They're not babies until I hear them scream. So no!![]()
No, I disagree with that.
Yes, that is very true.
I will have to read my Bible and pray on that question.
God Hates Babies
They're not babies until I hear them scream. So no!![]()
When I eat eggs, I call them eggs, not chickens.
Well that would bring up another question does a fetus have a soul?
Inzer Advanced
(Pump till you Puke).

So many cries of inequality stem from one of group
of people doing little or nothing and then bitching
about another group that actually does something
to improve their lives.


Bongo enjoys intelligent posts.......
![]()




I aborted about a pound and a half of various unabsorbed foods about an hour ago.
I hope God likes leftovers.


TheCaptn' is not a registered proctologist. His post are for his amusement only. Please seek proper medical advice if symptoms persist.


To God, I suspect, the mortal life - as fleeting as it is - means nothing. The soul is what's important and so life and death on this earth is of little to zero consequence.
Just imagine, for a being who has been around for countless years, what's the difference between 10 weeks and 100 years? Each span of time is literally insignificant when compared to eternity. Like a grain of sand on a beach.
That said, God is probably not worried/concerned about speed. He has all the time in the world.


Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.


Babies have lots of fiber so God eats them for breakfast, but he doesn't like them. It's like oatmeal to us.
DRSE Reconnaissance


Amy Schumer - The Good News - Video Clip | Comedy Central's Jokes.com
Have you heard the Good News? Uh maybe you haven't heard the Bad News
Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
and drag down the features of age,
no folds or creases from unkempt wear
eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012


I am 100% PRO-CHOICE, I don't think religious fanatics and/or the government need to decide whether a woman chooses to abort her baby, period.




^^Werd. One must admit however, when a haploid gamete from a female successfully unites with the same from a male thereby creating a diploid zygote capable of developing into a fully functional life form, It has become in a way an autonomous entity. This embryonic entity does not possess moral status however and thus it could be argued that abortion is morally sound.
Arguing from the deontological standpoint that there is a supernatural being determining what is and is not morally permissible, artificial abortion would seem unsound. It would however expedite the process of departure from the physical realm to another state of existence or more plainly, to God.
I agree with Peter Singer's breakdown of this argument. I have much more respect for his argument than the common pro-abortion idea that before the fetus is born it's ok but after is murder. From a logic standpoint it makes no sense but almost everyone agrees(prochoice or not) that once the baby is born, killing it is murder. There must be something genetically ingrained in us to think that way.
Here's a quick rundown from wiki:Peter Singer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaConsistent with his general ethical theory, Singer holds that the right to life is intrinsically tied to a being's capacity to hold preferences, which in turn is intrinsically tied to a being's capacity to feel pain and pleasure. In his view, the central argument against abortion may be stated as the following syllogism:
It is wrong to kill an innocent human being.
A human fetus is an innocent human being.
Therefore it is wrong to kill a human fetus.[15]
In his book Rethinking Life and Death, as well as in Practical Ethics, Singer asserts that, if we take the premises at face value, the argument is deductively valid. Singer comments that defenders of abortion attack the second premise, suggesting that the fetus becomes a "human" or "alive" at some point after conception; however, Singer argues that human development is a gradual process, that it is nearly impossible to mark a particular moment in time as the moment at which human life begins.
Singer at MIT.
Singer's argument for abortion differs from many other proponents of abortion; rather than attacking the second premise of the anti-abortion argument, Singer attacks the first premise, denying that it is necessarily wrong to take innocent human life:
[The argument that a fetus is not alive] is a resort to a convenient fiction that turns an evidently living being into one that legally is not alive. Instead of accepting such fictions, we should recognise that the fact that a being is human, and alive, does not in itself tell us whether it is wrong to take that being's life.[16]
DISCLAIMER: