Thread: EK YellowTops - Test Results

Product photos

Over in another board, someone posted their result and it was 9.

well you know it is real just underdosed so you have to take 3x as much to get same effect of higher priced GH so price is really not to good compared to others.

The last test was 2.6... that's not even close to 9, let alone the low hurdle of 15...

Bunk. Why does EK keep them on the shelf? I guess they enjoy selling bunk gear. Scratch EK off guys to buy from

Originally Posted by BP2000

Bunk. Why does EK keep them on the shelf? I guess they enjoy selling bunk gear. Scratch EK off guys to buy from

it simply happen when u buy chinese generic, just solve this problem via PM with EK and stop to spread a BS for nothing.

Originally Posted by Grozny

it simply happen when u buy chinese generic, just solve this problem via PM with EK and stop to spread a BS for nothing.

^^^correct way to do things...thanks for this post grozny

Getting f'ed on 11 kits isn't cool. If there are two other positive tests, would love to see links.. I've provided two results of failed tests. Stating that I'm disappointed would be a flat out lie at this point. There will be a little noise about this one.

The two failed tested needs to be placed in the sticky forum, as they are protocol followed tests on products being distributed in OUR forum. Protocol testing is established to protect the entire community from burns like this taking place. The lack of effort of EK is laughable at best.

This member's review: Buyer Beware is an understatement.


King Louie -

YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE POSTING THOSE LOW NUMBERS...nobody else tested low like you...it's not the gear...it's you...

You're correct Irish about one thing... I'm the only one posting up blood tests of your product. The problem lies in that they both failed miserably; along with the lack of EK backing his product. So I'll face the wrath of EK due to posting failed test results... The MO now is defame the member posting bad results?

Lame.

Looks like bunk hgh to me.
Buying generic hgh is risky regardless of the source.
Ill post results in the sticky.
If anyone would like to cover the cost of my testing, ill test them for comparison. I have pharma results for comparison.

Originally Posted by Grozny

it simply happen when u buy chinese generic, just solve this problem via PM with EK and stop to spread a BS for nothing.

I would rather see transparency in sponsors products. This issue shouldn't need to hide behind PMs.


Sent from my jewPhone

Agreed... hence more blood work needs to be posted by members: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly. Let's highlight the solid service and product offerings, and shed light on the areas which fall short.

FYI - An 11 kit burn by EK doesn't sit well...

this is now 5 threads on 3 boards you've made on this subject, but the fact still remains that you're the only person reporting low numbers...at what point do we consider you just a low responder and your actions becoming trollish or smear campaign? it won't get you free gear...

There is HGH in these kits but the readings are very low. Might have been exposed to heat or mixed improperly as rHGH is fragile once reconstituted.

Was this injected IM or SubQ?

Originally Posted by irish_2003

this is now 5 threads on 3 boards you've made on this subject, but the fact still remains that you're the only person reporting low numbers...at what point do we consider you just a low responder and your actions becoming trollish or smear campaign? it won't get you free gear...

If I got 11 kits and had numbers like that I'd be doing the same thing, wouldn't you?
I've never seen a score below 15 in any study using 10 iu IM. Being a low responder would put him at about 15 from all the testing I've seen.

Originally Posted by exphys88

If I got 11 kits and had numbers like that I'd be doing the same thing, wouldn't you?
I've never seen a score below 15 in any study using 10 iu IM. Being a low responder would put him at about 15 from all the testing I've seen.

not true...a low responsder won't give you a high 15 on generics

Originally Posted by irish_2003

not true...a low responsder won't give you a high 15 on generics

What do you mean on generics? I scored very low on pharma (17) and a 15 on generics.
If it says it contains 10 iu of hgh, then it should be somewhere close to that, otherwise it's being deceitful. He barely tested above the normal range.
Have you read the studies posted in the sticky section?

Originally Posted by exphys88

What do you mean on generics? I scored very low on pharma (17) and a 15 on generics.
If it says it contains 10 iu of hgh, then it should be somewhere close to that, otherwise it's being deceitful. He barely tested above the normal range.
Have you read the studies posted in the sticky section?

if you're scoring that high you're def not a "low responder"...he's a low responder...and unless he has tested other sponsors gh with much different numbers, that's what i'm going with and that's what ek is going with

This myth will be displayed shortly... stay tuned for more tests. GR Anabolic will have a protocol followed test performed on their product very soon. I'll post it up in another thread.

Originally Posted by irish_2003

if you're scoring that high you're def not a "low responder"...he's a low responder...and unless he has tested other sponsors gh with much different numbers, that's what i'm going with and that's what ek is going with

You're obviously not very familiar w all the testing that's been done. Guys that tested pharm grade all got scores ranging from 15-60, w most falling between 25-35. As of now I've never seen a score of pharma grade under 15.
A score of 3 means there is very little gh in there.
And I don't care if they're generic or not, they're being sold as 10 iu per vial.

Originally Posted by KingLouie

This myth will be displayed shortly... stay tuned for more tests. GR Anabolic will have a protocol followed test performed on their product very soon. I'll post it up in another thread.

There's already plenty of tests done in this section and on promuscle on generics that show a score of 3 means they're practically bunk.

This thread has turned into an argument and should be moved.

Originally Posted by hoyle21

This thread has turned into an argument and should be moved.

A scientific debate is perfectly fine here. It gives both parties a chance to discuss the results that are posted in this section.

Originally Posted by exphys88

A scientific debate is perfectly fine here. It gives both parties a chance to discuss the results that are posted in this section.

It's not a scientific debate. The science is all on one side of this discussion.

Originally Posted by hoyle21

It's not a scientific debate. The science is all on one side of this discussion.

Lol

its simply. you got what you pay!
go get sereno sizen in USA pharma and pay 1500$ for 100iu and you will be for sure happy!