I bet if there was a scientific study comparison done between a body builder consuming the regular creatine monohydrate powder and the creatine you are discussing...there would be little noticeable difference.
Not that I am trying doubt your knowledge or anything gopro, it is just that you hear much different reactions from those trying to sell products then the bodybuilders who are using them that are not affiliated with any proceeds from the sellers. I just really can't believe that creatine, no matter what delivery system used would make that big of a noticeable difference.
Now If I was a supplement manufacturer, I would take what ever product I could like creatine, market several variations, add fancy scientific explanations as to why they work better than the original, and sell them for much more money. Now its probably legal cause theoretically they are probably not lying. Maybe under these extensive scientific tests they may come out with higher values of benefit, but the bottom line is.. The benefit is probably so small that knowbody would even notice. So then the question... Is it worth paying for something like that when you can't even notice with the human eye the difference it would make. Me, I stick with my 12.00 tub of creatine and use grape juice as a delivery system. Heck I bet the supplement manufacturers are even trying to take standard grape juice and rename that to make it sound like it is of special benefit to bodybuilders
I know this is all talk out of my rear here...but I've seen this happen so many times before, and not just with body building supplements, with anything.
Look at all the generic products you can buy. For the majority of them, if you compare ingredients, they are identical to those with big names trying to off the identical product for like 25 percent more money at minimum.