it burns NOTHING. It's easier to tweak plans that way.
|

|
My hunger is fine, I don't have any cravings. Typically I will have egg whites in a protein shake in the morning, then mid morning a big bowl of broccoli (i love the stuff) that gets me to lunch where i have chicken/prawns, then mid arvo i have some celery sticks, dinner i have more prawns/chicken and then at night i have casein protein + egg whites in a shake. I am drinking a lot, at least 1.5L every 2-3 hours during the day and i will have a few cups of green tea maybe a coffee as well. Also have a multi, 10 fish oil tabs, and calcium - when i said i dont have supplements i meant no ECA stacks.
Energy is also fine, im pumping out weights at the gym that ive never done before. I find it hard to sleep at night because I have too much energy! |
|
I'm also considering this diet:
7am: oatmeal+omlette 10am: cottage cheese+bread workout,then shake 1pm: chicken breast+banana 3pm: chicken breast+veggies+peanuts 6pm: chicken breast+almonds 9pm: yogurt ---------------------------- aprox. 2400cal,250g protein,100g fats,150g carb ![]() |
and I must create a chicken farm as soon as possible


|
Im a 26yr old male and have been on Lyle McDonald's Rapid Fat Loss diet (which Built refers to) over the past 6 weeks. Starting weight 209lbs with a body fat of 32%. Im now at 182lbs with a body fat of 23%. I know body fat percentages because i have done DEXA scans. Thats 4.5lbs/wk. The diet is high protein, low fat/carbs. Not using any supplements either.
No cardio is done on the diet, just two low-rep high-weight workouts a week as detailed in the diet. When you are running such a calorie deficit the marginal impact of cardio is really irrelevant. I also do a weekly refeed (ie, once a week, 5 hours long) to partially rebalance metabolism, and help maintain the LBM. |
|
After having read the "Too Much Protein, Eaten Along With Fat, May Lead To Insulin Resistance" article I kinda changed the whole plan
... |
|
Hey guys.
I've been doing a lot of tests to see my protein needs and most of them say that a 17 yr old male, weighing 186lbs, 6 feet tall,that does moderate weight training /3 times a week should be having about 170g of protein/day ; What do you guys think? I do not do any other exhausting activites,except for moderate weight training 3 times a week; Thanks again ![]() |
|
Im a 26yr old male and have been on Lyle McDonald's Rapid Fat Loss diet (which Built refers to) over the past 6 weeks. Starting weight 209lbs with a body fat of 32%. Im now at 182lbs with a body fat of 23%. I know body fat percentages because i have done DEXA scans. Thats 4.5lbs/wk. The diet is high protein, low fat/carbs. Not using any supplements either.
No cardio is done on the diet, just two low-rep high-weight workouts a week as detailed in the diet. When you are running such a calorie deficit the marginal impact of cardio is really irrelevant. I also do a weekly refeed (ie, once a week, 5 hours long) to partially rebalance metabolism, and help maintain the LBM. |
|
Great Progress man
|
|
NO YOU CAN NOT.
Please read Lyle's book. He's very clear on this topic. sagejx, it's all in the link in my sig on "getting started". |
bran bread for the win |
OK.....
I think you're a bad comparison to him. But regardless of the carb debate, aren't we really talking calories here. In the grand scheme of things thats what matters. Sufficient protein, carb, and fat can effect diets in their own specific ways, but calorie surplus when bulking or deficit when cutting is the main goal. I chose to up them for available energy during the day. Semantics. It's pretty common knowledge that without the use of anabolics, it's almost impossible to gain muscle mass while dropping body fat at the same time, unless you are an obese beginner. I wasn't suggesting he was on a bulk. From the studies I've read about, you couldn't be more wrong. There plenty of studies cited here. I have never read that HIIT is any more catabolic than moderate cardio. And there are a lot of articles suggest anabolic properties of HIIT, however I have not seen specific studies done. I can tell you my legs and abs have never looked better, since I started HIIT. This is why I would suggested more slow digesting carbs and fat, which research shows, will cause him to burn carbohydrate and fat for fuel, while "saving" as much muscle as possible. I calculated his maintenance at 2400 calories, medium level BMR plus activity for his weight. But I think when you look what I suggested compared to your suggestions, they're not that different. He's at 2200 cal / day. Go with 4 workouts / week followed by 20 mins moderate cardio. I'm put the energy output at about 200 cal/ workout, 40 - 45 mins. So that's 15,400 calories in and 800 calories out via exercise, every week. Not counting BMR thats 14,600 calories / week. I suggested 2400 cal / day. Go with 4 circuits / week followed by 15 mins HIIT. Let's say 250 cal / workout, 30-35 mins. With the 2 one hour walks that would be approx 700 calories. That's 16,800 calories in and 1,700 calories out. Grand total of about 15,100. Our suggestions were off by 70 calories a day, and with the energy expenditure in mine, that extra won't go to waste. I do believe once he gets going on this program he would need to up the calories to 2800 - 3000 calories, due to an increase in BMR. We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one. There are certainly more people who cut the way you're stating, but I'm not fan. I personally worry about a decrease in metabolism when using big calorie deficits. I prefer a moderate, if any calorie deficit and intense, metabolism increasing workouts. Reason being, when I come of diets I easily keep gains and results. I assumed he'd been doing this diet while losing the weight he mentioned. I was looking to give him a kick start geared to attack belly fat. If that's not the case and you're just starting your original plan, then give it a shot. It's definitely one way of going about things. Whichever way you chose, I wouldn't worry about a minimal loss of muscle. Your main goal is to lose the gut. So cut now, and clean bulk in the winter, as built suggested. Train well! |
