IronMagLabs Osta Rx


Nuke 'Em!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Nuke 'Em!

  1. #31
    Registered User

    bio-chem's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    7,915
    Rep Points
    137779437


    Quote Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
    Shut it, you!
    You got clowned, and it was funny. its a rare sight to see you capped like that. I'm sure I'll get mine soon, but for now
    Quote Originally Posted by IainDaniel View Post
    Here is what you need to worry about. Eat, Lift, Rest. Repeat.
    This should be really simple, stop over complicating it.

  2. #32
    Registered User

    bio-chem's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    7,915
    Rep Points
    137779437


    Quote Originally Posted by maniclion View Post
    I am surprised you fiscal conservatives are even backing this....
    I consider myself a fiscal conservative. why should I not back this?

    as I see it, it is an 8 billion loan guarantee. it's an incentive that only costs the taxpayers if something doesn't work out down the road. And it is for a cause I feel is an acceptable risk because of the potential payoff. considering how much the government is handing out recently to corporations just to keep them solvent this seems like a bargain.
    Quote Originally Posted by IainDaniel View Post
    Here is what you need to worry about. Eat, Lift, Rest. Repeat.
    This should be really simple, stop over complicating it.

  3. #33
    Bohemian Extraordinaire
    ELITE MEMBER

    maniclion's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Mēns Incognita
    Posts
    25,581
    Rep Points
    396362507


    Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem View Post
    I consider myself a fiscal conservative. why should I not back this?

    as I see it, it is an 8 billion loan guarantee. it's an incentive that only costs the taxpayers if something doesn't work out down the road. And it is for a cause I feel is an acceptable risk because of the potential payoff. considering how much the government is handing out recently to corporations just to keep them solvent this seems like a bargain.
    I'm just saying I am all for anything other than burning fossil fuels and reading some of the financial sites commentary makes me pretty confident we will be footing the bill for these reactors, if they even get built....
    Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
    not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
    and drag down the features of age,
    no folds or creases from unkempt wear
    eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
    no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
    but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012

  4. #34
    Registered User

    Vance's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    158
    Rep Points
    1475566

    Nuclear is the way to go.

    All the soap dodgers, hippies and enviro-nazis who say otherwise can go fuck themselves.

  5. #35
    Registered User

    bio-chem's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    7,915
    Rep Points
    137779437


    Quote Originally Posted by maniclion View Post
    I'm just saying I am all for anything other than burning fossil fuels and reading some of the financial sites commentary makes me pretty confident we will be footing the bill for these reactors, if they even get built....
    at 3-5 cents/kilowatt hour for 2500 combined MW that seems like a pretty damn good deal
    Quote Originally Posted by IainDaniel View Post
    Here is what you need to worry about. Eat, Lift, Rest. Repeat.
    This should be really simple, stop over complicating it.

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    danzik17's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    3,797
    Rep Points
    61145583


    Quote Originally Posted by bio-chem View Post
    I consider myself a fiscal conservative. why should I not back this?

    as I see it, it is an 8 billion loan guarantee. it's an incentive that only costs the taxpayers if something doesn't work out down the road. And it is for a cause I feel is an acceptable risk because of the potential payoff. considering how much the government is handing out recently to corporations just to keep them solvent this seems like a bargain.
    It's also no different than the construction of our highway system. That was a major undertaking that no private corporation could ever match. It's an investment in our infrastructure that will pay itself off tenfold. It's also much cleaner than coal power plants, especially if we use thorium reactors like they do in France. That should minimize toxic waste as much as possible.
    Ron Paul 2012

    No gym for home, work out floor with 30, but is it for 20 like 30 lb when you no lift it to be for men, for 30 lbs instead? or half is 10 for 20 pounds?

  7. #37
    RDRSE Ghost Assassin
    ELITE MEMBER

    Dark Geared God's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    9,012
    Rep Points
    425115508


    In AZ We have had on for over 20 years no melt down jobs...and all the good stuff that go's with it nuke..oh also nuke iran shit nuck them all except the jews.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Nuke a Middle Eastern Country
    By TJ Cline in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 219
    Last Post: 09-25-2006, 10:11 AM
  2. Pretty pink nuke
    By Vieope in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-17-2005, 05:49 PM
  3. Iraq nuke labs
    By Tboy in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-10-2003, 01:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.